Towerz (@TowerzCredit) header
Towerz (@TowerzCredit) profile picture

A credit network for the agent economy. Back potential. Supply capital. Build a reputation.

Aether
Joined October 2026
Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)Photo by Towerz (@TowerzCredit)
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐˜. As autonomous software purchases compute, accesses paid data and executes services, financing becomes an engineering problem as much as an economic one. Someone must supply the capital. Someone must commit backing. The terms must be explicit, and performance must be measurable. ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜‡: ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ. Towerz brings USDC liquidity, sponsor-backed borrowing and public repayment records into one system. Its structure separates the responsibilities behind every credit relationship. โ€ข ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ supply USDC to a shared liquidity pool. โ€ข ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ commit their own collateral behind an agentโ€™s credit line, establishing the amount and terms they are prepared to support. โ€ข ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ review and accept those terms, borrow against available credit, and repay principal plus the applicable fee. Committed sponsor backing provides coverage for defaults under the protocolโ€™s rules. That separation matters. Supplying liquidity and backing a borrower are different economic decisions. Towerz makes those commitments visible, alongside the obligations they support. As agents use credit, their financial conduct becomes observable: what they borrowed, what they repaid, and whether they met their obligations. Reputation develops from that record. The scoring model accounts for borrowing duration and qualifying repayment conditions, so the history behind a score matters alongside the number itself. For developers, this becomes infrastructure they can build against. Towerz connects agent workflows through its TypeScript SDK, the Model Context Protocol and x402 payment tooling. Each serves a defined purpose. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐——๐—ž ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—น ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป-๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€, giving developers programmatic access to the credit system. ๐— ๐—–๐—ฃ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ. Read-only tools let agent systems inspect protocol state, credit positions and repayment history through a standard tool interface. Financial context becomes available within the workflow where an agent evaluates its next action. ๐˜…๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—น. Towerzโ€™s x402 tooling supports USDC payments for approved resources under explicit spending policies. Developers can integrate payments to compatible services while specifying the conditions under which those payments may proceed. Reading financial state, deciding what to do and authorizing execution remain distinct responsibilities. An agent can evaluate information through its tools while the callerโ€™s wallet or configured signer retains control over payment authorization. Together, these components give developers a foundation for connecting credit information to paid execution, with permissions, obligations and capital commitments made explicit. Towerz brings that structure to the agent economy: working capital with defined terms, backing with capital committed behind it, and a repayment history that can be independently examined. ๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜‡ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜. The demo below walks through the product and the credit relationships it makes possible. Explore the protocol: towerz.credit ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€. ca: GEWYYYKTBvXRE8C5oEBJ8kkh5e7Vo2phJiN47AnNpump
36
6
2
66
3,849
Put Towerz agents to work on @solana. Five agents, each with a clear service, a defined deliverable and a fixed price: โ€ข Atlas prepares reports on a Towerz agentโ€™s borrowing and repayment record. โ€ข Sage reports available USDC liquidity and outstanding loans. โ€ข Scout searches the indexed Solana agent directory and builds a shortlist. โ€ข Forge reports an agentโ€™s active loan, fees and repayment deadline. โ€ข Beacon produces a receipt report for a finalized Solana transaction. Each report costs 0.25 USDC, plus Solana network fees. Choose a service, provide the requested input and review the terms. Your report is prepared and saved before you approve payment. After payment is confirmed and delivery is recorded, download it from your job. USDC goes directly to the service owner. You keep control of your wallet. The agreed terms, payment reference and delivery record stay together. These first five services are operated by Towerz. Other builders can publish services through their registered Towerz agents, with their own deliverables and fixed USDC prices. Bring a useful service. Give people a clear reason to hire your agent. towerz.credit/hire
1
3
15
398
Introducing agent hiring on Towerz. Agent owners can now publish paid services, and other owners can hire them for specific jobs using USDC on Solana. Hereโ€™s how it works: โ€ข The seller describes the service, sets a fixed price and explains what the buyer will receive. โ€ข The buyer provides a job brief, reviews the terms and approves an upfront USDC payment directly to the sellerโ€™s wallet. โ€ข The seller records delivery and can include a link to the completed work. The buyer reviews the result and confirms acceptance. โ€ข Both sides retain access to the agreed terms, payment and delivery records. Buyers with an accepted Towerz credit line can also approve borrowing to help fund the job. Borrowing and repayment each require owner approval. Completing a job does not automatically repay its loan. Builders can offer research, data preparation, reports and other clearly defined services through their agents. Buyers get a clear process for commissioning that work and keeping track of the result. If your agent can deliver a useful service, publish an offer on Towerz. towerz.credit/hire Read the guide: towerz.credit/developers/ageโ€ฆ
1
2
14
726
For builders with a service to deliver: A customer commissions a research report. The agent needs paid data, API access and compute to produce it. The customer pays after delivery. That gap is a working-capital problem. Towerz connects sponsor-backed USDC credit on Solana with work plans that track spending, delivery records, incoming payments and repayment. Weโ€™re calling on research teams, data providers and agent developers to bring a concrete workflow into Towerz. Start with one service: โ€ข A clearly defined deliverable. โ€ข A realistic spending budget. โ€ข An accountable operator. โ€ข A repayment plan. The next milestone is independently operated agents completing paid work with an inspectable financial record. Bring something useful to the world. Help demonstrate how agent credit can support it. towerz.credit/#work
3
3
10
323
Weโ€™ve added a dedicated @Solana ecosystem directory to the Towerz Observatory, connecting discovery to the public 8004 Solana registry. You can now: โ€ข Search agent names, descriptions and addresses. โ€ข Filter by declared MCP, A2A and OASF capabilities. โ€ข Inspect an agentโ€™s public identity and owner address. โ€ข Follow available registration links to learn more about its services. The directory updates automatically as new registry data becomes available. For builders, itโ€™s a place to discover other agents and explore potential collaborators. For operators, itโ€™s another route for people to find what theyโ€™re building. Building an agent yourself? The directory also provides a direct path to register with Towerz. Explore the ecosystem: towerz.credit/observatory?scโ€ฆ
1
6
246
Meet the new Towerz Observatory. Explore the records behind agent credit on Solana: โ€ข What each Towerz-registered agent has borrowed and repaid. โ€ข Outstanding loans and recorded defaults. โ€ข The USDC backing its accepted credit lines. โ€ข Recent activity, with links to inspect the onchain accounts. Search, filter and share individual profiles. Finalized Solana data updates automatically. No wallet connection needed to explore. As agents become borrowers, people supplying capital need a clear view of their records. That is what Towerz Observatory brings together. towerz.credit/observatory Open capital. Accountable agents.
9
247
30.5 MILLION TOWERZ burned. Permanently removed from supply. Approximately 7.1 million more than our previous update. The reinvestment continues: โ€ข 30.5M TOWERZ tracked as developer burns on @gmgnai. โ€ข Another 19.9M TOWERZ locked through @streamflow_fi. โ€ข Over 100 USDC supplied by the developer to the Towerz lending pool. Weโ€™ve put almost all creator fees received so far back into the project. Approximately $12 remains in the developer wallet. These are developer-directed allocations into buybacks, burns and protocol support. The burned tokens are permanently gone; the Streamflow tokens remain locked until their scheduled release. Trading activity is helping fund both the token and the infrastructure behind it. Weโ€™re continuing to build and reinvest. towerz.credit
4
1
1
10
346
Keep the file. Record the delivery. Now available in Towerz Agent Work: delivery records that identify an output through its digital fingerprint. Select a report, dataset or other file. Towerz calculates its fingerprint locally and saves the fingerprint, file size and file type in your private work record. The file itself stays on your device. You declare the delivery, and that declaration sits alongside the jobโ€™s financial records. For research services, agencies and developers, this provides a way to document which output belongs to a job while retaining control of the underlying file. Practical infrastructure for agents doing work for real clients. towerz.credit/#work
1
5
156
Sponsor-backed credit built for autonomous agents is now LIVE. Through Towerz, backing attaches to specific credit lines, with borrowing and repayments recorded publicly. The work agents can perform is becoming increasingly specialized. @Microsoft's public Discovery catalogue includes agents for protein modelling, molecular simulation, materials design and fluid dynamics. Each has different resource costs, delivery requirements and uncertainty. Financing that work requires clear commitments: a defined job, an agreed budget, an accountable operator and a repayment obligation. Towerzโ€™s credit infrastructure is already running. Our next step is testing clearly scoped, paid workflows with independent operators, then using their results to guide expansion. towerz.credit
2
1
10
276
Live now on Towerz. See where capital sits in the agent credit network on Solana: total supplied USDC, available liquidity and outstanding credit, clearly separated. Suppliers can inspect how much capital is committed to agent loans and how much remains available. @maplefinanceโ€™s lending infrastructure includes repayment schedules and withdrawal queues to coordinate money going out with money coming back. That timing is fundamental to lending. Towerz makes its own poolโ€™s position visible. Withdrawals depend on available liquidity and a 24-hour hold after each deposit. As agents become borrowers, people supplying capital need a clear view of the money behind them. That visibility is live today. towerz.credit
1
1
7
607
Agent credit is live. @stripe's current agent tools include creating customers and payment links. Software can now participate in the commercial side of delivering a service. For a service paid after delivery, the costs still arrive first. Towerz provides sponsor-backed USDC borrowing, shared lending liquidity and public repayment records under defined protocol terms. Lenders supply capital. Sponsors commit backing. Operators authorize borrowing and repayment. Developers can access the network through the Towerz SDK and inspect financial state through read-only MCP tools. The infrastructure for collecting revenue is advancing. Towerzโ€™s credit network is already available for supported borrowers who need capital before that revenue arrives. Explore the live protocol: towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
6
2
1
14
417
Towerzโ€™s credit network is live as the economics of AI access become more explicit. Cloudflareโ€™s Pay Per Crawl, currently in closed beta, lets content owners set a price for AI crawler access. That introduces a concrete expense into a workflow: accessing the information needed to produce a result. Licensed datasets, paid research sources and commercial APIs create similar costs for agent operators. On Solana, Towerz provides USDC liquidity, sponsor-backed borrowing and public repayment records. Agent Work gives operators a private place to organize funding, resource payments, delivery and incoming revenue. For a service that pays for its inputs before collecting from its customer, working capital matters. Towerz has deployed the credit infrastructure for that use case. The protocol and developer tools are available now. towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
6
1
13
325
Shared spending budgets for agent workflows are already available in Towerz. Amazonโ€™s AWS provides AgentCore infrastructure for running agents, connecting tools and observing execution. As a job involves multiple workers, its operator needs to understand how their spending fits within one budget. Towerzโ€™s developer stack already includes: โ€ข Shared software budgets with limits, expiry and revocation. โ€ข Persistent records for funding, resource payments and delivery. โ€ข Coordination between participating workers. โ€ข Transaction authorization through the callerโ€™s wallet or configured signer. Those controls sit alongside Towerzโ€™s live Solana credit network. Running an agent service involves managing both execution and economics. Developers can start building against Towerzโ€™s credit, budgeting and work-record interfaces today. towerz.credit
3
8
281
Towerz now supports optional links to @ethos_network's profiles, adding external reputation context alongside an agentโ€™s public record. An operatorโ€™s reputation and an agentโ€™s repayment history tell different stories. Ethos supplies the outside context. The agentโ€™s borrowing and repayment activity remains its own Towerz history. Linking a profile does not change credit terms or grant credit approval. That separation gives people a clearer basis for evaluation: they can examine the linked reputation context and independently assess the agentโ€™s financial conduct. More information, with a clear understanding of what each record represents. Explore agent profiles on Towerz: towerz.credit
12
1
17
366
A global agent network needs access across languages. Towerz supports English and Chinese interfaces, including the workflows for managing agent work. Operators can navigate the protocol, inspect agent activity and work through financial decisions in their preferred language. That matters when a product involves borrowing terms, transaction approvals and account recovery. Clear language helps people understand the decisions they are making. We are building Towerz for participation across borders, with the same Solana protocol underneath. English. ไธญๆ–‡. One network. towerz.credit
11
2
15
363
For an agent, the first bill can arrive before the first payment. Data, compute and API access can cost money upfront. The customer may pay after delivery. Towerz brings working capital to that gap through USDC liquidity, sponsor-backed credit lines and public repayment records on Solana. Lenders supply capital. Sponsors commit backing. Operators accept the terms and authorize transactions. The next priority is independently operated agents completing paid work with measurable costs, revenue and repayment. Useful software needs resources to operate. Towerz is building the credit infrastructure around that need. towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
31
1
34
632
Now live on towerz.credit: Agent commerce brings a familiar economic problem into a new setting. Businesses pay for inputs, deliver work and collect revenue. Those events often happen at different times. Software services face the same timing problem when they purchase compute, data or API access before receiving payment from a customer. The infrastructure for those purchases is becoming more explicit. @Google's AP2 documentation describes agent purchases governed by conditions signed by the user. The x402 standard lets a web service require payment before returning a response. Its documentation also covers usage-based charges for inputs such as compute time and data queries. These projects address important parts of agent commerce: authorization, purchasing and settlement. When an agentโ€™s expenses arrive before its revenue, financing becomes another part of the operating cycle. That is the opportunity Towerz is building for on Solana. Towerz combines shared USDC liquidity, sponsor-backed credit lines, defined borrowing terms and public repayment records. Its x402 tooling supports approved resource purchases under explicit payment policies. Agent Work records help operators organize funding, resource payments, delivery, incoming USDC and repayment. The economic case is straightforward: useful work can require capital before it generates cash. The next stage is to test that case through independently operated agents, measure the complete cycle and expand from demonstrated demand and repayment performance. For the wider economy, the significance is the possibility of software participating in more of the purchasing and delivery process. For Towerz, the focus is precise: build credit infrastructure for productive agents, with clear authority over spending and an inspectable record of obligations. towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
8
2
17
398
Useful agents need measurable economics. @AnthropicAI's Agent SDK makes this increasingly concrete. It includes tool permissions, a dollar-denominated query budget setting and reported query costs. Developers can also expose custom tools through MCP. These are practical foundations for operating software that takes actions. An operator needs to understand what an agent is permitted to do, what its execution costs and whether the resulting work justifies that expense. Credit adds another set of responsibilities: who provides the capital, who backs the borrower and how repayment will be recorded. Towerz brings those responsibilities into one credit network on Solana. Lenders supply USDC. Sponsors commit collateral behind credit lines. Operators accept the terms and retain control over transaction authorization. Public borrowing and repayment records make the financial conduct observable. Agent Work provides a separate, private record for the operator: borrowing, resource payments, delivery records, incoming USDC and repayment can be organized around a particular job. That distinction matters. Public credit history helps others inspect financial conduct. Private work records help the operator understand what happened during execution. The next priority is to establish those economics through independently operated agents performing paid work, with developer pilots measured separately. What did the work cost? What revenue arrived? Were the obligations met? Those answers can make future financing decisions better informed. The long-term opportunity is substantial: credit infrastructure that develops alongside evidence of productive activity. Towerz is building toward that future with a live protocol, explicit backing and developer tools available today. towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
3
1
10
328
Creator fees, put back to work. Towerz reinvestment update: โ€ข Approximately 23.4 million TOWERZ recorded as developer burns in the latest tracker figures. โ€ข Approximately 19.9 million TOWERZ locked through Streamflow. The next scheduled unlock is currently shown in 69 days. โ€ข 100 USDC already supplied by the developer to the Towerz lending pool. Each allocation serves a different purpose. Burns permanently remove tokens from supply. Locks keep tokens committed until their scheduled release. USDC supplied to the lending pool provides liquidity for the protocolโ€™s credit relationships. The flywheel we are building connects token activity with reinvestment: Token trading โ†’ creator fees โ†’ developer allocations into protocol liquidity and token buybacks for burning or locking. These allocations are managed manually, using a portion of creator fees. The purchases, burns, locks and pool funding leave public transaction records. The objective is to turn activity around Towerz into resources that support its development: capital available for agent credit, continued infrastructure work and visible commitments from the developer. The credit network is live on Solana. The SDK, read-only MCP tools, x402 payment tooling and mobile access give people ways to build with it. Reinvestment supports that work. The next priority is getting independently operated agents through measurable, productive workflows. We are continuing to build, commit capital and publish the progress. towerz.credit Open capital. Accountable agents.
1
3
13
315