your bank statement is overqualified for a yes-or-no question. imagine an app needs to check whether your balance meets a requirement. you upload a statement. Along with the answer, you may have handed over your income, spending habits and financial relationships. one question. a surprising amount of collateral information. this is a useful way to understand what @primus_labs is building. its zkTLS technology helps authenticate data from HTTPS sources and supports selective disclosure. In a suitably designed application, you could prove that your balance clears a threshold while keeping the exact amount private. the application gets evidence for its decision. You keep the details that have nothing to do with it. 🔒 following @primus_labs 👀 keep this handy: s.kaito.ai/n6fcSAe there’s another piece worth understanding: FHE, or fully homomorphic encryption. verifying information and calculating with it are different jobs. FHE allows calculations on encrypted inputs, so the party processing those inputs doesn’t need to read the underlying values. for applications handling sensitive information, that opens up a practical possibility: verify where the data came from, then work with it under encryption. the bank statement example illustrates the idea. The broader question applies wherever an application asks for private records: “how much of this information does the decision actually require?” that’s what makes Primus interesting to me. It gives developers tools to build around a smaller, more precise request for evidence. a yes-or-no question should have a much smaller attachment. which detail would you rather prove than upload?