Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark) header
Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark) profile picture

I support XBT. Secessio plebis.

Joined February 2022
Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)Photo by Mark XBT (@UsuallyMark)
Mark XBT retweeted
CAPTURE Part 4: THE MACHINE The fourth and final installment is out. Bitcoin Magazine wasn’t just covering the fight over Bitcoin’s future. Its parent operated an Ordinals trading desk, invested in businesses tied to the ecosystem, and maintained editorial policies that exempted parts of that same business. Then came an $80,000/month marketing contract, with an option for Nakamoto Inc. to buy BTC Inc at a valuation tied to its earnings, in a window that included the OP_RETURN fight. Nakamoto exercised the option. Readers were not consistently told about these commercial relationships. A documented investigation into the commercial interests and media infrastructure surrounding the Bitcoin Core controversy. citadel21.com/the-machine
38
157
43
479
52,889
hodlonaut's CAPTURE series is investigative journalism at its best, and the latest piece shows why it matters. In June 2025, Bitcoin Core merged a change lifting the default limit on OP_RETURN data over sustained objection from many node operators. A major Bitcoin publication covered that fight while its parent company's fund held stakes in businesses the change favored. The parent was also under a contract that tied its sale price to its earnings from those months and barred it from discussing the relationship with the press. The publication's disclosure page promised quarterly updates. The last one is dated March 2024. Almost all of it was on the public record. Readers just never had it in front of them, and it took four articles to put it in one place, because nothing in the structure asks anyone to. What he documents in practice, I have been documenting structurally at secsov.com. Bitcoin's development runs through a handful of merge keys on one implementation, with no independent specification of its rules. Its funding is concentrated in a small number of funders. There are no binding rules for conflicts of interest and no consequence when one goes undisclosed. A record nobody is obligated to act on protects nobody, so outsiders end up catching each conflict by hand, after the fact, one at a time. His series shows what a single round of that costs. None of this requires bad people, and these are not bad people. Good people inside that structure will keep producing what his series records. Bitcoin Commons (@BtcCommons) goes past research and documentation. It is a full stack built to replace that structure, and it is not a toy node or a technical curiosity. The node is built from the Orange Paper, a formal specification of consensus that no single codebase owns. On funding, we are building @joinplebly, which is designed to open development funding to the people who run and depend on the software, so a few large donors are not deciding what gets built. A new coordination model for the codebase commons keeps power visible and accountable to the people who depend on it. And @DecodeBitcoin, an AI review layer built on seventeen years of Bitcoin's development record, acts as a neutral arbiter that judges every change on its merits and keeps getting sharper on Bitcoin over time. Each piece targets a specific failure, the ones I have mapped in the structure and the ones hodlonaut keeps finding in practice. Bitcoin will always have stewards. Commons is built so they answer to the people running the network.
CAPTURE Part 4: THE MACHINE The fourth and final installment is out. Bitcoin Magazine wasn’t just covering the fight over Bitcoin’s future. Its parent operated an Ordinals trading desk, invested in businesses tied to the ecosystem, and maintained editorial policies that exempted parts of that same business. Then came an $80,000/month marketing contract, with an option for Nakamoto Inc. to buy BTC Inc at a valuation tied to its earnings, in a window that included the OP_RETURN fight. Nakamoto exercised the option. Readers were not consistently told about these commercial relationships. A documented investigation into the commercial interests and media infrastructure surrounding the Bitcoin Core controversy. citadel21.com/the-machine
5
22
1
120
2,630
said that last year, saying it again. vibes coding is a slur.
it’s clear we need to retire the term vibe coding because the models now produce better architecture & way more coherent code than an average software engineer. perhaps even better than top software engineers too because unlike a human, ai has a much much larger context window. this ain’t vibe coding at all. it’s precision engineering.
204
136
34
2,724
264,364
Mark XBT retweeted
CONVOY is excited to officially re-launch our pool. Originally known as Eligius, and successor to OCEAN, CONVOY continues the decentralization mission. DATUM Gateway, now under CONVOY's stewardship, has finally released 0.5.0beta, updating it for Bitcoin's new proof-of-work algorithm, and the many features that come with it. 🚀 DATUM is an open-source protocol that lets miners truly solo mine, building their own block templates, while still participating in pooled reward sharing. It’s crucial for mining decentralization, and used by most of the network today. Download DATUM Gateway v0.5.0beta now in the links below!
11
52
7
184
7,855
Starting today, all Steak n Shake buns are officially seed-oil free. The buns are now unapologetically drenched in pure Grade AA Wisconsin butter. The grass-fed, grass-finished Steakburger in a seed-oil-free bun is a new level of quality. Steak n Shake is breaking new ground with tastier, healthier options at affordable prices. 🇺🇸 MAHA 🇺🇸
1,562
5,427
422
44,366
800,544
Replying to @zndtoshi
. . .and increase coinbase maturity requirements. Have fun staying core
3
17
77
833
#OctoberSurprise this new life is thanks to everyone who fought for my freedom
5,927
21,726
1,110
224,118
3,595,208
"Bitcoin Knots 29.4.2.knots20260508 released, further mitigating the ongoing attack! 🎉 Be sure to read the release notes and verify your download(s)! bitcoinknots.org/?29.4.2.202…" ~Luke This is a softfork client to extend the coinbase maturity period. Excited to see it's effect!
5
18
1
73
1,833
An all-in-one node + wallet + mining stack for the BLAKE2b proof-of-work fork of Bitcoin (XBT). Regular wallets can't even see this chain. Oracle Knots does: run a fully verifying node, spend your XBT, and mine your own blocks — DATUM, no Stratum v1, ever — all from one Control Center. Sovereign by default. Don't trust, verify. 👉 github.com/MarcanoFilms/orac…
4
18
3
80
2,015
The stack: - Oracle Knots 29.4.1 — unpruned, txindex, fully synced BLAKE2b chain - Fulcrum (BLAKE2b-patched) — full Electrum protocol indexer - Self-hosted on modest hardware, 24/7 This is the first public Electrum server for the BLAKE2b fork. Standard Bitcoin wallets can't connect — they reject v2 headers. You need Shrike (Sparrow fork with BLAKE2b support). github.com/MarcanoFilms/orac… github.com/MarcanoFilms/Fulc…
2
7
22
507
Mark XBT retweeted
Being wary of bitcoin-b2b is reasonable. Wanting it to fail and participating in circle jerk uninformed dunking is retarded. What's happening is an experiment that everyone should be interested in: Can spam and miner centralisation be solved when the intention exists?
17
14
95
2,184
Bitcoiners care about mining centralization. SHA-coiners don't understand why
6
14
89
1,521
Mark XBT retweeted
It's *not* an inside job. Andy wasn't running a Ponzi Scheme and Blockstream absolutely did *not* pull off a fake hack, stealing their own money and giving it back to themselves minus the money they needed (~$50m or so) to keep the game of musical chairs going. It's totally a thing for a "white hat" to take a $50m cut for themselves.
47
109
14
585
32,557
Mark XBT retweeted
Replying to @Excellion @elonmusk
Samson he sees that Bitcoin has become a CBDC under guys like you. This post is hinting that he knows, bullish Bitcoin on the Blake2B algorithm.
1
5
14
206
Mark XBT retweeted
This is the first time I mostly hold BTC as an investment. For the NGU. Before, it was the biggest no-brainer far beyond that. It was the exit. The rock solid, unfuckable-with store of value. Separation of money from state. No third parties. Sovereignty. Digital truth in the form of a lean monetary ledger. Those qualities have, in my opinion, eroded a lot. Slow capture. More centralization. More relativizing and fiatizing of what Bitcoin is for. And there are seemingly no brakes. Just cheering when the people who still wanted Bitcoin to be money, not data storage, lost. Nodes decide, not miners. That used to be shared ground. Now it will get you ridiculed. I do not see the current trajectory, governance capture, or mining concentration reversing, not with the current attitude and behavior from the suits, the influencers and the social layer in general. That is why my faith in the project today is much weaker than it used to be. I am not calling the Blake2b chain Bitcoin. I am glad the fork happened. It is a live attempt to reassert principles a lot of us thought were settled: monetary protocol, hostile to spam, nodes enforcing rules, miners do not get to veto by selling block space for JPEGs and other non-monetary use. Whether it works at any meaningful scale is unknown. The energy around it is real. That resonates more with me than victory laps from people who treated BIP-110 as a joke and then celebrated when centralized hashpower blocked it. My position: I am not selling my BTC. I am not telling anyone else to sell. I intend to hold both sides for now. Nobody should be buying or selling either side of this split yet. The dust has not settled, liquidity is a joke, and rushed claim tools are how you lose funds. I urge everyone to make their own, well researched and responsible decisions. Most of my attention and interest now goes to the chain that still treats spam as spam, instead of inviting more of it and saying the debate is settled.
221
118
46
744
93,017
10
50
3
464
11,410
Mark XBT retweeted
Pollinating California's almonds takes almost every commercial honeybee in the United States, and in the winter of 2025 the beekeepers lost 62 per cent of them on the way. Step one. Clear the ground. California grows around 80 per cent of the world's almonds across 1.4 million acres, most of it planted within a generation over rangeland and mixed farmland. The orchard floor is sprayed to bare dirt. Nothing flowers there and nothing nests there, and for eleven months of the year it is one of the quietest places in American agriculture. Step two. Find the water. An almond takes roughly 1.1 gallons, and the tree drinks every year of its 25 year life whether there is a drought on or not. Almonds account for close to a tenth of all agricultural water use in the state. When the surface allocation is cut, growers drill, and the valley floor has been sinking for decades. Step three. Import pollinators, because you removed the ones that lived there. Almonds cannot pollinate themselves. An acre needs two colonies, so the bloom needs 2.8 million of them, which is virtually every managed hive in the country. There is no second option and no reserve. Step four. Load them onto lorries in Florida, Texas and the Dakotas and drive them across a continent. It is the largest movement of livestock on earth and it exists to fertilise a nut. Stack them at densities no bee evolved for, so that every mite, virus and spore in American beekeeping is introduced to every other one, annually, on schedule. Step five. Spray them while they work. Fungicides go on during bloom because the crop is worth too much to risk. The label says it is safe for bees. The beekeepers have been saying otherwise for twenty years. Step six. Feed them syrup. A monoculture flowers for three weeks and then offers a colony nothing at all, so the industry keeps its livestock alive on sugar and protein patties for the other forty-nine. Step seven. Count the dead. Beekeepers had come to accept losing 30 per cent a year. Then February 2025 arrived and commercial operators had lost an average of 62 per cent, some of them close to everything. 1.6 million colonies, $600 million, the worst losses ever recorded. Lorries pulled into Fresno with half the boxes already silent. Step eight. Shake the trees. Mechanical shakers drop the crop onto the dirt and the valley disappears into dust for weeks, in a basin that already has the worst air in the United States. Step nine. Feed the hulls to cattle. The waste goes into dairy rations, so the almond industry is quietly propped up by the animal almond milk was invented to replace. Step ten. Blend two per cent of it with water, add a gum from Rajasthan, chalk for the calcium and a synthetic B12, and print a leaf on the carton. The cow eats grass and pollinates nothing, because she does not need to. She is the ethical problem. The system that required every bee in America and killed two thirds of them getting there is the solution.
42
348
38
975
34,477
Mark XBT retweeted
“BCH. BSV. Fork. Shitcoin. We’ve seen this before” There is a term for this… a thought-terminating cliché. You take a complicated question, attach a familiar label to it, and suddenly the label becomes the answer. I like calling these manipulations out because once they’re named, the spell breaks and they lose their power. There is a whole feedback loop at play that turns a historical precedent into a substitute for thinking. Once the label is accepted, you no longer have to ask why this fork exists, whether the incumbent changed, whether the threat model changed, or whether the comparison is structurally valid. All nuance gets ignored. “Shitcoin” is doing the work of both a genetic fallacy and poisoning the well. BCH failed. BSV failed. Bitcoin Gold failed. Therefore “forks fail.” But “it was a fork” is a category, not a causal explanation. Different circumstances get collapsed into one label and treated like a law. It’s an incredibly shallow inference, but repetition gives it power. I can manufacture an equally persuasive argument in the opposite direction.. Luke has saved Bitcoin many times: the 2013 chain split, SegWit’s soft-fork path, UASF against miner veto, the 2018 inflation bug…and he has spent 15 years finding problems most people notice only after they become crises. I could easily say: “Bitcoin’s guardian angel has saved Bitcoin many times before. Therefore he’s saving Bitcoin again now” Frankly, it has at least as much historical precedent behind it as “BCH failed, therefore this fork fails.” But it doesn’t prove anything. That’s the point. A false analogy gets repeated until it becomes familiar. Familiarity starts feeling like truth. Prominent people repeat it. Mockery attaches a social cost to questioning it. Fewer people seriously examine the new case, and fewer still are willing to defend it publicly. Eventually a contingent historical outcome starts feeling like a law of nature, and the fact that fewer people challenge it creates the appearance that everyone agrees. The social reaction can literally help manufacture the outcome that people later point to as proof it was inevitable. None of this requires centrally coordinated propaganda. These mechanisms arise organically in groups. But they can also be deliberately exploited through repetition, labeling, ridicule and status pressure, and I have watched it happen clear as day in Bitcoin. This is how social engineering happens. There are voices in this space whose practical role seems to be almost entirely narrative… establish the frame, repeat the labels, amplify the approved interpretation, ridicule the people outside it, and steer what people unconsciously accept.
26
76
14
236
11,506