Richard Weller retweeted
I’m a dermatologist. I’m supposed to say there is no amount of safe sun exposure.
But I won’t, because that’s a lie.
The attached shows how much sun is safe in different cities at different times of year.
What do I mean by ‘safe’?
I mean this: UV causes DNA damage and skin cancer.
But, shockingly, your body repairs that damage. As long as the damage doesn’t outpace repair and start accumulating it shouldn't increase your risk of skin cancer.
Data just came out that tells us how much UV you can get without damage accumulating.
They took the people most susceptible to DNA damage from UV and exposed them to UV, then did skin biopsies to measure the damage, then more skin biopsies to measure the repair, and repeated it daily for 4 days.
At 1.6 ‘Standard Erythemal Dose’ (SED) there was no accumulation of damage.
So, the attached charts show how much sun it takes to get 1 SED in different cities at different times of the year at different times of day.
And there are extra safety margins built in. It assumes a perfectly clear day with zero air pollution and that the sun is hitting your skin perpendicularly. Unless you’re laying flat, most sun is hitting you at an angle, which isn’t nearly as intense.
But a bigger question you might be asking is ‘Why would a dermatologist be telling you to get sun in the first place?’
Because getting sun reduces your risk of death.
Mostly by reducing your risk of heart attacks and strokes. That is very well proven.
But it’s also very likely that sun exposure reduces your risk of autoimmune disease, dementia, cancer and depression. It’s just not as well proven as the protection against heart attacks and strokes.
And before you reply and say ‘just take vitamin D!’, know that it has been ROBUSTLY proven that vitamin D has little (if any) benefit for preventing any of the above. Vitamin D is mostly useful as a marker of if you’re getting enough sun.
What do I do myself and what do I tell my patients?
Get as much unprotected sun exposure as you can without getting a burn.
That’s my GUESS as to what has the best risk/benefit ratio. Dying of skin cancer is actually really rare, especially when compared to the risk of heart attacks, strokes, autoimmune disease, dementia and other cancers.
But I’ll admit it’s not for sure best to get as much sun as possible, since sun does increase the risk of skin cancer and it might be the case the benefits plateau at a low level.
So, if you’re really worried about skin cancer stick to the charts.
The best science I can find says that amount won’t cause skin cancer.
The takeaway?
Sun is good for you, just don’t get a burn.
Dermatology is wrong about the sun.
And it's killing people.
I'm a dermatologist. 226 publications. I should know.
Avoiding the sun increases the risk of dying as much as being a smoker.
We can fix it.
For decades, dermatology's message has been simple: avoid the sun. Wear sunscreen. Seek shade. UV causes skin cancer. End of discussion.
That message is incomplete and outdated.
People are dying because of it. Lots of people.
The evidence has gotten strong enough that the field needs to update it.🧵
marieclaire.com/beauty/skinc… Good to see this discussion moving into the beauty sphere
3
138
Richard Weller retweeted
🚨🚨🚨BRAND NEW BOOK DEFENDING SUNLIGHT!! ☀️ I’m not even half way through the introduction and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) is brought up!!
Everyone needs to read this book and SHARE IT WITH A FRIEND!!
Amazing forward by Dr. Richard Weller (@WellerRichard) and incredible start so far.
Thank you @rowanjacobsen for writing this much needed book! Can’t wait to read the rest.
Richard Weller retweeted
So, I opened my email today and found out from the American Academy of Dermatology member email that USA Today ran AAD's Practice Safe Sun survey.
The same day I posted about how dermatology is killing people and had it go viral, closing in on a million views.
Talk about a lucky coincidence. Honestly. It's not like the AAD keeps me informed about their PR schedule.
The headline finding: 16 million Americans have reduced sunscreen use because of online "misinformation."
Based on timing, they obviously weren't talking about my post specifically, but given the "there is no such thing as a safe tan" quote in the article, I'll bet they'd call it misinformation, even though I'm not anti-sunscreen.
Man I hope @aadskin or @aadmember engages.
It'd make them engage with the peer-reviewed evidence base that sun avoidance increases mortality:
-MISS cohort, 29,500 Swedish women, 25 years. Lowest sun exposure had mortality comparable to smokers.
-UK Biobank, ~400,000 participants. Highest UV exposure had 19% lower cardiovascular mortality, 15% lower all-cause mortality.
-Korean NBUVB study, 12,000 vitiligo patients. 100+ clinic phototherapy sessions associated with 36% fewer cardiovascular events.
The AAD is worried "misinformation" is causing people to wear less sunscreen.
I'm worried the AAD is killing people.
Richard Weller retweeted
Thank you, @PublishersWkly for highlighting IN DEFENSE OF SUNLIGHT in your new "What We're Reading" picks. Book comes out in June, buzz is great, pre-order now to ensure you get a copy of the first printing.
publishersweekly.com/9781668…
Richard Weller retweeted
Dermatology is wrong about the sun.
And it's killing people.
I'm a dermatologist. 226 publications. I should know.
Avoiding the sun increases the risk of dying as much as being a smoker.
We can fix it.
For decades, dermatology's message has been simple: avoid the sun. Wear sunscreen. Seek shade. UV causes skin cancer. End of discussion.
That message is incomplete and outdated.
People are dying because of it. Lots of people.
The evidence has gotten strong enough that the field needs to update it.🧵
More Sun Exposure Is Associated With a Longer Life youtube.com/shorts/itDBS3zef… via @YouTube
Great to see this excellent documentary on my research broadcast swr.de/unternehmen/kommunika…
1
11
639
Richard Weller retweeted
🚨🚨🚨
I sat down with @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO and talked about EVERYTHING on the second most watched podcast in the world!
youtube.com/watch?v=wQJlGHVm…
Richard Weller retweeted
Dr. Richard Weller, UK dermatologist, and author of the recent article published advocating a rethink of sunlight here:
jidonline.org/article/S0022-…
also appeared on the People's Pharmacy talking about US dermatologists. It's a good listen:
peoplespharmacy.com/articles…
Richard Weller retweeted
Its wild that more than 3 years on, some dermatologists are still upset/concerned with our melanoma overdiagnosis paper. Its telling not a single cogent response has been mounted. Overdiagnosis is clearly happening, ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
Richard Weller retweeted
Our new study suggests that the benefits of higher UV exposure outweigh the risks in low light environments like the UK. We used geographic and behavioural UV estimates, validated by vitamin D serum levels and a negative control outcome to test this Q.
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Pleased to see this paper of ours now published lnkd.in/ehMNA54N and even better, an article in the The Economist describing our findings. lnkd.in/eKGePiFw
Broadly we studied participants in the UK Biobank with two independent measures of sunlight exposure-
Richard Weller retweeted
Interesting research by @WellerRichard and others using UK Biobank. UV exposure associated with LOWER all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Manuscript here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3909…
Basking in the sun has been considered a health hazard for at least four decades. The risks ultraviolet light poses are real, but new research suggests it may be time to consider the benefits econ.st/4fINwaZ 👇
Richard Weller retweeted
Replying to @AdeAdamson @WellerRichard
Great post. @WellerRichard also just published a great review that explores the topic in detail
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3866…
























