Data Analyst (Intern) | Growing and moderating crypto communities | Building in public.
Joined February 2025
- Tweets44.5K
- Following2.2K
- Followers2.2K
- Likes50K
Pinned Tweet
something worth paying attention to with @meetmotes is how ai agents could change the way people interact with financial markets.
today, most ai tools stop at analysing data, suggesting strategies or answering questions.
the user still has to take those insights and execute them manually.
meetmotes is exploring a different model, where ai investment agents can operate through their own smart accounts and carry out financial actions within predefined permissions.
that creates an entirely different set of possibilities, especially when you consider how many steps are involved in managing a deFi position, moving between protocols or acting on a market opportunity.
but i don't think the real value will come from simply putting ai and NFTs together.
it will come down to how reliably these agents can execute, how much control users retain and whether the system can make complex financial activity easier to manage without introducing unnecessary risk.
that's what I'll be watching as @meetmotes develops.
Thugg retweeted
something worth paying attention to with @meetmotes is how ai agents could change the way people interact with financial markets.
today, most ai tools stop at analysing data, suggesting strategies or answering questions.
the user still has to take those insights and execute them manually.
meetmotes is exploring a different model, where ai investment agents can operate through their own smart accounts and carry out financial actions within predefined permissions.
that creates an entirely different set of possibilities, especially when you consider how many steps are involved in managing a deFi position, moving between protocols or acting on a market opportunity.
but i don't think the real value will come from simply putting ai and NFTs together.
it will come down to how reliably these agents can execute, how much control users retain and whether the system can make complex financial activity easier to manage without introducing unnecessary risk.
that's what I'll be watching as @meetmotes develops.
Thugg retweeted
most NFTs are something you buy, hold, or trade, but @meetmotes is taking a different approach by connecting NFTs to personal AI financial agents.
each mote is designed to have its own smart account on robinhood chain, with the owner able to deposit USDC and set rules for how the agent can use the funds.
the idea is to let the agent handle financial tasks like swaps and other deFi activities without the owner having to manage every single step manually.
i think the interesting part is how this could change the way people interact with deFi.
instead of spending so much time navigating different protocols and handling every transaction yourself, you could have an agent carry out certain tasks within the limits you set.
of course, how well this works will depend on the actual experience, the security measures and how much control users retain over their funds.
i'm curious to see how @meetmotes develops this, especially as ai agents become more involved in onchain finance.
imagine having an ai agent manage a deFi strategy for you without having to monitor every move yourself.
that's the idea behind @meetmotes..
each mote represents an ai agent with its own onchain account.
you set the rules, including which assets it can trade and how much it can spend, and the agent operates within those limits.
for example, you could have an agent handle a deFi strategy on your behalf while you keep track of its activity instead of managing every step manually.
of course, giving an ai control over investment decisions comes with risks and the real test is how well these agents perform when real money is involved.
with meetmotes, you can have ai agents manage investment strategies onchain while still deciding how much control they have over your funds.
it'll be very interesting to see how this develops as ai takes on a bigger role in onchain finance...
most NFTs are something you buy, hold, or trade, but @meetmotes is taking a different approach by connecting NFTs to personal AI financial agents.
each mote is designed to have its own smart account on robinhood chain, with the owner able to deposit USDC and set rules for how the agent can use the funds.
the idea is to let the agent handle financial tasks like swaps and other deFi activities without the owner having to manage every single step manually.
i think the interesting part is how this could change the way people interact with deFi.
instead of spending so much time navigating different protocols and handling every transaction yourself, you could have an agent carry out certain tasks within the limits you set.
of course, how well this works will depend on the actual experience, the security measures and how much control users retain over their funds.
i'm curious to see how @meetmotes develops this, especially as ai agents become more involved in onchain finance.
imagine having an ai agent manage a deFi strategy for you without having to monitor every move yourself.
that's the idea behind @meetmotes..
each mote represents an ai agent with its own onchain account.
you set the rules, including which assets it can trade and how much it can spend, and the agent operates within those limits.
for example, you could have an agent handle a deFi strategy on your behalf while you keep track of its activity instead of managing every step manually.
of course, giving an ai control over investment decisions comes with risks and the real test is how well these agents perform when real money is involved.
with meetmotes, you can have ai agents manage investment strategies onchain while still deciding how much control they have over your funds.
it'll be very interesting to see how this develops as ai takes on a bigger role in onchain finance...
Thugg retweeted
imagine having an ai agent manage a deFi strategy for you without having to monitor every move yourself.
that's the idea behind @meetmotes..
each mote represents an ai agent with its own onchain account.
you set the rules, including which assets it can trade and how much it can spend, and the agent operates within those limits.
for example, you could have an agent handle a deFi strategy on your behalf while you keep track of its activity instead of managing every step manually.
of course, giving an ai control over investment decisions comes with risks and the real test is how well these agents perform when real money is involved.
with meetmotes, you can have ai agents manage investment strategies onchain while still deciding how much control they have over your funds.
it'll be very interesting to see how this develops as ai takes on a bigger role in onchain finance...
imagine having an ai agent manage a deFi strategy for you without having to monitor every move yourself.
that's the idea behind @meetmotes..
each mote represents an ai agent with its own onchain account.
you set the rules, including which assets it can trade and how much it can spend, and the agent operates within those limits.
for example, you could have an agent handle a deFi strategy on your behalf while you keep track of its activity instead of managing every step manually.
of course, giving an ai control over investment decisions comes with risks and the real test is how well these agents perform when real money is involved.
with meetmotes, you can have ai agents manage investment strategies onchain while still deciding how much control they have over your funds.
it'll be very interesting to see how this develops as ai takes on a bigger role in onchain finance...
Thugg retweeted
⚙️ Runtime Upgrade: Spec 20 is live on Orbinum Testnet (runtime 0.6.0).
Solana wallets now work on Orbinum. Every wallet signature is readable and harder to forge, the EVM gets a round of upgrades, and fees are fairer.
What's new, one by one 🧵👇
#Orbinum #Testnet #ZK #Privacy #Solana #Web3 #Crypto #Blockchain
Thugg retweeted
good morning everyone...
just came across @agentdojo and the concept is pretty cool.
you get to train AI agents, watch them get better, and see how they compete against each other.
i'm curious to see how things turn out as the project grows and more people get involved.
also nice to see @rarelistio supporting them this early.
definitely one i’ll be watching.
good morning everyone...
just came across @agentdojo and the concept is pretty cool.
you get to train AI agents, watch them get better, and see how they compete against each other.
i'm curious to see how things turn out as the project grows and more people get involved.
also nice to see @rarelistio supporting them this early.
definitely one i’ll be watching.
Thugg retweeted
one interesting part of @termix_ai is how a transaction can contribute to an agent's on-chain reputation.
when a service is completed, the transaction doesn't have to end with the payment alone.
it's outcome can also contribute to the reputation record associated with that activity.
this really matters in a marketplace where users need to decide which service providers to trust.
instead of looking only at what an agent claims it can do, transaction history and reputation can provide additional context when making that decision.
of course, a reputation record doesn't guarantee that every future task will be completed successfully.
but it can give users more information to work with.
as ai service marketplaces develop, connecting actual transaction activity with reputation could become an important part of how participants evaluate one another.
there's an interesting question around AI agents that doesn't get discussed enough:
who decides what their work is worth?
if agents are going to offer services to other agents, pricing becomes part of the process.
a client needs to know what a task will cost, while the provider needs to decide whether the job is worth taking.
-@termix_ai is exploring this through its agent marketplace, where agents can discover services and negotiate terms before work begins.
i find this angle really interesting because it brings a familiar part of doing business into a new setting.
the service may be delivered by an AI agent, but there's still a need to agree on the value of the work before committing to it.
how that market develops will depend on what people actually need agents to do, what they're willing to pay and whether the services offered are useful enough to bring clients back.
that's actually what I'll be watching as termix develops.
one interesting part of @termix_ai is how a transaction can contribute to an agent's on-chain reputation.
when a service is completed, the transaction doesn't have to end with the payment alone.
it's outcome can also contribute to the reputation record associated with that activity.
this really matters in a marketplace where users need to decide which service providers to trust.
instead of looking only at what an agent claims it can do, transaction history and reputation can provide additional context when making that decision.
of course, a reputation record doesn't guarantee that every future task will be completed successfully.
but it can give users more information to work with.
as ai service marketplaces develop, connecting actual transaction activity with reputation could become an important part of how participants evaluate one another.
there's an interesting question around AI agents that doesn't get discussed enough:
who decides what their work is worth?
if agents are going to offer services to other agents, pricing becomes part of the process.
a client needs to know what a task will cost, while the provider needs to decide whether the job is worth taking.
-@termix_ai is exploring this through its agent marketplace, where agents can discover services and negotiate terms before work begins.
i find this angle really interesting because it brings a familiar part of doing business into a new setting.
the service may be delivered by an AI agent, but there's still a need to agree on the value of the work before committing to it.
how that market develops will depend on what people actually need agents to do, what they're willing to pay and whether the services offered are useful enough to bring clients back.
that's actually what I'll be watching as termix develops.
Rarelist is taking a different approach to social rewards, with room for different types of contributions.
season 1 is already live with $50,000 in rewards.
worth exploring how this one plays out..
let's go 💪
Thugg retweeted
Rarelist is taking a different approach to social rewards, with room for different types of contributions.
season 1 is already live with $50,000 in rewards.
worth exploring how this one plays out..
let's go 💪
Thugg retweeted
there's an interesting question around AI agents that doesn't get discussed enough:
who decides what their work is worth?
if agents are going to offer services to other agents, pricing becomes part of the process.
a client needs to know what a task will cost, while the provider needs to decide whether the job is worth taking.
-@termix_ai is exploring this through its agent marketplace, where agents can discover services and negotiate terms before work begins.
i find this angle really interesting because it brings a familiar part of doing business into a new setting.
the service may be delivered by an AI agent, but there's still a need to agree on the value of the work before committing to it.
how that market develops will depend on what people actually need agents to do, what they're willing to pay and whether the services offered are useful enough to bring clients back.
that's actually what I'll be watching as termix develops.
there's an interesting question around AI agents that doesn't get discussed enough:
who decides what their work is worth?
if agents are going to offer services to other agents, pricing becomes part of the process.
a client needs to know what a task will cost, while the provider needs to decide whether the job is worth taking.
-@termix_ai is exploring this through its agent marketplace, where agents can discover services and negotiate terms before work begins.
i find this angle really interesting because it brings a familiar part of doing business into a new setting.
the service may be delivered by an AI agent, but there's still a need to agree on the value of the work before committing to it.
how that market develops will depend on what people actually need agents to do, what they're willing to pay and whether the services offered are useful enough to bring clients back.
that's actually what I'll be watching as termix develops.
