#MiguelSalgueroOlivares due process rights were violated. If you think what happened over the past 12 days in a North Carolina courthouse by means of admissible and legal evidence being presented to a jury to convict a man for murder in a cold case where IGG didn’t identify a killer; rather IGG identified the only single source partial profile that came from 5 sperm heads. (LE said was Planted through a used condom or identifies 3-5 day old consensual Sex) Miguel, like all of us, has the right to confront his accusers. This should include challenging the investigation and its decisions to employ non traditional LE techniques to “solve” the case. Miguel, should have been allowed, in front of the jury, question investigators why they turned to Investigative Genetic Genealogy? And How could identifying old sperm from days before Faith’s murder help solve her murder? The jury had a right to know that in 2014 - right before IGG was explored in 2015 by cHPD… investigators went a different route, and were unable to rule out the expert opinion and conclusion it received based on investigators explaining the crime scene, victimology, and statements from witnesses. Which was investigators wanted to test (by asking an expert) if it was possible for someone to plant genetic evidence of another from a used condom? How Miguel should have gotten this to be admissible was by pointing to the fact of the following: Miguel’s lawyers needed to argue that this wasn’t just “police/lay opinion” which would render it inadmissible and improper to present to the jury.. however.. These lay/police officers in 2013/2014 asked DNA and Lab expert Erin Ermish in 2014 if it was her expert opinion that the crime scene evidence could be consistent with a staged crime scene - by and through a used condom from an individual not associated with either girl and planted for the purpose to lead investigators down the wrong path? Ermish said YES, bc it was rare amount and just heads. This Couldn’t be ruled out. So why wasn’t Miguel able to elicit this expert opinion from Ermish in front of the jury and ask her in front of the jury what led to her being asked for an expert opinion on this matter? This was all shutdown by the judge in pretrial rulings. Miguel was unable to put on a complete defense. He was unable to explain the crime scene. He was unable to put on a third party culprit defense. He was unable to solicit expert opinion from the State’s own expert that pointed to a staged crime scene and Rosario being the only plausible person who was involved in this staging due to the timeline and chronology of events. How about Mistaken identification of who was in the bed/apartment at the time of the attack? This was not Faith’s apartment’s. The jury not being allowed to hear anything about Takoy Jones, Brandon Edward’s, Karena Rosario, etc.. as far as being involved in ANYTHING to do with the murder of Faith. (Even though Jones broke into the apartment, busted down two doors, and threatened to kill Faith if Karena didn’t get back together with him) The little time that had passed of this incident which resulted in a July 11, 2012 Restraining order, protecting the two girls from Takoy, was just weeks before Faith’s murder. No traditional law enforcement investigative techniques that are usually employed by SBI agents/CHPD and investigators to include tipsters, confidential informants led to THE IDENTIFICATION of Miguel as a person of interest. The jury needed to hear this. Why? Because the narrative/theory of what happened to Faith has been all over the place.. but no narrative truly included an SA. Rather it was the opposite, that Faith KNEW who her killer was and it was personal and so was the note/letter. So now truly think about how reckless it was of the prosecution/LE when they agreed to use IGG in this case, for the purpose to identify the 5 sperms that the investigators believed was planted and not the killer.. especially since SA kit neg.

Nate chambers pictured below is the officer who’s DNA is in faith Hedgepeth’s vehicle. On the parking lot 🅿️ entry ticket to the Wallace parking deck from 9/7/2012. The ticket in Faith’s car said 12:53am entry. Followed by Karena saying at 2:10am in a text to Faith … “where r u!?” In pretrial motions the prosecution claimed Faith and Karena walked out the club together at 2:07am. Funny that phone records would have Karena texting faith where are you at 2;10am if the prosecution is right.. Also the defense did not call Officer Evans from chapel hill police to tell the jury that she watched the Wallace parking garage video (that the state said didn’t exist on direct with Officer Walker) Funny.. only 3 cars exited the Wallace garage deck - matching Faith’s car according to Evans - and those 3 white cars were at 2:04am 3:12am and 3:18am.. Now who wants to talk to me about timelines and why the fuck this wasn’t presented to the jury.. also Karena’s cell phone was bouncing around like a ping pong ball on cell towers between 8:45am and 10:15am on the morning of Sept 7th when Karena said she was at Jordan’s the entire time. Jordan’s house was dialed into one tower in 2012. Why would Karena’s be jumping around to 5 towers yet staying at Jordan’s house!? Simple / it wouldn’t be. Take your DNA and shove it up your ass! These Defense attorneys can kiss my asd too! You fight to the very end regardless if Miguel ran out of money. Or was it Katie’s mom paying that bill!? Nate Chambers right after Miguel’s arrest in 2021 is awarded a lifetime achievement. Nate chambers the same dude who is black and who’s dna was in faith’s car…