
Comms: @SenatorAndyKim | Philly Guy | Army Vet | @LeedsAlumni | It's bigger than Nino Brown ✊🏾 | My tweets | past: @madeleinedean
Joined April 2017
- Tweets17.7K
- Following2.1K
- Followers2K
- Likes69.1K
Tim Mack retweeted
With Dems all but certain to prevail in Mississippi and Alaska, we're most likely looking at a 56D-44R Senate and a ~260D-175R House, which would be Dems' largest House majority since 1992.
Tim Mack retweeted
If you're able to apply any political label to any political candidate to win an argument, maybe the labels don't mean so much...
So dull.
Angie Nixon didn’t win her Democratic primary because of a weak state party. Voters chose her over a candidate who outspent her 10 to 1.
Also no one outside of the national media bubble saw her through the lens of “DSA,” which is part of the reason she beat back the GOP caricature of that label, and shows the limits of this sort of analysis.
Actual people chose an actual person — let’s start there
Ezra Klein on the electoral performance of El-Sayed, Peggy Flanagan and Angie Nixon:
Angie Nixon—I don't think there's any reason to look at the results and say it was a brilliant strategic move to run the DSA candidate in Florida.
Sometimes people take statements about electoral performance as moral statements about the worth of a candidate or the ideas. That's crazy in my view.
Tim Mack retweeted
Yesterday felt good for many reasons, but a big one is because, to me, it felt like the end of endless 2016. Something broke. And it didn’t fall neatly on ideological lines.
People are not interested in factional score settling. It’s just not productive.
Tim Mack retweeted
The Democrat factional fighting is a relic of 2016. This election points toward a new liberal fusionism, candidates who combine leftist economic populism with centrist pragmatism. Talarico and Ossoff offer a model on this. The factional stuff is old news, beltway chatter.

















