@Wilfthesecond
Joined July 2020
  • Tweets2.7K
  • Following10
  • Followers22
103Media
What you mean is believing the claims of people on social media
No more injustice@LorobawaOct 17
Replying to @Wilfthesecond @Marymungom87371 @TheCountessNHS
I wouldn’t be happy with his care knowing what we know now. I can’t imagine the family is either.
1
132
And the award for the most deranged Letbyist goes to... They really will do anything to defend the baby killer.
FRANKANDROSEY@FRANKANDROSEYOct 12
We now have ample evidence that the collapses of A, B and C were staged I believe this was to cover the damage done by clandestine intubations. We can but guess what was done to babies before Baby A and if Lucy had been called on to insert a guedel in any of them @PeterElston1
2
1
7
215
This didn't mean you had to delete your call log. Just that after 20 entries they would be replaced. Are you pretending it was standard to delete all logs for no reason? And that Luke happened to do this just.... because?
Mikey Taylor@MikeyTaylor2005Oct 10
Replying to @susanketchen69 @UKinjustice2025 @winterman1975 @OurKingWilliam @kens_hings @Wilfthesecond @WhatTheyF @Wilf_87 @Scybluscy
You sure Susan? Obviously isn't a thing now but I clearly remember constantly deleting messages AND call logs.
2
94
You said the evidence was non existent. So you're ignoring the trial that presented the 'non existent' evidence
Hypocrisy Rising@Rising6247210Oct 7
Replying to @Wilfthesecond @LawHealthTech
Imagine making up things I never said
1
50
I don't know the specifics. I just know the nature of resus was unique. And only seen in an a confirmed case of AE. These are the questions any challenge to the verdict will face.
Neil Ross
@NeilRos55889793Oct 5
Replying to @Wilfthesecond @Spike16642810 @doctorcaldwell @HenryTudorStan @DebbieKennett @GuerrillaCarl @NickBarberX @boydmjohnston @RussellScotland @MartynPitman
OK, you don’t know.
2
95
You'd think by now the Letbyists would know the basics of the case
BJ@boydmjohnstonOct 3
Replying to @Wilfthesecond @doctorcaldwell @RussellScotland @MartynPitman @GuerrillaCarl
There were a lot more than 13 deaths in the period when LL was supposedly murdering babies. Only the deaths when she was on shift were deemed 'suspicious'. The shift / deaths chart shown at the trial was a trumped up fallacy.
2
1
1
7
251
Favourite Letbyist comment ever. It wasn't Letby. It was agreed pathogen that no one can test for. Just so happened to target babies when Lebty was cotside to them.
brianoflan@brianoflan46772Sep 25
Replying to @Wilfthesecond
Also, that is logically untrue. It's always possible for there to be a common cause of death nobody had considered properly. Or a completely unknown pathogen that no test exists for, is a possibility.
2
1
1
149
Load more