Pretty cool stuff, glad you're enjoying the project.

TS meant well and was an important tool pre-ES6 and when ES6 was gaining widespread adoption. It feels redundant and confusing these days though.

What is considered reading a post, is it clicking a tweet and reading the associated comments? Or is it number of posts seen while scrolling?

There is nothing in my career that I've bet on more than JS and it's worked out so far!

@elonmusk Is there any plans to free up handles from long term suspended accounts?

Gotta have the right tools for the job.

Lol. I'm a sucker for a bad package.

This is the very best way to do things. People WILL step up for sure. The ones that can't/won't are the ones complaining. Sometimes excellence is the minimum value.

Result: a Twitter without a ruling or peasant class, more verified people, less bots, and sustainable income (maybe).

Second, sell checkmarks as planned. People are free to do as they please except impersonate an account who is verified by Twitter internally. Third, suspend habitual impersonators temporarily and accounts displaying bot-like behavior permanently.

@elonmusk here is my idea to solve the checkmark and verified issue. First, verify people as usual, but it remains internal. Incentivize people to verify to prevent impersonation.

Going live to talk about sysadmin things, come and join me! youtu.be/h4IqsffTCZI

☺️

Want to learn how big software projects are composed? I got you. youtu.be/2XDhad47Sjk

Some of the smartest people alive.

You actually don't need to, it looks like the video is back up and the strike removed. I'm glad this has finally been resolved, thanks.

Any update on this? Creator support chat has been wholesale unwilling to work with me on this. My video has now been down two weeks and basic questions around its removal still have not been answered.

Thanks, I will be waiting for that.

I assert that according to the definition of hacking and the examples laid out in the community guidelines (which I reviewed carefully before posting) that my video does not contain hacking instructions.

My original appeal was based on the assertion that it was "harmful and dangerous" as YouTube did not provide me with any specifics. I review the community guidelines closely and reviewed them again after receiving the take down.