Coach, and Personal trainer. Health, fitness, nutrition, and recovery @ Strength By Fitness. Read an article, get coached, train well.

Joined March 2024
Weekend Reading. What is your resistance training focus? Strength & performance, health, or is it hypertrophy? And what should it be, if it even matters? Medium. medium.com/strengthbyfitness… Our website. strengthbyfitness.com/2024/0…
7
2
1
27
6,283
There is a huge difference between having 1. A lean and muscular physique, and 2. Having a lean and muscular physique that can also perform. If its not n2 you are not fit. And for number 2 you need to lift weights & do some form of challenging cardio, every week, all-year-round.
98% of people that have a good physique just lift weights, walk, and eat well Running is believed to be necessary to get/stay in shape by a lot of people that aren’t in shape but it’s actually totally unnecessary
6
200
If you actually look at this study ( and combine it with what we know from all other studies and n1 ) we see that. A. plant-based people need to eat quite a bit more protein per unit of energy, not less, as they did in this study. 1/..
Shawn is right. And the numbers are worse than most vegans want to hear. EPIC-Oxford, run out of the University of Oxford. Nearly 55,000 people followed for an average of 17.6 years. Compared with meat eaters, vegans had: More than DOUBLE the risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio 2.31). 43% higher risk of any fracture. About double the risk of leg fracture. That works out to about 15 extra hip fractures for every 1,000 vegans over 10 years. They adjusted for income, lifestyle and BMI. The gap held. They adjusted for calcium and protein intake. It shrank a little and still held. A hip fracture in an older person is not a bruise. It's often the start of the end. Your bones are built from protein, minerals and fat-soluble vitamins. Meat and eggs bring all of them, ready to use. I covered the research on meat and bone strength in a video. Meat is a health food. For your bones too... Read the actual study. Link below...
2
1
1
144
Why would anyone eat in a predominantly or entirely plant-based way if it requires making smarter and more educated food choices? Better health outcomes at large is the clear winner. For you & for the planet. While fracture risk can increase, most health outcomes improve.
1
19
And fracture risk, as I have highlighted here in this x thread are nothing but the logical outcome of your fact-based food habits. As such, that fracture risk is 100% in your control and you can easily mitigate that risk as a plant-based person. Eat better & lift weights.
11
Many forget that lifting weights is NOT all about hypertrophy. You also improve bone & tendon health & capacity, as well as help improve organ health, hormones, mitochondrial, cardiovascular and cognitive health & capacity, & improve the way your body handles the food you eat.
3
91
The interesting thing with hydration is that its not just about our performance & daily life, but it impacts how our bodies handle the food we eat as well. Even protein absorption & resulting synthesis seem to be affected by hydration.
Digestive issues in endurance events have been around since fueling became a thing. So why do people continue to take the risk, and why has carbohydrate intake seemingly gone up in the face of this? It improves performance, we have learned how to train it better, and product/protocols have improved. People will always take risks if the payout of a better performance is on the table by assuming some risk. With carbohydrate fueling, the performance payout goes up with increased intake to a degree. Sport is currently stress testing the ceiling. It is safe to assume some value up to 60-90 g/hr if it can be tolerated. So, how do you extract this value without taking on too much risk? 1) Hydration. If you mess up hydration your nutrition plan will go with it. You can have a fully rehearsed nutrition plan stop working if your hydration is off. 2) Increase gradually. If you are currently only averaging 20-30 g/hr don't just jump up to 90 g/hr and assume this will go well. Increase gradually over a series of training sessions in increments of ~10-15 g/hr. 3) Practice event day. Focus on practicing your fueling targets during your event days specific training sessions. Think of this as part of the training. You are literally training your gut to tolerate what you are going to challenge it with on event day. 4) If your event is really long, like an ultramarathon lasting well beyond your longest training day, it is likely that your tolerance in training (grams per hour) will be slightly higher than it will be on event day. It is worth considering training your gut to tolerate a bit more (10-15 g/hr) in training than you plan to average on event day if the event is very long.
1
50
Well put. Consistent weekly workouts and putting in a real effort most sets per session is what builds progress. This outcome will never stop, if you adjust the load, effort, or reps, or all, as you improve. Fancy equipment is optional. Adherence, effort & recovery is not
When I quit the gym, people told me I'd never get real results training at home. I knew that was BS. I didn't need a study to tell me. Strength has been built the same way for thousands of years, and you can see it if you look. The ancient Greeks built physiques so impressive we're still carving them into statues. No barbells. The crowd at Muscle Beach in the 1940s and 50s was pressing their training partners overhead in the sand. Old time strongmen built incredible physiques with a couple of dumbbells and a lot of creativity. Gymnasts are some of the most muscular athletes on the planet, and most of their training never touches a weight. They all did the same thing. They asked their muscles to do a little more than last time, week after week, for years. That's progressive overload. It's the granddaddy of every training principle, and it doesn't care where the load comes from. Your muscles don't have eyes. As the legend goes, Milo of Croton got strong carrying a calf on his shoulders every day as it grew into a bull. Muscle Beach regulars squatted with their girlfriends on their shoulders. Gymnasts do dips on rings. Your muscles can't tell the difference. All they know is whether the work was hard enough to adapt to. Now we have more tools and more information than any generation in history, and people are more confused about training than ever. The science based lifting trend started in a good place. Somewhere along the way it turned into this: if every variable isn't optimal, you may as well not bother. Meanwhile, people have been building great physiques for 2,500 years by asking their muscles for a little more each week. And the research backs it up. Back in 2017, researchers in Japan put push-ups head to head with the bench press. Two groups of young men trained twice a week for 8 weeks. One group benched. The other did push ups, with their body position adjusted so the load matched the bench. Both groups took every set to failure. Their chest and triceps grew about the same, and their strength went up about the same. Like I said, your muscles don't have eyes. Then a study published this month showed what happens when you stop progressing. Beginners trained both legs for 12 weeks. One leg added weight as it got stronger. The other kept the same weight and the same reps the entire time. For the first two months, both legs grew the same. Then around week 9, the same weight leg fell behind. The leg got stronger, so the same workout got easier. By the end, every set was being finished with 4 reps still left in the tank. Put those two studies together and you get the whole picture. Push ups build muscle about as well as the bench press. And doing the same push ups forever stops building muscle, the same way benching 135 forever would. Anyone who's ever benched knows what to do when 135 gets easy. You throw a 2.5 on each side and keep going. But when push-ups get easy, almost nobody thinks to make them harder. They keep doing the same push ups until they're bored, decide push ups don't work, and go buy a gym membership. All they had to do was put their feet up. For a 180 pound guy, a regular push up moves about 115 pounds. Put your feet on a 12 inch step and it's about 126. That's like slapping your 2.5s on each side. Good, consistent results come down to about 4 hard sets per muscle each week. Hard means you finish within a rep or two of not being able to do another. After the first couple of months, keep making the exercise harder so the sets stay hard. When the reps start to feel tough, push for one or two more. Those are your Money Reps, and they're the ones doing the work. Yes, there's nuance to building the perfect program. But Everything past this is optimizing.
1
2
75
Strength By Fitness retweeted
Replying to @DanielBerglind
100% agreed with Joachim here. I have never encountered a NHL player that had become too strong 😄. Or a American football, soccer or MMA fighter et cetera. But at rare times, the energy, time & effort required to get even stronger might be better spent on something else.
1
1
73
Replying to @DanielBerglind
And diminishing returns isn't negative returns. Most athletes will never get strong enough to find out where the ceiling is. I wouldn't worry about too much strength until you've built enough of it.
1
1
3
144
The adult world has been helicopter parenting their offspring into overly anxious snowflakes that are less capable, happy & healthy for a couple of decades by now. Habits shape outcomes & good intentions will never change that. Encourage play, independence, sports & fitness 💪
84% of 11-year-olds aren't allowed to leave their street. 53% can't leave their front yard. 92% of 14-year-olds can't leave their neighborhood. We built a culture obsessed with safety. The result? A generation that's measurably more anxious: substack.com/home/post/p-197…
1
37
Strength By Fitness retweeted
Replying to @StrengthDebates
Heart health & cardiovascular fitness ✅️. Cardio & strength also & always matter for fat loss too. There wont ever be a situation where its an either or choice. Eat nutrient rich foods, lift weights & run. No matter if athletic performance, health, or fat loss is of interest.
1
30
Strength By Fitness retweeted
Replying to @DrEenfeldt
While Zack is correct purely from a numbers perspective. If anyone truly only cares about body fat being added or lost temporarily. It is, however, as you elegantly showed here, such an inferior & incomplete way of approaching health, fitness, food & habits. Nutrients matter 💪
1
2
108
Strength By Fitness retweeted
Replying to @DavidDack
Always 💪💪. Same with lifting weights. I dont care about getting a new PB. What I care about is showing up and putting in the work. And that will always move the needle for physical & cognitive maintenance, as well as lifting our health & performance floor & ceiling. PB or not.
1
1
1
33
Strength By Fitness retweeted
Replying to @mindmusclepro
Not to mention that stairs also achieve a much higher stimulus. So not just free steps, its also solid muscle stimulus in those lower body muscles sedentary people hardly ever get anymore. Always take the stairs 💪💪💪
1
1
86
Personally, as a coach, I find that most people can go well above 40g of fiber per day. And as is the case with protein, gain even better outcomes. Its unlike protein something you have to work your way up to, however. So start around 20 to ~ 30g if sensitive.
How do you downregulate your appetite to promote weight loss?...turn up the dial on protein & fibre intake. Start by aiming for 1g of protein per kg of BW. This can be pushed up to 1.5g/kg. For fibre, aim for the advised intake of 30g/day. Most people only eat @ half this amount.
1
2
119