Here's the full @CBS12 report by @katievbentetv on my lawsuit against Flock. They did a nice production job. @IJ @CatoInstitute @NCLAlegal @AaronSiriSG @TuckerCarlson @HarmeetKDhillon @USAO_SDFL @USAttyEssayli @AGToddBlanche @AGJamesUthmeier @RonDeSantis @RepThomasMassie @RoKhanna @ggreenwald @FmrRepMTG @Snowden @LeslieManookian @DrOzCMS @RobertKennedyJr @NIHDirector_Jay @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @laralogan @SharylAttkisson @EmeraldRobinson @PeterTicktin

I am in Federal Court suing the City Port St. Lucie for, among other things, violating my First Amendment rides during a public meeting. greerjournal.com/greer-v-flo… Therefore, I found this video interesting. I had to take a screenshot of it and have Google locate the origin. Google AI summary: This video captures an incident from a January 2024 city council meeting in the coastal town of Aransas Pass, Texas, involving attorney and activist CJ Grisham. While addressing the council during the public comment portion of the meeting, Grisham was reading directly from a U.S. Supreme Court free-speech ruling when the mayor and council abruptly objected to his comments and ordered him to step away from the podium. In the video, it is clear that city officials violated his constitutional rights by threatening to arrest him simply for exercising his legal right to speak at a public forum. Because public comment sections are protected spaces for citizens to address their government, shutting down his speech based on its content constitutes a clear First Amendment violation. Furthermore, ordering a citizen away from a public podium under the direct, immediate threat of police arrest acts as an unlawful restraint on liberty, marking a violation of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable seizure. Following the confrontation, Grisham returned with a federal civil rights lawsuit, registered as case number 2:25-cv-00302 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The lawsuit targeted the city, the mayor, and the police chief, formally alleging First Amendment free speech retaliation, Fourth Amendment unlawful seizure, and Fourteenth Amendment due process violations. Grisham argued that the council's restrictive rules of decorum were unconstitutionally vague and were weaponized to censor legitimate criticism of local officials. The federal lawsuit was ultimately resolved in the spring of 2026 after both sides entered into a private settlement agreement, leading the court to formally dismiss and terminate the civil action on April 22, 2026. Parallel to the federal civil suit, a separate criminal case was pursued against Grisham, as authorities had pressed misdemeanor charges for "disrupting a lawful meeting" regarding the podium incident. That criminal trial concluded in late 2025, but the state failed to secure a conviction, ultimately resulting in a hung jury and a mistrial. @katievbentetv @MikeMagsCBS12 @CBS12 @Giordano4Mayor @NCLAlegal @CatoInstitute @IJ @AaronSiriSG @LeslieManookian @RudyGiuliani @SidneyPowell1 @USAO_SDFL @AGJamesUthmeier @RonDeSantis @PeterTicktin

The NSA and CIA literally know everything you do and watch on your television: This report details findings from a Northeastern University paper titled "Watching the Watchers: Privacy Analysis of U.S. Smart TV Automatic Content Recognition." Researchers investigated if modern televisions spy on viewing patterns and send data to cloud pipelines. They confirmed it occurs. Study Overview & Key Findings The team tested major smart TV operating systems, including Samsung, Vizio, LG, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, and Hisense. They found that TVs capture screen snapshots or audio recordings to log viewing history. The study proves that opting out through settings menus fails to stop tracking on multiple platforms. Vizio TVs ignored the privacy toggle in 100% of tested opt-out scenarios, while Samsung TVs continued tracking in 60% of cases. On Hisense VIDAA TVs, an unencrypted pipeline exposed 57 million viewing records from 1 million televisions, sorting household habits into categories like politics and religion. Where the Data and Infrastructure End Up TV brands route this tracking data through Amazon Web Services (AWS) infrastructure using ingestion tools like Amazon Kinesis. While these systems operate as commercial advertising pipelines, Amazon maintains cloud infrastructure contracts with intelligence agencies, including the CIA and the defense establishment. Because these private data pipelines connect to government data systems, the line between corporate tracking and intelligence apparatuses like the NSA, CIA, and the deep state does not exist, leaving viewing patterns vulnerable to surveillance. The Risks of Ideological Targeting This profiling presents risks regarding political and ideological targeting. Law enforcement and administrative agencies have expanded definitions of extremism, scrutinizing citizens based on religious beliefs, involvement at school board meetings, or expressions of patriotism. When a data apparatus logs if a household watches religious programming, conservative news, or patriotic content, it provides a blueprint for weaponization. Administrations can use this profiling database to identify, flag, and target households whose media consumption deviates from the political establishment. It gets worse: televisions listen to you and watch you. A cybersecurity audit by Pen Test Partners examined the internal systems of smart TVs and found that built-in microphones record living room conversations, transmitting audio files over the internet unencrypted. Furthermore, research published by security engineers at NCC Group revealed that televisions equipped with webcams can be hijacked to film inside the home without user knowledge, turning the screen into an audio and video monitoring device. watchingthewatchers.github.i… @katievbentetv @MikeMagsCBS12 @ggreenwald @Snowden @elonmusk @AaronSiriSG @NCLAlegal @DrOzCMS @joekent16jan19 @TulsiGabbard @USAO_SDFL @USAttyEssayli @TuckerCarlson @mtaibbi @RepThomasMassie