
Indie series nerd with a passion for severe and tropical wx #PorVida politics are full of idiots lol learn wx!! Lead Forecaster @TheVOConX 6teen 🔥
nam3km
Joined June 2023
- Tweets11K
- Following1.4K
- Followers447
- Likes19.9K
Charlie retweeted
Quite the trend on the NAM (along with some of the other models), depicting a faster and stronger trough on Monday.
This has resulted in a trend towards the Sfc. Low, and moisture being pulled further north. Low-level dynamics are still strong over the main risk area (Central OK/KS), but a setup like this, should it verify, will support more a linear or sloppy mode (mainly dependent on instability) of storms along, or just ahead of the cold front.
Damaging winds and tornadoes remain the primary hazards for Monday afternoon-evening, despite these trends.
I’m starting to feel *much* better after the flu and have begun finishing the companion piece to the Hurricane #Melissa landfall reanalysis. It will further demonstrate why that intensity estimate was the only figure the objective data would support. I certainly didn’t set out expecting those numbers; they were simply where the in-situ observations led.
I’m still catching up on other work, so the full post will likely be out sometime next week.
Have a great rest of the weekend,
Tony
My reanalysis of Hurricane Melissa’s landfall in Jamaica places the best single intensity estimate at 150 kt/912 mb by the time the center crossed the coast near New Hope (1725Z), rather than the official 160 kt/897 mb. That is still an extraordinarily powerful high-end Category 5 #hurricane with a small, intense core.
This distinction is easy to lose sight of when assessing the highest winds that actually struck land. Because #Melissa was already weakening substantially on final approach, the most extreme portion of the radius of maximum winds (RMW) moved onshore near the iCyclone chase location in Crawford around 1605Z, while the storm still contained maximum sustained winds of 155 kt. Naturally, the immediate beaches there experienced the highest sustained 1-minute wind speeds of the entire landfall sequence. By the time the center actually came ashore about 1.3 hours later, further filling and structural degradation had reduced the intensity, consistent with the New Hope and Crawford eye pressure readings, the pressure trend from the final recon passes, and the progressive satellite changes.
Preferring an official record-tier landfall figure when the available evidence shows clear weakening after the last aircraft passes does *not* change the objective record, and it should not distract from what actually happened. Melissa still delivered catastrophic wind, surge, and flooding impacts to western Jamaica. The intensity revision is simply and solely about scientific and historical accuracy; it most certainly doesn’t lessen the devastation or the misery inflicted on the people who lived through it. The storm was extreme either way, and the strongest winds on land occurred earlier in the process than the center-crossing time suggests.
P.S., for those who might be wondering, my best estimate of the absolute highest 3-second wind gust Josh likely experienced is no less than 210 mph!
Charlie retweeted
GFS and AIGFS are both showing some development in the Caribbean in about 8-9 days as a frontal boundary stalls and helps to create some spin and convergence in the region. AIGFS has a very favorable upper pattern, which would be a bit of a surprise in November of a strong El Niño year. The AIFS (which doesn't show development) looks a little more realistic and less favorable.
I will say there's a surprising number of ECMWF ensemble members that show something forming down there. It doesn't usually have the same Caribbean bias as the GFS/GEFS. We'll see what happens.
I think at this point I'd lean towards the Niño climatology winning out and no development (or maybe something subtropical in the SW Atlantic), but we'll see.
Charlie retweeted
The Northern Hemisphere TC season is starting to quiet down a bit as we head towards November, but we still have a few things to watch. One area to keep an eye on is the Central Pacific South of Hawaii. This has been a crazy busy CPAC year, and we might have another candidate for development there soon as a favorable MJO and Equatorial Rossby Wave align across the region.
In all honesty this has beebnpushing C5 intensity or very close to it, even if JTWCs subjective analysis is only "FT 6.0"
I’m currently finishing up a follow-up/companion piece that meticulously reviews and reanalyzes all the available data from the immediate post-landfall period (1725Z–2300Z), further confirming that Hurricane #Melissa made landfall in #Jamaica well below the official intensity estimate of 160 kt/897 mb.
That said, it is important to remember that this significant decrease in strength from its historic peak made little practical difference in the devastating impact it delivered to western parts of the island. The reduction is far more relevant to scientific accuracy and to ensuring the historical record is as accurate as possible.
Currently and incorrectly, Melissa is tied with the Great Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 and Dorian (2019) for the strongest western hemisphere #hurricane landfall on record. In the same wholly objective reanalysis series, Dorian’s intensity is also overestimated while 1935 is clearly underestimated.
Consequently, based on all the objective data, the 1935 Great Labor Day Hurricane is the strongest and most intense hurricane landfall in the western hemisphere during at least the past 200 years.
Hurricane Melissa’s Jamaica Landfall: The Official Estimate Versus the Data
The official landfall intensity remains 160 kt/897 mb, which constitutes an official tie for the strongest #hurricane on record in the entire Western Hemisphere. That figure, however, is simply not supported by the available evidence. In the following in-depth reanalysis, we reexamine the reconnaissance data, structural evolution, satellite trends, and surface observations to determine the absolute best single intensity estimate at the time of Melissa’s catastrophic strike on western Jamaica.
What the official (NHC) Tropical Cyclone Report requires to retain 160 kt/897 mb
To hold the official landfall intensity of 160 kt/897 mb, the TCR effectively has to:
* Carry the peak intensity profile and an exaggerated inner-eyewall pressure gradient from the final reconnaissance pass all the way to the time of landfall.
* Discount the significant satellite degradation — eye filling and progressive cloud-top warming — that became increasingly pronounced after 1500Z.
* Set aside a straightforward extrapolation of the 2 mb pressure rise already measured between the last two center fixes (892 mb adjusted at 1302Z to 894 mb adjusted at 1346Z) over just 44 minutes, which by itself reaches approximately 904 mb by 1725Z.
* Treat the New Hope (913.5 mb at 1700Z, 3.5–4 n mi from the center) and Crawford (926.0 mb at 1720Z, 4.6 n mi from the center) readings as if they were not actually taken inside the eye, despite the documented conditions at both locations.
Producing 897 mb from those surface readings requires radial pressure rises of 16.5 mb over only 3.5–4 n mi to New Hope and 29 mb over just 4.6 n mi to Crawford — gradients of 4–6+ mb per n mi inside the eye. That degree of steepness is strictly eyewall territory. Inside the eye, warm subsident air and very low tangential winds produce a near-flat pressure field. Dropsonde observations routinely show minimal inner-core gradients and approximate gradient-wind balance above the boundary layer (García-Franco et al., 2021). Recent dropsonde analyses show that inner-eye radial gradients are typically very small — on the order of 1–2 mb or less over several nautical miles.
A Reconstruction Based on Observed Data
The final reconnaissance pass (ending 1346Z) established a near-flat pressure field inside an 8 n mi RMW and a central pressure of 894 mb (adjusted). The pressure had already risen 2 mb in the preceding 44 minutes (from 892 mb adjusted at 1302Z).
The TCR’s description of a 35–40 mb drop from center to the RMW over 5–8 n mi on that pass mixes two different radii: the actual wind maximum was near 8 n mi (VDM max wind 172 kt at 1351Z, dropsondes, and outbound HDOB), while the 5 n mi end of the range comes from a single inbound HDOB at 1344:30Z (extrapolated SLP of 927.7 mb at 5.4 n mi, inside the wind maximum). The dropsondes on the same pass confirm the surface wall near 8 n mi (927 mb south, 932 mb northwest). The official range therefore exaggerates the inner-eyewall gradient by treating an extrapolated pressure radius as if it were the RMW.
A peaked eyewall gradient of the magnitude actually observed demands a relatively flat inner eye — not the 16.5–29 mb rises over 3.5–5 n mi required to reach 897 mb from the New Hope and Crawford readings. Even in the record-intense Hurricane Patricia (872 mb peak), high-density dropsonde data showed inner-eye differentials of < 2 mb across comparable distances, despite eyewall gradients reaching 24 mb per n mi. Melissa’s required inner-eye variation far exceeds that precedent. As the cyclone neared landfall moving at a slow translation speed of 7 knots, Jamaica’s elevated terrain supplied an additional physical mechanism for accelerated disruption of low-level inflow that is typical in a high-end, small-core hurricane (Rogers et al., 2017).
The only direct measurements of the core in the final hour perfectly track this topographically induced filling trend. At 1700Z, New Hope Primary School recorded a surface pressure of 913.5 mb at a radar-derived distance of 3.5–4 n mi from the center. Twenty minutes later at 1720Z, the Crawford (iCyclone) sensor — positioned 4.6 n mi from the center, just inside the inner edge of the eye — registered a pressure of 926.0 mb amidst documented light-to-moderate rain and winds well below hurricane force. These ground-truth readings are mutually consistent with a rapidly degrading system and are wholly incompatible with a central pressure remotely close to the official 897 mb under the near-flat inner-eye structure documented by reconnaissance.
Maintaining a standard, near-flat inner-eye pressure field relative to the New Hope data yields a most likely central pressure of 912 mb at landfall. This satisfies a realistic 1–2 mb gradient across the eye floor and places Crawford right at the naturally steepening inner boundary of the eyewall. While standard wind-pressure relationships (WPR) might suggest lower wind speeds for a 912 mb storm moving at a slow 7 knots, Melissa’s extreme core contraction — with an RMW of only 8 n mi — allowed it to maintain an exceptionally high pressure gradient parameter even as the storm filled, enabling it to sustain 150 knot Category 5 winds right up to the coast.
However, a central pressure as low as 910 mb can’t be entirely ruled out as an absolute floor of physical plausibility. As the southern and eastern eyewall scraped the rugged terrain, severe boundary-layer friction likely induced localized, asymmetric compression of the internal gradient on the peripheral edge of the eye where Crawford was situated. This land-induced asymmetry can account for a steeper localized gradient to bridge a 910 mb center to Crawford, without requiring a pristine, ultra-intense 897 mb core configuration. Therefore, while 910 mb represents the baseline's floor, a value of 912 mb/150 kt stands as the most consistent, elegant, and mathematically supported estimate for Melissa’s landfall.
Hourly Satellite Analysis (BD-Curve Infrared Imagery)
(See the close-up four-panel IR sequence attached to the quoted post for the progression through landfall.)
1200Z (Near Peak)
The eye is clear and small, with a very well-defined round circular shape. Immediately surrounding the clear center is a tight, symmetrical sequence of very narrow color strips (blue, yellow, light red/dark orange, and black). These mark the steep temperature gradient at the edge of the eye and the innermost portion of the eyewall. Beyond the black strip lies the broader Central Dense Overcast (CDO), which is dominated by white and a light gray shading with intermixed pink areas. The pink marks the coldest cloud tops contained within the CDO.
The overall structure is tight and continuous, with no noticeable intrusion of the warmer colors into the eyewall region or CDO. In short, this is the classic appearance of a high-end Category 5 at or near maximum intensity.
1300Z
The eye remains clear, small, and well-defined. The innermost color strips (blue, yellow, light red/dark orange, and black) are still tight and symmetrical. The primary change from 1200Z is modest warming within the surrounding CDO: the white shading immediately outside the black eyewall strip has expanded into more light gray. Pink areas are still present, but slightly less continuous in the innermost CDO. This is a subtle early indication of the beginning of structural decline, consistent with the 2 mb pressure rise measured between the final reconnaissance fixes.
The overall presentation, however, remains that of a high-end Category 5.
1400Z
The eye remains clear and well-defined. The innermost color strips are still present and remain relatively tight. Further warming is now visible in the CDO immediately outside the eyewall. Darker gray tones have developed closest to the black strip, and the light gray has expanded outward. This is the first noticeable encroachment of warmer colors toward the eyewall region.
These changes are consistent with the aforementioned weakening observed between the final reconnaissance fixes (1302–1346Z) and marks the beginning of more evident structural decline from the peak presentation.
1500Z
The eye remains well-shaped, but has continued to become less sharply defined than at peak. The innermost color strips have begun to lose definition: the red ring has expanded and overtaken portions of the black band, and warmer tones are appearing closer to the eye. In the surrounding CDO, warming has also continued. Darker gray tones have expanded around the eyewall region, with intermixed black splotches. The light gray has become even more extensive.
This represents a clear continuation of the structural decline that began after 1300Z, featuring the first evident degradation of the eyewall color strips themselves.
1600Z
The eye remains relatively well-shaped, but has lost further definition. The innermost color strips outside the blue and yellow have warmed substantially: black has overtaken much of the previous red, red has moved into the former black band, and black has replaced darker gray farther outward in the CDO. Warming of the surrounding CDO has continued, with darker gray and black tones more extensive around the eyewall region.
This interval coincided with the outer edge of the eyewall first reaching the western Jamaican coast around 1515Z. The topographically driven structural decline is now well established.
1700Z (Final Approach)
As the eye makes its final approach and the RMW in the northeastern eyewall moves onshore over southwestern Jamaica, the satellite presentation shows far more dramatic deterioration. The eye has lost significant definition and shape; it is smaller and more cloud-filled. Warming has continued throughout the CDO and is most pronounced in the eyewall region. Each of the color strips immediately around the eye has warmed, with the colors bleeding into one another. None retains a solid, well-defined strip. The red band that was once tight and continuous is now significantly distorted.
This marks a clear acceleration of the structural decline as the core heavily interacts with the coastline.
1725Z (Landfall)
During the final 25–30 minutes prior to landfall, the weakening further accelerated. The eye has contracted further and is increasingly cloud-filled. Its once well-defined and symmetrically circular shape is now noticeably distorted. The same pattern of progressive warming has continued: the innermost color strips have lost additional definition, and warmer tones have expanded further into the eyewall and innermost CDO.
The presentation at landfall is substantially degraded from the peak structure at 1200Z and is completely consistent with the continued core filling indicated by both the New Hope and Crawford eye surface readings.
Hourly intensity estimates
Based on the reconnaissance pressures, the measured filling rate, the progressive satellite degradation, and the eye surface readings:
* 1200Z: 165 kt/891 mb
* 1300Z: 165 kt/892 mb
* 1400Z: 165 kt/895 mb
* 1500Z: 160 kt/898 mb
* 1600Z: 155 kt/902 mb
* 1700Z: 150 kt/907 mb
* 1725Z (landfall): 150 kt/912 mb (plausible localized range down to 910 mb)
As seen, there is simply no possible basis for the official landfall intensity of 160 kt/897 mb. Every independent piece of evidence available after the final reconnaissance passes indicates progressive, significant weakening. The data that exist leave no other conclusion: #Melissa underwent pronounced inner-core weakening and made landfall well below its historic peak.
Charlie retweeted
What really stands out to me here is how shear never got at all favorable, even at peak. 1997 and 2015 both dipped down to near average briefly in September, but this year basically had June-level shear or more for the entire season. Just a complete wipeout over the MDR.
Several factors made this Atlantic hurricane season one of the least active on record but one in particular stands out. Wind shear wasn't just high, it was record-shattering high. Today's newsletter is packed with all the details ⬇️
michaelrlowry.substack.com/p…
Charlie retweeted
I have a sneaking suspicion that the extreme eastward shift & intensity of this yr’s “Super” El Niño has something to do w/ the unprecedented, exceptionally early Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event that’s in most model forecasts
Plots via @Recretos’s site
severe-weather.eu/polar-vort…
Hurricane Melissa’s Jamaica Landfall: The Official Estimate Versus the Data
The official landfall intensity remains 160 kt/897 mb, which constitutes an official tie for the strongest #hurricane on record in the entire Western Hemisphere. That figure, however, is simply not supported by the available evidence. In the following in-depth reanalysis, we reexamine the reconnaissance data, structural evolution, satellite trends, and surface observations to determine the absolute best single intensity estimate at the time of Melissa’s catastrophic strike on western Jamaica.
What the official (NHC) Tropical Cyclone Report requires to retain 160 kt/897 mb
To hold the official landfall intensity of 160 kt/897 mb, the TCR effectively has to:
* Carry the peak intensity profile and an exaggerated inner-eyewall pressure gradient from the final reconnaissance pass all the way to the time of landfall.
* Discount the significant satellite degradation — eye filling and progressive cloud-top warming — that became increasingly pronounced after 1500Z.
* Set aside a straightforward extrapolation of the 2 mb pressure rise already measured between the last two center fixes (892 mb adjusted at 1302Z to 894 mb adjusted at 1346Z) over just 44 minutes, which by itself reaches approximately 904 mb by 1725Z.
* Treat the New Hope (913.5 mb at 1700Z, 3.5–4 n mi from the center) and Crawford (926.0 mb at 1720Z, 4.6 n mi from the center) readings as if they were not actually taken inside the eye, despite the documented conditions at both locations.
Producing 897 mb from those surface readings requires radial pressure rises of 16.5 mb over only 3.5–4 n mi to New Hope and 29 mb over just 4.6 n mi to Crawford — gradients of 4–6+ mb per n mi inside the eye. That degree of steepness is strictly eyewall territory. Inside the eye, warm subsident air and very low tangential winds produce a near-flat pressure field. Dropsonde observations routinely show minimal inner-core gradients and approximate gradient-wind balance above the boundary layer (García-Franco et al., 2021). Recent dropsonde analyses show that inner-eye radial gradients are typically very small — on the order of 1–2 mb or less over several nautical miles.
A Reconstruction Based on Observed Data
The final reconnaissance pass (ending 1346Z) established a near-flat pressure field inside an 8 n mi RMW and a central pressure of 894 mb (adjusted). The pressure had already risen 2 mb in the preceding 44 minutes (from 892 mb adjusted at 1302Z).
The TCR’s description of a 35–40 mb drop from center to the RMW over 5–8 n mi on that pass mixes two different radii: the actual wind maximum was near 8 n mi (VDM max wind 172 kt at 1351Z, dropsondes, and outbound HDOB), while the 5 n mi end of the range comes from a single inbound HDOB at 1344:30Z (extrapolated SLP of 927.7 mb at 5.4 n mi, inside the wind maximum). The dropsondes on the same pass confirm the surface wall near 8 n mi (927 mb south, 932 mb northwest). The official range therefore exaggerates the inner-eyewall gradient by treating an extrapolated pressure radius as if it were the RMW.
A peaked eyewall gradient of the magnitude actually observed demands a relatively flat inner eye — not the 16.5–29 mb rises over 3.5–5 n mi required to reach 897 mb from the New Hope and Crawford readings. Even in the record-intense Hurricane Patricia (872 mb peak), high-density dropsonde data showed inner-eye differentials of < 2 mb across comparable distances, despite eyewall gradients reaching 24 mb per n mi. Melissa’s required inner-eye variation far exceeds that precedent. As the cyclone neared landfall moving at a slow translation speed of 7 knots, Jamaica’s elevated terrain supplied an additional physical mechanism for accelerated disruption of low-level inflow that is typical in a high-end, small-core hurricane (Rogers et al., 2017).
The only direct measurements of the core in the final hour perfectly track this topographically induced filling trend. At 1700Z, New Hope Primary School recorded a surface pressure of 913.5 mb at a radar-derived distance of 3.5–4 n mi from the center. Twenty minutes later at 1720Z, the Crawford (iCyclone) sensor — positioned 4.6 n mi from the center, just inside the inner edge of the eye — registered a pressure of 926.0 mb amidst documented light-to-moderate rain and winds well below hurricane force. These ground-truth readings are mutually consistent with a rapidly degrading system and are wholly incompatible with a central pressure remotely close to the official 897 mb under the near-flat inner-eye structure documented by reconnaissance.
Maintaining a standard, near-flat inner-eye pressure field relative to the New Hope data yields a most likely central pressure of 912 mb at landfall. This satisfies a realistic 1–2 mb gradient across the eye floor and places Crawford right at the naturally steepening inner boundary of the eyewall. While standard wind-pressure relationships (WPR) might suggest lower wind speeds for a 912 mb storm moving at a slow 7 knots, Melissa’s extreme core contraction — with an RMW of only 8 n mi — allowed it to maintain an exceptionally high pressure gradient parameter even as the storm filled, enabling it to sustain 150 knot Category 5 winds right up to the coast.
However, a central pressure as low as 910 mb can’t be entirely ruled out as an absolute floor of physical plausibility. As the southern and eastern eyewall scraped the rugged terrain, severe boundary-layer friction likely induced localized, asymmetric compression of the internal gradient on the peripheral edge of the eye where Crawford was situated. This land-induced asymmetry can account for a steeper localized gradient to bridge a 910 mb center to Crawford, without requiring a pristine, ultra-intense 897 mb core configuration. Therefore, while 910 mb represents the baseline's floor, a value of 912 mb/150 kt stands as the most consistent, elegant, and mathematically supported estimate for Melissa’s landfall.
Hourly Satellite Analysis (BD-Curve Infrared Imagery)
(See the close-up four-panel IR sequence attached to the quoted post for the progression through landfall.)
1200Z (Near Peak)
The eye is clear and small, with a very well-defined round circular shape. Immediately surrounding the clear center is a tight, symmetrical sequence of very narrow color strips (blue, yellow, light red/dark orange, and black). These mark the steep temperature gradient at the edge of the eye and the innermost portion of the eyewall. Beyond the black strip lies the broader Central Dense Overcast (CDO), which is dominated by white and a light gray shading with intermixed pink areas. The pink marks the coldest cloud tops contained within the CDO.
The overall structure is tight and continuous, with no noticeable intrusion of the warmer colors into the eyewall region or CDO. In short, this is the classic appearance of a high-end Category 5 at or near maximum intensity.
1300Z
The eye remains clear, small, and well-defined. The innermost color strips (blue, yellow, light red/dark orange, and black) are still tight and symmetrical. The primary change from 1200Z is modest warming within the surrounding CDO: the white shading immediately outside the black eyewall strip has expanded into more light gray. Pink areas are still present, but slightly less continuous in the innermost CDO. This is a subtle early indication of the beginning of structural decline, consistent with the 2 mb pressure rise measured between the final reconnaissance fixes.
The overall presentation, however, remains that of a high-end Category 5.
1400Z
The eye remains clear and well-defined. The innermost color strips are still present and remain relatively tight. Further warming is now visible in the CDO immediately outside the eyewall. Darker gray tones have developed closest to the black strip, and the light gray has expanded outward. This is the first noticeable encroachment of warmer colors toward the eyewall region.
These changes are consistent with the aforementioned weakening observed between the final reconnaissance fixes (1302–1346Z) and marks the beginning of more evident structural decline from the peak presentation.
1500Z
The eye remains well-shaped, but has continued to become less sharply defined than at peak. The innermost color strips have begun to lose definition: the red ring has expanded and overtaken portions of the black band, and warmer tones are appearing closer to the eye. In the surrounding CDO, warming has also continued. Darker gray tones have expanded around the eyewall region, with intermixed black splotches. The light gray has become even more extensive.
This represents a clear continuation of the structural decline that began after 1300Z, featuring the first evident degradation of the eyewall color strips themselves.
1600Z
The eye remains relatively well-shaped, but has lost further definition. The innermost color strips outside the blue and yellow have warmed substantially: black has overtaken much of the previous red, red has moved into the former black band, and black has replaced darker gray farther outward in the CDO. Warming of the surrounding CDO has continued, with darker gray and black tones more extensive around the eyewall region.
This interval coincided with the outer edge of the eyewall first reaching the western Jamaican coast around 1515Z. The topographically driven structural decline is now well established.
1700Z (Final Approach)
As the eye makes its final approach and the RMW in the northeastern eyewall moves onshore over southwestern Jamaica, the satellite presentation shows far more dramatic deterioration. The eye has lost significant definition and shape; it is smaller and more cloud-filled. Warming has continued throughout the CDO and is most pronounced in the eyewall region. Each of the color strips immediately around the eye has warmed, with the colors bleeding into one another. None retains a solid, well-defined strip. The red band that was once tight and continuous is now significantly distorted.
This marks a clear acceleration of the structural decline as the core heavily interacts with the coastline.
1725Z (Landfall)
During the final 25–30 minutes prior to landfall, the weakening further accelerated. The eye has contracted further and is increasingly cloud-filled. Its once well-defined and symmetrically circular shape is now noticeably distorted. The same pattern of progressive warming has continued: the innermost color strips have lost additional definition, and warmer tones have expanded further into the eyewall and innermost CDO.
The presentation at landfall is substantially degraded from the peak structure at 1200Z and is completely consistent with the continued core filling indicated by both the New Hope and Crawford eye surface readings.
Hourly intensity estimates
Based on the reconnaissance pressures, the measured filling rate, the progressive satellite degradation, and the eye surface readings:
* 1200Z: 165 kt/891 mb
* 1300Z: 165 kt/892 mb
* 1400Z: 165 kt/895 mb
* 1500Z: 160 kt/898 mb
* 1600Z: 155 kt/902 mb
* 1700Z: 150 kt/907 mb
* 1725Z (landfall): 150 kt/912 mb (plausible localized range down to 910 mb)
As seen, there is simply no possible basis for the official landfall intensity of 160 kt/897 mb. Every independent piece of evidence available after the final reconnaissance passes indicates progressive, significant weakening. The data that exist leave no other conclusion: #Melissa underwent pronounced inner-core weakening and made landfall well below its historic peak.
On the one-year anniversary, social media will be flooded with claims that Hurricane #Melissa is justifiably tied for the strongest Western Hemisphere landfall on record (per the official estimates).
Although it is natural to have an inherent interest in hopes of retaining a record-level event, it is most important that one set aside any inherent biases to analyze the objective data completely devoid of emotion and rigorously follow where the evidence leads.
Consequently, a very detailed reanalysis of the landfall intensity is forthcoming. It examines the reconnaissance structure, the measured pressure trend, the eye surface readings, and the progressive satellite degradation after the final aircraft passes.
As you will see, the official 160 kt/897 mb estimate is not even remotely supported by those data. The full breakdown, including the *best* single intensity estimate, will be posted within the next couple of days.
For the record, I was a student intern at the NHC during the summer of 1988 prior to obtaining my own meteorological degree and subsequently working for NOAA/NWS. As such, I genuinely have the utmost respect for the work they do and know firsthand how truly demanding and stressful their job can be.
Just as the science has evolved dramatically during the subsequent decades, so has my own knowledge base. I have sacrificed countless hours continuing to expand that knowledge and that will continue to be the case for as long as I’m mentally able. Contrary to the misunderstanding of some, I don’t consider it a competition with the NHC or any other agency or persons. My foremost goal is to be the very best I can be in all I do and live my own life in a way that I hope can make a positive difference in the lives of others. That underlying principle and a deep desire in seeking truth and accuracy as much as it’s possible is what drives my own forecasting approach.
I am not questioning anyone’s integrity or motives. The forthcoming reanalysis of Melissa’s landfall intensity is based *solely* on the available objective data — the reconnaissance structure, the measured filling rate, the eye surface readings, and the unmistakable progressive satellite degradation. Those observations lead to a different conclusion than the official estimate. That is the only point at issue. I will never hesitate to offer a thorough, data-driven, and completely unbiased assessment when the evidence simply doesn’t support the official numbers. It is not personal. It is about following where the data lead.
On the one-year anniversary, social media will be flooded with claims that Hurricane #Melissa is justifiably tied for the strongest Western Hemisphere landfall on record (per the official estimates).
Although it is natural to have an inherent interest in hopes of retaining a record-level event, it is most important that one set aside any inherent biases to analyze the objective data completely devoid of emotion and rigorously follow where the evidence leads.
Consequently, a very detailed reanalysis of the landfall intensity is forthcoming. It examines the reconnaissance structure, the measured pressure trend, the eye surface readings, and the progressive satellite degradation after the final aircraft passes.
As you will see, the official 160 kt/897 mb estimate is not even remotely supported by those data. The full breakdown, including the *best* single intensity estimate, will be posted within the next couple of days.
Charlie retweeted
The satellite presentation of Arnab has become very impressive this evening but rapid intensification may be ending. Automated estimates are having a hard time and cap out at around 105 knots. This is too low. The intensity is likely much higher and could be as high as 120 knots.
Charlie retweeted
The satellite presentation of In-Fa has behaved erratically this afternoon/evening. This seemed to primarily be attributable to external factors (like upwelling), as there is no indication an ERC occurred already but MW images and M-PERC continue to suggest the possibility of one
Charlie retweeted
Since this post was made untimely, convection quickly rotated upshear & now In-Fa is on approach to major typhoon status. The system is enjoying a maximum of poleward divergence in a saddle point, where 10-15kts of outflow shear can be easily managed.
#In-Fa's current structure indicates the presence of moderate vertical shear, with repeated updrafts that initiate downshear struggling to rotate into the right of the shear vector. A nearby upper trough is driving moderate westerlies aloft.





















































