"Is Islam compatible with western values" The values in question:

Brotherhood in Ahmadiyyah 🤍

Was Muhammad (صل الله عليه وسلم) POISONED to death?! Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) die of cholera? Muhammad (saw) asked in his end times: “O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.” (❔) ~Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 The tone of voice would indicate that this is a question, not a statement. There is sufficient evidence that he was not poisoned to death. Such as the fact that the poisoned meat was so fatal that the Sahabi Bishra bin al-Bara’ bin Ma‘rur (ra) who ate from it was paralysed then died perhaps a year later. Whereas it is famously known that Sayyiduna Muhammad (saw) lived for a few years after the event and was not paralysed nor had other sever effects nor did it affect his ‘Ibadah. SIMILARLY Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (عليه السلام) Also asked his DOCTOR (you don’t tell your doctor what you have, instead he tells you since he is the doctor lol) : میر صاحب مجھے وبائی ہیضہ ہو گیا ہے”۔” “Mir Sahib, I have (have I) been afflicted with epidemic cholera. (❓)” ~ Hayat-e-Nasir, pg. 14 Once again there is plenty of proof that he did in fact NOT die of cholera. Such as the fact that he was transported from Lahore to Qadian and the government had strict rules to prevent the spread of cholera (as it was an infectious disease). To read more about both topics I recommend these 2 Articles: -alhakam.org/islam-today-was-… -alislam.org/articles/did-haz… لسلام عليكم و الله أعلم

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) said the Qur'aan states to stone the adulterer? Huzoor aa was sent a quote from the Promised Messiah as wherein he states, “There is a clear injunction in the Holy Quran to amputate the hand of a thief and to stone the adulterer”. Huzoor aa was then asked that while the former was mentioned in the Holy Quran, there was no mention of stoning an adulterer in any of the verses. Huzoor aa was asked for guidance on the matter. Huzoor aa, in a letter dated 15 October 2018, gave the following reply: “There are generally two aspects to Islamic punishments: a severe punishment and a comparatively moderate punishment. The main purpose of these punishments is to prevent evil and to serve as an admonition for others. “Therefore, we see that during the time of the Holy Prophet sa and the Khulafa-e-Rashideen, not all kinds of thieves were punished with amputation of their hands. This punishment was, for example, never applied for the theft of food and drink. However, if a thief, while snatching a woman’s jewellery, injures her hand or ear or causes injury to any part of her body in such a way that she becomes disabled, then such a thief is punished according to the crime. This also includes the punishment of the amputation of the hands. “Likewise, if adultery or fornication is committed by mutual consent and it is proven by the Islamic method of witnessing, then the concerning parties are sentenced to a hundred lashes. However, in the case of rape, which is of extremely barbaric nature, or if a rapist has committed this heinous act by abusing young children, then the punishment for such a person cannot be merely a hundred floggings. Such an adulterer or rapist can then be given the extreme punishment such as killing and stoning according to the teachings mentioned in Surah al-Maidah [chapter 5], verse 34 and Surah al-Ahzab [chapter 33], verses 61-63 of the Holy Quran. However, the right of meting out this punishment is given to the ruling government of the time. This teaching has merely given them an option in general. “Therefore, it is in light of these Quranic verses that the Promised Messiah as has also stated that the punishment mentioned in the Holy Quran for such an adulterer or rapist was stoning.” alhakam.org/what-is-the-phil…