Why is the media narrative being pushed by @GNev2 and @Carra23 that Ange Postecoglou needs to adapt and have a plan B in order to get results. Making it out to be some unique thing that Ange Postecoglou has a philosophy he sticks to. No mention that Spurs got through a game against Man Utd without Romero, Van de Ven, Davies, Udogie, Bentancur, Odobert, Moore, Vicario, Werner and Richarlison. Leaving them with only Brennan Johnson and 6 academy players on the bench to choose from (2 of which are goal keepers). He was already playing a 17 year old midfielder at centre back by this point due to this injury crisis. What is he supposed to do here @GNev2 and @Carra23? Start telling Forster to hoof it up field, push his players up and allow Utd to exploit the space behind a make shift backline? It appears to be a lack of understanding of what situation Spurs are in with 10 first team players unavailable. Meanwhile, Pep, is hailed a genius whilst unable to adapt his system when he is missing 1 key player? Why is the narrative not on Pep Guardian for failing to adapt when he doesn't have all the world's best players available? Or does that not fit the narrative because you need to make Ange an Australian fraud who couldn't possibly be intelligent enough to come to the Premier League and be successful? Do your research guys. You have one of the most privileged jobs in football yet you came across like your levels of understanding to the situation around Spurs was that of a kid on social media.