I did this 5 years ago. SO MANY people laughed at me when I told them this...
Catch up people. It's not too late to be ready for all the "emergencies" that are incoming.
Take note:
This is true for almost every problem, in almost every life.
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver.
Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître.
Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France.
La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
Tucker Max retweeted
This morning's talk with @TuckerMax and @_tommyspodcast regarding the path to manhood. Tommy has my genuine respect for taking all this on in public, in order to pursue his own path, while hearing what many need to hear.
It's been this way since post-WW2, which is why Eisenhower specifically warned against it in his Presidential exit speech.
If you doubt any of this, read "War Is A Racket" by arguably the greatest Marine America has ever had, General Smedley Butler, a 2x MOH recipient.
Those are just older proofs, the modern proofs are even more overwhelming.
So no, most people refuse to entertain this idea because the consequences are too horrible for them to ponder--it destroys one of the foundational beliefs that holds up their entire reality.
Explain to me how the recently-resigned US Director of National Intelligence can publicly state, today, that the wars in both Iran and Ukraine cannot be ended by Trump, no matter how hard he tries, because the "deep state" basically won't allow it, and the response from pretty much everyone is...**crickets**.
Is this something that everyone just knows and accepts?
That the US, and potentially the fate of the world, is NOT in the hands of the "Commander in Chief" or even Congress or the Senate, or the State Dept. or the Justice Department.
It's in the hands of a powerful group of unelected intelligence "types" who operate beyond oversight and behind the scenes. And they apparently want endless, destructive war.
Pat made my point better than I did.
Everything he wrote is right.
This is 100% correct.
The losing game these days is trying to play the game.
Doing anything you're "supposed" to do, following any of the socially codified paths - whether that's in work or with women - is the root to failure.
Why? Because the game is rigged and the competition is increasingly impossible. You can burn through your entire childhood and finances striving to get into an elite college, when an elite college is no longer a pathway to an elite job, and a elite job is not a pathway to a elite woman. Indeed, increasingly it is the opposite.
This is why nihilism is so rampant today - we still live under the old cultural norms that "if you do X, you'll get Y" when in reality that social contract doesn't exist anymore. You have to be the ABSOLUTE BEST statistically to compete against the crowd, and it's so hard to get to those lofty heights of status you usually lose your soul in the process. This is one of the things Clav is demonstrating, for instance; it doesn't matter if you max out all your stats, you still don't really win. You still don't feel fulfilled. The nature of getting there is so dehumanizing you are ruined for the prize you sought to begin with.
But that doesn't mean there is actually no way to win. It just means you have to start defining your own win conditions. It means making other people come into your reality, rather than you succumbing to theirs.
This is why the word I base my business around is Dynamic: driven, full of energy, and continuously changing. These days, you cannot play by the rules; you need to become a Dynamic Man in order to meet a Dynamic Woman - and ultimately develop a Dynamic Marriage. Indeed, you need to live a Dynamic Life if you want your life to mean anything.
And you do that by charting your own path and giving yourself fully and totally to it. You do what aligns with your growth; what expands your capacity, what excites you. You say Yes to the unconventional and No to the comfortable. You take asymmetric risks that your soul aligns with, rather than chicken out with the safe and predictable your mind tells you is "smart."
"Dynamic" ultimately means accepting the call to adventure, and making other people come into your reality, rather than you succumbing to theirs.
This may seem like fluff or obfuscation to some guys reading this, but it's not. I have worked with hundreds of men, and I can tell you without question the ones who end up almost universally getting the quality keepers (as well as having work that lights them up every day) are the guys who do not look to society, let alone women, for permission for how to live. They are creating their own story and inviting women to be a part of it, they do not need a woman to complete it. That doesn't mean they don't encounter bad faith women or experiences, but these don't faze or jade them. They brush them off and keep going; almost not noticing the "wasted" dates or months - because they didn't consider them a waste. They were just parts of the journey, which was getting better all the time.
In other words, while they are aware of what is cooked out there, they do not emotionally lock into this muck or identify as a victim of it. They do not look to politics or the economy or the dating market to tell them what their odds are; not because they are naive, but because they are not playing the game of averages. They are the n-1.
And this is what really matters. Because while the objective conditions genuinely are worse than ever, it has also never been easier to be the n-1. Truly, it has never been easier to break out of the matrix.
A lot of guys think they're "out of the matrix" because they're aware of how we're being conned; but escaping is having more than mental awareness, it's possessing emotional freedom. Dynamic Men do not despair; they invariably believe the best is yet to come. Because how could it not be? They're manifesting: the future is in their hands.
But it is very hard for most people to do this. They are used to social guardrails, for tasks to follow, boxes to check. They are defined by the collective; they do not know how to be individuals, or if they do, they resent the collective because they've been alienated.
Yet people will have to learn, especially as we move into the 2030s, and the fumes of the old world are extinguished. The only way you can stand out as everything becomes commoditized is to become someone so unique you are in a market all of your own. You need to have a story worth telling, a presence that can't be questioned - because it was earned.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't try to improve yourself, look good, etc. - but do these things because they are congruent with your own self-actualization and self-respect, not because they are what you "have to" do to meet a standard. Because really - if you actually have the aura that comes from living dynamically like this - it doesn't matter. No one will care if you're not 6ft, or if your hairline isn't perfect. Because you will have actual gravity, in a world where most people are just pretending.
People can say what they want online, but it's felt. And anyone who has it knows the results speak for themselves.
"For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away."
I met my wife in 2013, and at that point, it was very obvious (to me) that if I wanted a family with a good woman I needed to "get on a chopper out of Saigon" quickly.
I do feel bad for young guys, it IS different now and it IS way harder in so many ways.
But in different ways, it's also easier than its ever been.
There is so little competition now, because most men suck or have given up. If you decide to get your life straight and be awesome, you will stand out much easier than in my generation (when the default man had his life together and pursued women).
Because of this, the good women--and there ARE still many, truly, even if not as many as before maybe--will notice and will be easier to get because you will be a 1 of 1.
What this requires though is something that dating did NOT require in previous generations: courage.
Every young dude I seeing doing well now (and I know many) does the same thing:
They decide they're going to be awesome (in the best way they can be), and then stake their claim publicly. They boldly declare who and what they are (usually based in some form or another), and are not afraid to stand out from the mainstream.
They all get RAFTS of shit for that (though its from zeros, but its still shit).
But if they hold the frame, they win. And they win big.
I hate to sound like a motivational speaker, but this statement is true: your life is going to be what you make of it, and if you decide you can't win, then you won't, and if you decide you can, then you eventually will.
I used to ponder on giving omnibus dating advice, but realized I cannot.
I have been married to a big titty goth wife for 20 years now. She's pleasant, hard-working, hypersexual, and violently loyal. It as though I've been living in the luxuries of the Capital City, hearing about bandits and nightmare creatures ravaging the peasants in the countryside. "Just report their rudeness to your local authority", would be a callous and dismissive attitude.
When clients come to me and tell me their stories of the insanity, selfishness, and inflated entitlement, I believe them. Something terrible has changed in society. The only thing I can do is give general guidance on masculine frame and specific guidance to men based on their situation.
I am sorry for you all who could not get out on the last choppers in the early 2000s. You must be guerilla fighters now.
For our own kids, it's why we are identifying quality parents who appear to be raising quality children, because the old ways of matchmaking are the only way I can think of to *maybe* avoid the humiliation ritual that is modern dating.
Potential mates and their families must be screened and vetted by people you trust.
The only people who hate sluts are women.
This has been proven over and over, both anecdotally and with very rigorous data.
If you understand why, you can almost understand all human mating behavior from that one fact.
Sluts are the only reason a lot of guys have any sexual experience. They have historically given many average guys a very needed bump in validation that not only prevents them from crashing out when cooler guys are getting most of the sexual attention, but gives them the confidence to talk to women in general and ultimately treat them better / date them seriously.
That is why you have had, and will always have, sluts. That natural, 5% of the female population acts as a stabilizing mechanism, and ends up actually helping the rest of women. They are a small enough number than other women can shun them and still protect their sexual cartel; but they are sufficient enough that they can soak up latent sexual tension and keep the men peaceful and open to courting.
The problem is that today, most women - who are not dispositionally sluts - have been encouraged to behave like them. Unlike true sluts, who are generally happy to enjoy casual liaisons and move on without undue attachment, these women cannot help but have investment in the exchange (even if they are the one exerting power), which engrains in them both resentment and contempt for men, as well as sexual behavior / standards incongruence (i.e dual sexual strategy).
Most women, simply put, are not emotionally equipped to sleep around - and not just because they are all unable to handle being used, but because they are also unable to handle using. This is why you see so many of these women who initially feasted on what was available to them on the modern sexual marketplace eventually become prude and create all sorts of protective, controlling restrictions around sex (too little too late), or conversely treat sex fully transactionally.
Because these women really wanted love, yet the practice of giving and taking sex hijacked the main pathway for them to be cherished by the opposite sex and turned it into a weapon. In other words, these women decided to use their tool to pair-bond as a tool to fuel their ego and get power. Once this becomes a pattern it's hard to recover from - not simply the self-esteem loss at realizing how they squandered what was precious (you can win battles but never the war), but in how it blocks them from opening up that part of themselves again in good faith, after all the games.
In other words, they cannot only not trust men anymore, but themselves. It takes a lot of courage and humility on the part of the woman to put themselves out there romantically after this self-awareness, and it takes a man with a lot of both compassion and confidence to accept her. He cannot be a simp; she won't respect one after vanquishing so many of them. The man must be attractive, yet perceptive and patient enough to call her out her inevitable defense mechanisms and power games.
Suffice to say, most of these men - who are either taken or have other options - aren't interested. And that's why we have the dating market that we do today.
It took me decades to fully accept the truth of this statement:
Most people are nothing more than a soupy mix of opinions and random facts fed to them by their schools and screens.
There is no thinking because there is no actual self.
He's 100% right: kids are amazing, and if you have any inclination, do it for sure.
BUT--it was very important for me personally to wait until I was ready emotionally, AND I found a great woman to have kids with.
The smartest women I know abandoned modern feminism years ago.
It looks like the normies are waking up to what they saw years ago.
Sydney Sweeney is the funniest stress test feminism has ever encountered bc I was taught that tHE PaTriArChY reduces women to their bodies, denies them individual agency and imposes rules on female sexuality based on what everyone else thinks women ought to be. Meanwhile Sydney is independently wealthy, produces her own projects, owns businesses, chooses to monetize her own sexuality, gains power from doing it and appears completely uninterested in anyone’s permission. And somehow the feminist response is thousands of women materializing to explain that her body is AcksHuAllY a collective political resource and she has a responsibility to use it in ways they approve of bc otherwise she’s “setting women back 100 years” (fucking LOL)
So congratulations ladies! You defeated the patriarchy by becoming an enormous decentralized committee of women policing another woman’s sexuality, scolding her for appealing to men and reminding her that her individual choices must remain subordinate to what is best for Women As A Class.
Perhaps the funniest part is that the men supposedly enforcing this grand patriarchal system are mostly standing off to the side like “Sydney seems great, let her cook” while the Feminist Liberation Committee is furiously drafting new regulations for what she’s allowed to do with her own gigantic knockers.
Incredible operation. You guys are fucking killing it. Extremely boss babe. Very liberation. No notes.
AI getting good enough to perfectly fake anything is not bad, in fact it may be the best possible thing:
Once everyone realizes everything online is fake, the only thing to do is go back to those things that cannot be faked.
Well, either that or melt down into nothing, either is fine.
I can't tell you how many people were befuddled when I told them I was going to only eat meat that I raised on my land, or I hunted.
I tried to tell them the below was true, and they literally could not comprehend it.
The entire industrial food supply is poison.
Get out while you still can.
A former USDA scientist and whistleblower, Gerald Zirnstein, now grinds every pound of his own hamburger mear because he refuses to touch the stuff sitting in your local supermarket.
Why? In 2018 the USDA reclassified "pink slime" (officially called Lean Finely Textured Beef) as "ground beef".
Zero warning or disclosure to you, the consumer. That means it can now legally be mixed into any package of ground beef on the shelf.
What exactly is "pink slime"? It’s the leftover beef trimmings that used to go in dog food and cooking oil. The industry heats the waste, spins it in a centrifuge to separate the fat, blasts it with ammonia gas to kill bacteria, presses it into bricks, flash-freezes it, and then sells it back to you as “beef.”
Yes, I do too.
Ashley St. Clair claims Elon Musk told her he wanted ‘legion of children before the civil war’ in bombshell doc trib.al/zEf0Nsl
Tucker Max retweeted
All "red pills" must be integrated into a solution-oriented mental model otherwise they become poison pills for your soul. I have seen SO many guys who could have overcome their situations and made major contributions to reversing our state of things become despondent losers because they lost hope.
If you want to have a great life, the biggest red pill of all is "never despair" - because the moment you do, it becomes a foregone conclusion things will get worse for you.
It's notable that all these 'truth seekers' never want to take this red pill though, because it invariably involves HARD WORK


























