Hey @ClaudeDevs, can y’all make the Code section an accordion that displays threads or make “Recents” switch over to remote control sessions on selection?
Replying to @barrowjoseph @DenisPeskoff
dataset looked fun so i took a stab at overlaying it with a few orthogonal datasets (demographics, elections, county geo)
pretty fun to see how much local law differs across county/state borders (two near-identical counties on opposite sides of a state line can look completely different)
civic-texture-web.vercel.app…
github: github.com/vu1n/civic-textur…
datasets stitched in:
- LOCUS (yours)
- ACS 5-yr demographics
- county presidential returns '08-'24
- census county geometry + a city→county crosswalk
Meet Puck 🧚 — a digital squatter on your desktop, peeks at what you're doing, comments on it
a deliberately useless computer assistant, built for #BuildSmall @huggingface @Gradio
how many devs are out here rawdogging LLMs like this?
Interesting new SWE/agentic benchmark (DeepSWE) was released yesterday. 113 tasks across 91 repos in 5 languages. Here are interesting things I noticed:
- The evaluation harness (mini-swe-agent) gives every model a single bash tool and the same SI. No vendor editing primitives.
- Eval Prompts are shorter than SWE-Bench Pro, but require 5.5× more code and touch 7 files on average. The idea is to mimic how developers actually talk to agents, short behavioral descriptions, not verbose specs.
- SI describes a specific workflow: find code, reproduce, fix, verify, edge cases, submit. This maps directly onto how the verifier grades, which could bias toward models that follow instructions literally over models that explore more.
- The bash tool is guarded, outputs over 10k chars get truncated. Malformed tool calls get caught and retried with guidance rather than crashing. To prevent to blow up context.
- Mini-swe-agent claims to match or beat 1P harnesses on the same tasks. Claude Opus scored +10pp over Claude Code. Gemini 3.1 Pro scored +20pp over Gemini CLI.
Would love to see how other harness × model combinations will do, e.g. @cursor_ai, @antigravity, @FactoryAI and how well the eval harness does on more general knowledge work, e.g. GDPval.
Great to see the SWE-agent team keep pushing on both the research and eval side. 🤗











