OK $kas So I was emailed by some Wikipedia moderators asking me to justify the existence of an article about Sompolinsky (which is now up for deletion). I read the article, and it reads like promotional AI slop that gets a lot of details wrong, including wrong publication dates, wrong descriptions of technical terms, etc.. But I think the most embarrassing part was trying to pass him winning a glorified X poll by binance as "professional recognition and awards". But the bottom line, I think, is that Sompolinsky is simply not significant enough to have a Wikipedia article. I believe whoever tried this stunt honestly believes Sompolinsky is a historical figure. But they are wrong, and that's a huge part of the gap between how Kaspa (and cryptocurrencies in general, tbh) is viewed internally vs. externally. Yeah, it has its merits, and there are reasons you love it. But at the end of the day, Kaspa is just another crypto project, founded by just another crypto founder, that has hardly made a dent in reality, or even in the cryptocurrency space outside the PoW mini-bubble. Despite its technical superiority, it failed to become revolutionary. When you try to pass it off as something revolutionary, just because you think it should be, you come off as delusional. And if you truly think there is any "revolution" to Kaspa's name, outside a very narrow theoretical discussion, then you are delusional. Promoting your project is fine, but Kaspa used to be about integrity (until Sompolinsky let his ego ruin everything, and most people with a modicum of integrity were driven away), and promoting it as you would any ye olde shitcoin just makes its few unique benefits drown in the brownish-gray, depressing sea of ramnants of what was once an industry.