This scorpion is way too aggressive to be tattooing a snake! 😜💀

King Cobra pulled up with the full hood and the cat still looked away mid-fight. Zero fear.

Bro turned pomegranate peeling into an art! 😮🔥

🚨 Double Standards Alert: The Same Voices Who Once Celebrated Ex-CJI Chandrachud Are Now Targeting Him 1. Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud was the darling of Opposition & left-liberal circles for years. They cheered his progressive rulings — Right to Privacy, Section 377, Sabarimala, Aadhaar dissent, adultery law, and strong positions on Bhima Koregaon cases. He was called independent, intellectual, and progressive. 2. Now Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul’s memoir claims Chandrachud was “too deferential” to the government on judicial appointments (seeking pre-approval of names before Collegium discussions). Suddenly, the same ecosystem is amplifying criticism and painting him as pro-government. Classic flip-flop. 3. What Karnan did to Kaul, Kaul is now doing to Chandrachud. When Karnan publicly attacked Kaul with serious allegations during his Madras HC tenure, the outrage was muted or defended in certain circles. SC later held Karnan in contempt. Today, Kaul’s public criticism is being selectively boosted. Judiciary independence cannot be selective. You either defend the institution consistently or you don’t. One day street pressure and demands for resignation, the next day weaponising one judge’s memoir against another — the pattern is clear.

President Vladimir Putin is teaching a kid how to take down a grown man using body weight!

When Former CJI Chandrachud’s judgments aligned with liberal causes, they were celebrated as evidence of a progressive judiciary. His privacy judgment, the Section 377 ruling and his Aadhaar dissent were repeatedly discussed in that context. But a judge’s legacy cannot be reduced to a highlight reel of politically convenient judgments. If judicial independence matters, it must matter even when the questions are uncomfortable.