Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap) header
Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap) profile picture

B.S/PhD in Biology Former analyst at biotech-specialist HF Citizen of Graham and Doddsville VIC member Not investment advice, my opinions only

Joined April 2024
Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)Photo by Vulpes Bio (@Vulpescap)
Replying to @trentkelp
The $NVS result is either a big positive or a big negative.
1
1
119
Replying to @Sanctuary_Bio
Come to Boston if you want to change that real quick
1
247
Replying to @Sanctuary_Bio
Isn’t Alberta the only place on earth with rats? Tradeoffs…
1
395
Replying to @trentkelp
I am. It’s spicy one
1
2
101
$GUTS Filing a PR to announce the results of some surveys you asked consultants to run for you after your stock fell 90% is one of the most depressing and pitiful moves I’ve ever seen in biotech @Harithr
2
1
15
1,495
Replying to @Biohazard3737
I was in the room. My thoughts exactly!
1
630
Anyone else at ESMO finding that the entirety of Madrid reeks of cigarettes?
1
8
1,094
Replying to @puppyeh1
Feels like $STOK at $6 when they got crushed after the biogen ex-US deal and data were years away (but funded). No way this doesn’t run up into Ph3 readout from the current price IMO
1
1
729
Replying to @Biohazard3737
What do mean exactly? Like validated MOA but questionable market opp? Awesome market opp but questionable MOA? Asking because you juxtaposed these against "quality" names
1
569
Replying to @lcbnuoH
Viagra
1
467
Replying to @A_May_MD
I do agree that if this gets approved it is going to fly off the shelves faster than cold beer on a hot day
1
11
2,341
Replying to @EgorBezel
In theory yes but what is going on here is A=B and B=C
1
176
That’s not what these graphs show
177
Control, not pbo *
319
Btw low dose and high dose both statistically indistinguishable from placebo. Numerically, low dose did worse than placebo. To compare to low dose now that pbo compare didn’t work, when low dose did worse than pbo numerically, is a new flavor of post hoc I’ve never seen
1
2
238
Replying to @EgorBezel
High dose results: p = 0.144 vs external control
2
3
542
I think you are taking something very very complicated and simplifying it into a sound bite that fits what you want to believe. If only the world were so simple…
1
146
$QURE Occam’s razor said it probably didn’t work. I usually trust Occam’s razor.
2
16
3,647
Okay if I concede this point to (notwithstanding the fact that 30-50% don’t believe in evolution) I still didn’t hear a response to the other massive structural advantages we’ve had that are not “the American worker”
1
164
This is 4th grade level thinking. We inherited a giant mass of virgin land with 2 coasts, brought a huge workforce that worked for free for free, had massive immigration supporting economic growth our entire history. The average American today who is fat lazy and stupid
1
1
225