Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
We are at @acadofideas today to launch our new report Welfare vs Ideology, which examines how Britain’s leading children’s charities have abandoned their founding principles to promote contested LGBT ideologies using public funding.
Come and grab a free copy!
#BattleFest
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Pleasure talking to @VisionTony of @c4mtweets about the demographic crisis, AI, childcare and more. Watch here:
youtube.com/watch?v=Ilu99COn…
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
It is a good idea to remove cliff edges like this that create perverse incentives for aspirational people.
BUT
This does not change the fact that our current childcare policy is anti-choice, economically illiterate and bad for children.
A system that offers help to parents only if they hand over their nine-month-old to the State is not conservative. The reason most mothers return to work as soon as possible is not because they’re desperate to put their babies in institutional childcare; it’s because the cost of living is so high that most families now need two incomes to survive.
The majority of mothers of small children, when surveyed, say they would prefer to work less when their children are small. A conservative policy would pay a childcare allowance/tax break that parents could use as they see fit - to work fewer hours, use informal childcare or pay for formal childcare.
Conservatives should also recognise that the primary value of a mother is not found in her ability generate a short-term GDP boost for the Treasury bean counters.
Our current childcare policy is also a wonderful example of the idiocy of socialist economics. The state pays a fixed price for a good (in this case, hours of childcare) that is less than the cost of production and then wonders why there is a shortage of the good. 🤔
Childcare places also cost more than the average mother who returns to work pays in tax. If encouraging mothers back into the workplace is the aim, this is a ludicrously expensive way of doing it.
Yet conservatives seem deeply confused about the aim of ‘childcare’. Is it to get parents back to work or is it about early childhood education?
Whatever it is, the current arrangement is harming our children. Long hours in institutional childcare before age two are linked to emotional and behavioural problems later in life. This is not rocket science - babies need a strong and consistent attachment to their mother in order to be able to learn to regulate their emotions and be psychologically secure. State-funded childcare is therefore a false economy if it makes children less productive later in life.
By all means, remove cliff edges. But if the Conservatives are the party of the family, then they should overhaul childcare policy to put the family first. The current system views individuals purely as economic units - and that is socialism, not conservatism.
Kemi Badenoch has pledged to restore free childcare to high earners if she wins the next election.
The Conservative Party leader said the rules left parents thousands of pounds worse off when their earnings exceed £100,000, meaning that working harder does not always pay.
Under the “absurd” cliff edge rules, when one parent’s earnings increase by only £1 to over £100,000, a working couple could lose their entire entitlement of up to 30 hours a week of childcare support ⤵️
telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @UN_Women
In Great Britain, 93–95% of workers killed in work-related accidents are men. In the US, men have been about 91–93% of fatal work injuries.
You sure you want equality?
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @ITVWales
Biblical marriage is between one man and one woman – and it is the only place for sexual intercourse. Everything outside of that arrangement is sinful according to the Bible. You don’t have to believe the Bible, but could you please refrain from trying to change it to fit your unbiblical desires.
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Some overly weak, timid and even unconverted men end up on Church boards. Resisting their ungodly leadership can be obligation, not sin. I think that’s @howertonjosh ’s case, though @alisa_childers (who I now follow!) was making a great point about how this can go too far. @megbasham should write it up!
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Great recap by @RuthInstitute and @DrJrobackmorse. An honest assessment of what we know about the born this way theory of sexual orientation.
Spoiler: not even the @APA says people are #BornGay
youtu.be/8fTMUkSLye8?si=Xhr8…
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
This is really shocking, excellent work. Encourage all of my evangelical followers to read. The Gospel Coalition was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars from an anti-AI NGO.
And lo and behold, after this, TGC issued their anti-AI policy (which fine to have a policy, but it was done with a very particular subtext) then one of their best known personalities (@gavinortlund) issues an over the top warning about the dangers of AI and it’s potential for destroying humanity.
Shepherds for sale?
BREAKING: AI Safety Donors Paid Religious NGOs 3.3M for Statements on AI
The Future of Life Institute mobilized religious connections to support Anthropic and sway the Trump admin
Research and Design by @lumpenspace 🧵
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @BBCNews
What should be outlawed is the creation of a child with the intention of depriving it of one of its biological parents.
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Without a strong culture of marriage, the state doesn’t withdraw from family life, it moves in to own it.
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Fewer than half of the adults in England and Wales are now in a man-woman marriage, says Dr Tony Rucinski
premierchristianity.com/opin… @VisionTony
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
New figures suggest fewer than half of adults in England and Wales are now in an opposite-sex marriage. The Church must be bolder in defending and celebrating marriage, says Dr Tony Rucinski
premierchristianity.com/opin… @VisionTony
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
“The state cannot force young people to start a family, but it can create a stable and supportive environment in which families feel secure enough to realise their aspirations,” Dr Georgina Kiss-Kozma says. That is the test she leaves for any government.
c4m.org.uk/blog/what-hungary…
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Britain is giving up on marriage. The Church cannot
premierchristianity.com/opin… @VisionTony
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @CalumAM
This is why so-called gay “marriage” is a bit of a misnomer. They cannot in principle have kids, so why would you include them in a scheme to promote that?
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @LoisMcLatch
Unsurprising from Mrs “Back to basics” herself😕
You two are probably too young to remember her scandal with John Major…
Adultery ought to be a bar to public office office. Today it feels more like a rite of passage.
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Respond to the Government's incoherent cohabitation consultation by emailing [email protected] before Friday. My response and comprehensive dismantling of their proposals is available here: c4m.org.uk/storage/media/58/…
Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @StandingforXX
This is all ridiculous. The term “female” denotes anatomy that produces large gametes – and “male”, small gametes. So “woman” means adult human female etc etc.
Therefore, by definition, you cannot be born in the wrong body.
Everything else is preference, proclivity and mental health.















