Pumpfun is becoming a joke. @a1lon9 Man, I don’t even want to talk about the $Kimchi situation. It’s all over the place already. But there’s another issue I personally experienced, and this shit needs to be addressed. Yesterday, solana:EseixJpngT2z1prgmpd8kUz71kACKiRjkbQHxWELpump ran to $140K before reversing. EseixJpngT2z1prgmpd8kUz71kACKiRjkbQHxWELpump The @pumpfun UI showed it as created by the same dev behind $PENGU, associated with @pudgypenguins. Naturally, people noticed. The lore started building, and traders saw that connection. I was up 50–60 $Sol holding close to 6% across two wallets. Today, the creator wallet displayed on the UI has changed. So what exactly happened here? If you’re using a big-name dev’s reputation to build conviction around a coin, that connection matters. People ape in, build the lore, make content, and shill the narrative. Then the creator label changes, and everyone’s left guessing. I’m not saying a wallet change proves anything by itself. I’m asking why this information changes and where the transparency is. @pumpfun makes millions every day, yet traders are still left questioning what they’re actually buying into. My advice: be extremely cautious with coins marketed around high-profile devs, previous big winners, or old wallets with impressive lore. Verify everything independently. A familiar name or wallet isn’t proof of legitimacy, and sometimes the narrative itself can be the bait. Crypto is a casino. Getting rekt is part of the game. But we shouldn’t have to gamble on whether the information we’re shown is even reliable. Fix the transparency before people lose faith in the entire platform. Never again. All Proofs below.