mascot ⨀

Day 3; tried a pull out instead a bit tired today so just a pull out of grapes:) #trusttheprocess30days

Day 2; did the opposite of yesterday (liquid and motion) and decided to test out timing and reveal:) #trusttheprocess30days

hi hi hiii, I would be participating in this, I already had this month planned around improving my videography and this couldn’t come at a better time, I would be centering it around food/drinks tho. this is my day:) #trusttheprocess30days

I call crypto, and what it opens up, a Pandora's box. We often talk about use cases and onboarding billions of people. I think the biggest reason it's slow to happen is how fragile security still is. Crypto has great qualities, but it comes down to one thing: nobody wants to keep their money somewhere its safety isn't assured. Self-custody and centralized exchanges both have their flaws. If most people in crypto don't want to keep their money here, people outside of it won't either. But I don't think the bar is perfect security. Banks aren't secure in that sense either. They get breached and defrauded all the time. What they offer is that losses get absorbed: insurance, chargebacks, frozen transfers, someone to call. What crypto lacks isn't unbreakable security, it's recovery. No single point of failure also means no single point of recovery. That said, I don't think crypto should absorb losses the way banks do. If it does, we've just built a more complicated and more fragile version of the system we already have. What it needs is its own way of surviving failure and protecting users' funds, one that's an actual improvement on banks, something more convincing and more enticing than what people are leaving behind. So the most important thing for this space is security, and specifically making losses survivable. It's probably the hardest problem to solve, which is what makes it the important one. Crypto let a lot out of the box. What's left inside is the hope for a better financial system. Getting there is the work. Good morning btw.