I'd promised to give a short elucidation on Islamic Finance, so here is it. I hope I am able to help impact knowledge in my little own way. I also wrote this bearing entrepreneurs, business owners and startup founders in mind. ISF can be used by any & all.

rain please fall 🥺

My sister everybody!😍 So proud of you my darling

No wayyy, RIP legend

If it's not you dissing & throwing unfounded shades like the coward that you are, it's always silly comments like this. You see the way I quoted you? Find the audacity to do the same thing next time. For someone that's expected to be learned, you should try to act like one or even at the very least pretend. I hope God cleanses you of this silliness, and equips you with the essence & beauty of tolerance. Love & light egbon.

I love this inquisition because it questions the foundation of this issue, and this conversation is something we should be having for the collective good. So on this issue, there are two school of thoughts, classical Islam & contemporary Islam. Quran 4:34 got its context from the word "daraba" which then later became translated. Arabic language is very nuance & is also beyond literal interpretations, it can be metaphorical. As such, a number of interpretations have been likened to daraba by contemporary scholars Daraba can mean to set an example It can mean to travel/strike out on a journey It can mean to strike/hit something It can also mean to strike a division/separate. Daraba in a number of ways doesn't necessarily mean to strike or hit. Advocates of the classical Islam would say daraba should be taken literally which means to hit, or to cause a non-injurious strike However, contemporary Islam scholars argue that daraba doesn't necessarily have one literal meaning, hence, it's quite misogynistic to solely treat the meaning as hit or to strike, it can also mean separation, division or even to travel (meaning to leave that premises). Also, there have been reports of the Prophet (PBUH) forbidding men from hitting their wives. In Aisha's report, she noted that the Prophet never beat anyone with hand, neither a woman or a servant, and the only time he was violent with anyone was at the battlefield Also, when a follower asked the Prophet (PBUH) what rights wives had in their home, he said "Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.” Beyond these schools of thought, my argument is that if the word can be inferred to have multiple meanings, then treating it solely as hitting or striking is questionable and perhaps, redundant. If we cannot treat it to mean "separate or to travel", then maybe we shouldn't treat it to mean hit or strike. Notably, the trajectory of the notations of the Prophet (PBUH) can infer feasible intentions. Women are full human beings deserving of dignity, safety, and respect. If a nonviolent interpretation is linguistically defensible and consistent with Islam's broader ethical principles, it deserves serious consideration. And questioning an interpretation is not necessarily questioning Islam. Sometimes, it is an attempt to understand the faith more deeply and build a society in which no woman has to endure violence in the name of religion. It is the same notation by contemporary scholars that led to Indonesia's Domestic Violence Law, and the Indonesian Muslim reformists argued beautifully on this interpretation & the broader ethical principles of Islam which I think many people need to start embracing.