Community Manager || Content Writer || Business Developer || Contributor @Onboard3___ || GGMU.
Joined January 2026
- Tweets6.7K
- Following955
- Followers761
- Likes22.3K
Pinned Tweet
I think the real shift isn’t “killing Spotify” it’s making streaming just one channel instead of the main economic relationship.
Turning years of genuine fan support into tangible benefits (presales, exclusives, community financing) without forcing people to think about blockchain is the part that actually matters. Utility > speculation.
Curious how you see the balance between loyalty tokens (flexible rewards) and NFTs (membership/exclusivity) working in practice for mid-tier artists.
🎵 N01ZET PRESENTS — IN A NUTSHELL
🔥 COULD TOKENIZATION KILL SPOTIFY?
What if the next music revolution wasn't about how we listen to music…
But about who captures the value?
Spotify transformed music distribution.
Millions of tracks.
Global audiences.
Instant access.
Personalized recommendations.
But there's another side to the story.
Artists still struggle to finance their next album.
Fans spend years supporting their favorite musicians without receiving much recognition beyond listening statistics.
And the economics of music remain complex, with revenues distributed among platforms, labels, publishers and other rightsholders.
Now imagine something different.
🪙 Fans earn tokens for supporting artists.
🎟️ Tokens unlock concert discounts and presales.
💿 NFTs provide exclusive albums and collectibles.
🎤 Artists finance projects directly with their communities.
❤️ Loyal fans receive recognition and meaningful benefits.
🌍 Artists build economic relationships that extend beyond any single streaming platform.
This is what tokenization could bring to the music industry.
Not necessarily the death of Spotify.
But potentially the disruption of a business model where streaming is the primary economic relationship between listeners and artists.
The next music revolution might turn passive listeners into active supporters.
And that could change everything.
👇 Let's explore 12 ideas for the future of music.
📩 Are you an artist, record label, music producer or Web3 entrepreneur?
Contact us in DM to explore music tokenization with N01ZET and Supranova.
#MusicTokenization #Spotify #Web3 #CreatorEconomy #N01zet #Supranova
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Day 10/30
Spent almost the whole day in the hospital. No games, no grind. Just walked out grateful.
Showing up today looked like this. Thank God for always. 🙏
#trusttheprocess30days
Day 9/30.
Everybody on this earth is figuratively running. That’s why it’s called the human race 😂
Still showing up. 🙏
#trusttheprocess30days
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Is Web3 Gaming Actually Dead?
Everyone has an opinion on this. So I went and got the numbers from both Web2 and Web3. Some of them don't make my side look good.
Here's what the data actually says:
➜ Web3 has buried a lot of games. CoinGecko tracked 2,817 Web3 games launched from 2018 to 2023. By Nov 2023, 75.5% were inactive, with players down 99%+ from their peak.
➜ It got worse. ChainPlay checked 3,279 GameFi projects in Nov 2024 and found 93% dead. Average lifespan: 4 months.
➜ The money left. Web3 gaming VC funding went from about $4B in 2022 to about $360M in 2025.
Now Web2. Everyone says Web2 is the safe side. Is it?
➜ 19,112 games launched on Steam in 2025. 9,327 of them had fewer than 10 reviews. 2,229 had zero.
➜ Only 2.99% of 2025 Steam releases reached 1,000 reviews.
➜ 47.5% of 2025 Steam games sold fewer than 100 copies. The median game made $249.
➜ On mobile, the median game keeps less than 1% of its players after 30 days.
➜ Big budgets die too. Highguard lost 90% of its players in its first week and was shut down after 45 days. 52 games went fully offline in the first five months of 2026.
➜ The builders are hurting as well. 28% of game industry workers were laid off in the past two years.
So here's the honest answer.
Web3 does not have a better survival rate. On the numbers we have, it's worse. And Web3 builders are a tiny group. Only 0.4% of devs in GDC's 2026 survey used blockchain monetization at all.
But most games dying is not a Web3 problem. It's a gaming problem. Web2 just doesn't put a price chart on its failures.
Web3's real mistake was selling tokens and NFTs before shipping fun games. When the money dried up, there was no game left to hold the players.
It's still not zero though. Even in a bad 2025, gaming was the biggest category on-chain, with 4.66M daily active wallets in Q3.
What's left now is smaller and more honest. Less hype, fewer teams, and the ones still building have to win on gameplay. Same rule as Web2.
Web3 gaming isn't dead. Web3 hype is.
Build something worth playing and gamers will show up. They always have. 🎮
Which number surprised you most? 👇
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
What happens when your heroes are more than just characters, your token has a purpose, and your game rewards have a separate funding source?
That’s the idea behind the Genesis Heroes, $RBHH and the Sherwood Vault in @RBHHeroes.
Here’s how the three pieces fit together. 🧵🏹
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
run a group?
post crypto content?
talk sports betting?
@dopexyz is offering all of you a paid monthly partnership.
DM them with your page or community to talk details.
Meanwhile, sign up here: dope.xyz
Finally, something worth sharing.
Group owners, crypto influencers and sports betting influencers: Dope has a paid monthly partnership offer for every one of you.
DM @dopexyz to instantly get an offer.
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Understanding DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations)
Let's go deeper into each part of the thread so you can understand DAOs properly and explain them confidently to your audience.
What Is a DAO?
DAO means Decentralized Autonomous Organization.
It is a form of organization where people coordinate around a shared purpose using blockchain technology, smart contracts, and agreed governance rules.
In a traditional organization, decisions are usually made by a management team, CEO, or board of directors.
In a DAO, members may participate directly in decisions through discussions, proposals, voting, and contributions.
Simple example:
Imagine 100 people decide to create an online community to support blockchain developers.
They agree to:
Raise funds for development projects.
Allow members to submit funding proposals.
Let eligible members vote on proposals.
Publish treasury transactions for transparency.
That community could operate as a DAO if its structure and governance are designed around those principles.
Important distinction: A DAO does not necessarily mean there are no leaders. Some DAOs have core teams, administrators, developers, or delegates. The important question is how much authority is distributed among members.
Key lesson: A DAO is not simply a group chat or a crypto community. It is an organized system for coordinating people, decisions, and sometimes shared resources.
🤝 Paid partnership
Understanding Crypto Governance and How Voting Works
Crypto governance is one of the important ideas behind decentralization.
It explains how decisions are made, who gets to participate, how proposals are approved, and how communities can influence the future of blockchain projects.
Think of it as a decision-making system for a crypto ecosystem.
Let's examine each part with simple examples.
What is crypto governance?
Crypto governance is the process through which decisions about a blockchain or decentralized application are proposed, discussed, approved, and implemented.
In traditional organizations, decisions are usually made by executives, directors, or management teams.
In decentralized projects, some decisions can be opened to community participation.
For example, imagine a DeFi protocol wants to reduce its transaction fees.
Instead of allowing only its development team to decide, the project may submit the proposed change to its governance community.
Eligible participants can discuss and vote on it.
Governance can cover decisions such as:
Changing protocol rules or parameters.
Allocating treasury funds.
Introducing new features.
Adjusting fees or reward mechanisms.
Funding developers and ecosystem projects.
An important distinction: decentralization is not always absolute. Some projects give communities significant control, while others retain important powers with founders, developers, or designated administrators.
Therefore, always investigate who actually has decision-making authority.
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
he got the entire set doing it within about four minutes 😅 #tryfirefox
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Have you ever tried the Blue Dogs on @1win? 😂
It's one of those games where you never really know what to expect next. You go in curious, watch how things unfold, and before you know it, you're fully invested in the next round.
I think that's what makes it interesting. Every round brings a new moment, and you never know how the next one will turn out
Just play within your limits and enjoy the experience.
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Watching the BTC chart tonight? Your futures balance can earn at the same time.
Here is how the APR on @MEXC Futures Earn works. It has two parts.
✓ The base APR is 5%.
✓ Add up to 15% bonus APR on topand the total goes up to 20%.
The bonus is different for each person. It depends on your position value.
A bigger position can reach a higher tier. A smaller one may get less.
So your number may not match your friend's.
To begin, switch on Auto Earn one time.
Then any eligible balance of 100+ USDT starts earning by itself. You don't need an extra subscription.
Interest builds every hour and is settled once a day.
It covers eligible USDT and USDE contract pairs, including TradFi-related pairs.
Keep trading the way you always do.
Rates can change, so check the event page before you start.
mexc.com/earn/futures-auto-e…
#MEXCSquad #ad #MEXC
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
My morning routine is pretty predictable. Coffee, Telegram, checking messages and sending a few funds to friends most time actually 😂.
But there's something I've never really liked about making those transfers on public blockchains. Anyone who knows your wallet address can look up your transactions, see where your money goes and even check your balance.
That's one reason I decided to apply for the @SNVROfficial testnet.
SNVR brings private payments directly into Telegram, which makes the whole idea more interesting to me. I don't have to switch between different apps to chat and make payments.
It's built on Oasis Sapphire, keeping balances and transfers confidential. GhostSwap handles swaps, while the Relay Engine routes transactions through multiple paths to make it harder to connect senders with receivers.
Another thing worth mentioning is that privacy doesn't mean you lose control. If you ever need to prove something to an exchange or partner, you can sign with your wallet and choose what information to disclose.
I like that approach. Not everything about my finances needs to be public just because I'm using crypto.
The testnet is accepting only 100 participants, applications close this week, and testing will run for two weeks. There are also points that convert to $SNVR, with extra rewards for top testers.
I've put in my application. If you've been looking for a more private way to handle crypto payments, this might be worth checking out.
Apply below
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
different countries, different cultures, different languages, yet we all find a way to connect on q lounge.
that's the beauty of a global community. you don't need to speak the same language or share the same background to feel welcome. what matters is the willingness to interact, share ideas and grow together.
q lounge makes that connection feel natural. we're different, but we're building in the same space.
@maiqfinance
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
People often judge a blockchain ecosystem by the number of applications built on it.
But there's another question worth asking:
How easy is it for developers to actually build there?
Starknet has been developing an ecosystem of tools designed to make that process more accessible.
Think about the different pieces:
→ Cairo gives developers a language for writing smart contracts.
→ Starknet Foundry provides tools for testing and developing those contracts.
→ Starknet.js and other SDKs help applications communicate with the network.
→ Dojo provides a framework for building onchain games.
→ Katana offers a local sequencer environment for development and testing.
These tools serve different purposes, but they contribute to one bigger goal: giving builders the infrastructure to turn ideas into working applications.
And that's something I think deserves more attention.
A blockchain's potential isn't measured only by what its core technology can do.
It's also measured by what developers can create with the tools available to them.
I'm curious: if you were building your first application on Starknet, which area would interest you most - DeFi, gaming, payments or something entirely different?
@Starknet
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
I told y'all I was cooking. Found this while exploring @meetmotes...
I've been talking about what Motes can do, its AI agents, trading capabilities and the level of control users have.
But here's a question worth asking:
What actually happens when a Mote's AI agent wants to make a trade?
Does it simply decide what to buy and execute immediately?
Not quite. There's a process behind every trade, and I think it's worth understanding.
Let's break it down. 👇
1. Mandate: You give the instruction.
Everything starts with you.
You describe what you want your AI agent to do in one sentence.
Think of it as giving someone a job and explaining what they're allowed to do.
2. Policy: Your instructions become rules.
Your mandate is compiled into a policy containing specific limits.
For example, you can establish spending boundaries and other conditions the agent must follow.
You sign this policy once.
3. Proposal: The agent suggests a move.
Now the AI agent gets to work.
It reads the available information, analyses opportunities and proposes a trade, including its reason for making that move.
But proposing a trade doesn't mean it can automatically execute it.
4. Check: The account verifies everything.
This is where the security mechanism comes in.
The smart account checks the proposed action against the rules you approved.
Does it fall within the permitted limits?
If it doesn't, the transaction cannot proceed.
5. Execute: The trade happens within your limits.
Once the proposed action passes the checks, it can be executed.
If it doesn't meet your conditions, it doesn't go through.
Simple.
6. Ledger: You can see what happened.
The process doesn't end after execution.
Every move is logged, itemised and made visible through a ledger you can review.
You can see what happened instead of simply trusting that your agent did the right thing.
Now, here's what I find interesting about this approach.
Motes isn't just exploring how AI can participate in financial markets.
It's designing a process where the AI proposes, your rules define the boundaries, the smart account checks, and the ledger keeps track.
In other words, giving an AI agent the ability to act shouldn't mean giving it unlimited freedom.
And that's an important distinction.
What do you think about this six-step approach?
Giving an AI agent the ability to act is exciting, but giving it the right boundaries is what makes things even more interesting.
With @meetmotes, user permissions and control are part of the conversation.
There's more to unpack here.
I'll be sharing more about this tomorrow
Have a nice day
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Top 7 Best Movies to Watch in 2026
These standout films are highly recommended and well worth adding to your watchlist. Be sure to check them all out, and let me know which one you’re watching first.
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
not her snapping straight back into character on take one 😅 #tryfirefox
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
EPISODE 5: WHAT DOES IT COST TO TRADE WITH HYPESIUM?
Good evening, creators.
We've looked at how @Hypesium helps traders enter launches, manage positions and monitor other wallets.
But there's another detail worth understanding before using any trading bot.
The fees.
Speed and features are important, but traders also need to know what each transaction costs them.
So, let's break down Hypesium's fee structure.
01 → Trading fee
Hypesium charges a 1% fee on successful buys and another 1% on successful sells.
That means the cost applies when a trade succeeds, rather than simply because you attempted a transaction.
02 → Network gas
The trading fee isn't the only cost to consider.
You also pay the required network gas for transactions on Elysium.
Gas is separate from Hypesium's 1% trading fee, so it's important to account for both when calculating your actual trading cost.
03 → Referral discount
There's also a discount for users who join through a referral.
Hypesium advertises a 10% discount on its trading fees for referred users.
It's worth checking that the referral is properly applied before trading.
Why does this matter?
A bot can help simplify execution, but frequent trading costs can add up.
For example, someone making several small trades needs to consider how the buy fee, sell fee and network gas affect the overall result.
That's why I think understanding the fee structure is just as important as understanding the features.
Don't only ask how quickly a bot can execute a trade.
Understand what you're paying to use it too.
More Hypesium features to explore in the next episode.
@starlisting
🤝 Paid partnership
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
The real challenge for institutional DeFi is not simply getting financial institutions to use blockchain. It’s making sure they don’t have to change how they protect sensitive business information just to participate.
Think about how traditional financial operations work. Institutions handle private records, internal risk assessments, customer information, and transaction histories. Moving these activities into an environment where everything is publicly accessible introduces a completely different set of concerns.
@primus_labs is exploring how this gap can be addressed through confidential verification.
Instead of requiring institutions to publish their underlying records, the idea is to let other parties check whether specific information is valid without gaining unrestricted access to the original data.
This creates an interesting possibility for DeFi:
1. Financial institutions can use information from existing offchain systems.
2. Applications can verify relevant claims before approving certain activities.
3. Sensitive financial records don’t have to become public just to establish trust.
What’s important here is the connection between traditional financial infrastructure and blockchain applications.
Institutional participation will require more than faster transactions or deeper liquidity. It needs systems that respect how financial information is handled while still allowing independent verification.
That’s the area where Primus is positioning its technology.
Explore Primus and complete XP tasks: s.kaito.ai/bDSr00H
@primus_labs
🤝 Paid partnership
Uncleṣile(No Relations) retweeted
Attraction is not always as straightforward as people think.
Sometimes the signals are clear. Other times, there is uncertainty, and understanding the difference between genuine interest and assumptions matters.
Knowing how to read social situations is an important part of developing better social skills.
Michael Sartain breaks down the dynamics in this clip.
What do you think matters most when understanding attraction?
@SartainPodcast