The Englander

See. That's all you've got to say. You resort to these pathetic insults because your whole worldview isn't based on facts or reality. It's just weird outgroup preference and suicidal empathy for foreigners at the expense of your own people. Sex crime in the UK had gone up 700% in just over 20 years, directly coinciding with mass third world immigration. The same increases are replicated similarly across Europe by countries who've also opened their borders. Poland, who didn't import the third world, saw a decrease in sex crime. If you really cared about sex crime, you'd stop labelling white men as the root of all evil and stop advocating for third worlders who are assaulting women and girls at unprecedented rates. But you don't. You have foreign flags in your bio yet have the audacity to call me a "flag shagger". Embarrassing.

Yes. They are. The majority of crime, overall in Britain is committed by white people as they still make up around 82% of the population as per the last census 5 years ago (75.5% white British). The same way as in a majority black country, most crime is committed by Black people. But if you understand per capita, migrants, specifically those from the Middle East or Sub Saharan Africa, commit sex crime at far, far higher rates than native white British men. I'm sorry you're so uneducated on the topic and this is so damaging to your worldview, but given you've got "free Palestine" in your bio, I shouldn't be surprised.

You're a fucking imbecile.

The English people are a distinct ethnic group. That ethnic group is white. You cannot be black and English in the same way you can't be white and Japanese. Joanna Lumley was a 4th generation English woman in India - no one in their right mind would say she's Indian. Ethincity exists. The English are a distinct white ethnic group. The Nigerians are a distinct black ethnic group etc. "Mixed race" is already a category on the census. The English people should not have their distinct ethnicity diluted. Go fuck yourself.

You literally don't understand anything you fucking retard.

You are literally just lying you subversive foreign weirdo. Restore have said, from day 1 - illegals as well as legal migrants on benefits, in social housing, not working, who commit crime and don't speak English, will go. What Rupert has said here doesn't change any of that. Restore will be revoking all citizenships granted after 2nd November 2026. Reform will just be reviewing them. Restore will retroactively strip ILR from existing holders. Reform will not. Restore will be implementing a red list of countries who we won't import from. Reform will not. Restore will be effectively outlawing Islamic practice - banning Halal, the burqa, mass public prayer etc. Reform will not. Again, you're literally just fucking lying as always you absolute prat.

No. I'm not you utter retard. Reform will be issuing temporary rolling visas in place of ILR. Restore won't be and will even be removing ILR and stripping it retroactively from existing holders. Reform aren't banning Halal slaughter or public prayer etc. Islam will still effectively function as is in Britain. Reform aren't automatically revoking all citizenships granted after 2nd November 2026 like Restore, they're only reviewing them. Reform aren't bringing in a red list of countries that will be banned from importing people from and who cannot remain here. You are genuinely so stupid it's actually painful.

I want to preface this by saying anyone who commits rape should be punished to the fullest extent of the law and I'd personally bring back the death penalty for such offences. I also want to acknowledge that I fundamentally believe consent can be withdrawn at any time during sex, regardless of if it was given beforehand. With that being said, regarding the Russell Brand case, I find it troubling a person can be found guilty of a crime and sentenced to 10 years in prison on what effectively amounts to allegations, as evidence. There was: -No forensic evidence -No video evidence -No audio -No medical records showing injury -No witnesses to the crime itself -No police report until 14 years later The only "evidence" provided was the alleged victim's police report 14 years after the fact, and then testimony from friends and family based on what the alleged victim had told them herself. Again, I'm not saying she's lying, at all. However, for arguments sake, I could make up a crime that I was a victim to, tell 10 of my friends and family the exact same story, them all be able to corroborate the story between one another, yet it would all be based off of a lie I've told them. Crimes like these are notoriously difficult to prove (especially decades after the incident) - behind closed doors, no witnesses, no physical evidence etc. Because of this I can absolutely acknowledge that for victims it can be extremely hard for them to get justice in the event of rape, and that is genuinely awful. However, if I can acknowledge this then conversely, the opposite is also true - it is extremely hard for someone to disprove that they did not commit the crime if falsely accused. False allegations happen constantly, something people don't like to admit. Some notable examples are the Duke Lacrosse case from 2009 - Crystal Magnum, a stripper accused 3 men of rape. The case subsequently collapsed however, Magnum maintained her story and only admitted in 2024 that she made it all up. Or more recently - Francesco Parisi, a law professor at the University of Minnesota was accused by his partner Morgan Wright of domestic abuse and rape. Parisi spent 3 weeks in jail until it came out later that it was all a complete lie and Parisi was awarded $1.2 million dollars in a defamation judgement. I don't believe Brand is innocent. However, nor do I necessarily believe he is guilty. I simply do not know. Based on everything I've seen and all the details that I've researched, I've seen nothing to convince me there was enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed rape. Both parties acknowledge they had consensual sex. This was behind closed doors. No witnesses. No video. No audio. So quite how anyone can say that the alleged victim did not consent to a specific act (anal), during the previously consented to sex, and be sure enough of this to convict a man to 10 years in prison is beyond me. I've read comments on here with people saying "If you had a daughter, wouldn't you want justice for her if she was a victim of rape?" - Of course, I'd want the man to hang if I didn't get to him first. But what I'd also say to these people is, if you had a son, wouldn't you also want him to be able to sufficiently protect himself in the event of false allegations and have the burden of proof regarding evidence be sufficiently high, if he's being tried for such a crime? I would hope the answer be yes to both. Lastly, I'll just say again, I'm not saying I think Brand is innocent. Just that I've not seen anything that would lead me to believe a jury could decide, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he's guilty, when you're effectively trying to prove whether or not a "yes" or a "no" was given to a specific act, during consensual sex between two people behind closed doors with no witnesses. Also, I will say I find it curious how these Pakistani rape gang perpetrators were given lesser sentences than Brand for literally raping and trafficking children.

Curious...

Btw - RW tech bros?? Tech is fundamentally left-wing. You are embarrassingly uneducated and your whole ideology is a lie.

You're a fucking moron. The data is compiled by Grok dumbass. The sources are literally there for you to see - The Ministry of Justice, The ONS, The Met Police FOI requests, even Sky News (leftist establishment). This is what you people do. Your whole argument, ideology and worldview gets torn to shreds with verifiable statistics and you just say you don't believe the data. Absolutely retarded. Migrants are vastly over in sex crime statistics compared to non-native British people. Categorically. Unequivocally. Sexual crime in Britain has gone up 700% in 2 decades, directly correlating with mass, third world migrantion. Huge increases in France, Germany and Sweden too etc. Poland as an example, who hasn't engaged in mass migration, saw a decline in these crimes. Your ideology is literally facilitating the mass rape of our people at the hands of foreigners all because of your obsession with "diversity is our strength". You people are fundamentally evil.

Foreign nationals are categorically vastly overrepresented in sexual crime statistics in comparison to native Brits. This is inarguable. Also, considering the British state has handed out, on average around 180k British citizenships to Foreign over the past decade, the figures for migrant sex crime in Britain is massively diluted, considering these migrants are now classified as British citizens. So yes, unequivocally, migrant populations, specifically those from sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East are vastly overrepresented, per capita, in sex crime data. Sorry this is problematic for your worldview.