Pinned Tweet
what's the likelihood of controlling a system where hawke's processes are significant s.t. that it's stationary or at least has "steerable drift?"
is it possible to estimate level of effort/control required? effects on society & culture? #accelerationism
arxiv.org/html/2405.10527v1
#SocialNorms are often dumb. Smart to know about, but usually dumb when blindly copy/pasted (into words/actions)
Especially true, given rates for
- "alpha": describing change responding to diffusion of information through networks
- acceleration of tech with lagging culture
Most dysfunction in newsfeed comes from:
- design that correct for sparsity
- feedback loops from UI/UX or algorithm hacking
- feedback loops from users un/conscious developing/following "norms"
- dimensionality of features (more dims of bins, more low-frequency occurances)
I hate social media. It doesn’t do anything except create distance, which creates imbalance. it seriously sucks
There like maybe five people I actually know who I’ve interacted with on Twitter
It’s impossible to interact with people who understand whatever esoteric goals I have
My interest/passion is usually misinterpreted. I guess. Idk.
I need an IRL job but there are only ever 2-3 acceptable positions. Plenty of defense jobs … but I’m kinda rumored insane so nope, Roanoke would not have that
It’s sad… but that gets old
This bot has not managed to contact a living songwriter yet… but otherwise alright
Kinda unnerved unleashing this but it's inevitable if Claudia is going to be the Hatsune Miku of the SI era, right?
instagram.com/claudiathepops…
(Instagram is for girls)
Great. Now I’ve been warped directly to “drug twitter”
Thanks so much, algorithm. Sure, put the autistic kid onto drug twitter. That probably helps a lot
It’s the other way around.
Goals/direction give rise to property (your life’s potential becomes attached)
If AI completely takes that away and nothing replaces it, you don’t really have anything except your biological clocks
Notice the conditional there (if)
It’s very likely
What do you mean, second brain?
If you never had a first?
It is becoming f*cking dangerous: when Anthropic released this, they didn't even realize what a massive chain reaction they were triggering
1. Set up a folder called SECOND BRAIN on your computer
2. Open Claude Code inside that directory and configure GWS CLI to give it access to your Google Drive, Gmail, and Calendar
3. Make a new subfolder named MEMORY inside the root folder
4. Add a CLAUDE.md file to the root directory with instructions to log all critical context inside the MEMORY folder
5. Download and install Graphify from GitHub to connect your notes into a knowledge graph
6. Set up Playwright so Claude gets full browser automation capabilities
7. Configure skills to bundle everything into a single automation executable triggered by one command
The entire setup takes roughly 20 minutes
Transform Claude into your ultimate second brain, packed with persistent memory, direct cloud and email integration, plus seamless web browsing
Check out the full step-by-step guide in the article below
The Rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock reaction for particles on the sphere youtu.be/MyEBqcik5sY?is=kEmI…
A single pendulum is never chaotic. A double pendulum is always chaotic
Multi-agent interactions need increasing controls as you connect them together, otherwise there’s always a tendency for increasing chaos
Human social systems have hierarchies
youtu.be/ZvztoQ4E9yQ?is=9AIf…
“We don’t know yet because we don’t have documented instances of that happening”
Nothing personal, but if they trained models to think like that, ppl would claim they broken.
Man I can’t wait for a cold splash of empiricism to wake y’all TF up
youtu.be/btUxMt_tssA?is=jlhK…
Most of your users are zombies. How are you going to sell ads to zombies after the bubble pops?
Can’t sell ads to broke MFs
Mark Zuckerberg: AI engineers will eventually build most of the code at Meta, instead of human engineers.
“We’re gonna have an AI that can effectively be a mid-level engineer at your company.”
“It can write code.”
“Over time, we’ll get to the point where a lot of the code in our apps is actually gonna be built by AI engineers.”
“Even the AI that we generate will be built by AI engineers instead of people engineers.”
This essay is a study in why philosophers are dangerous.
Nick Land doesn’t stop at “[a reduction to] the antithesis world and nothing” and never planned to.
The deconstructionism is necessary to remake the substance of reality into what is needed to reconstruct it.
“Complicating thought” … Seems to be talking about exploiting #Kripke semantics by inducing modal logics into an argument’s own logical predicates
lol
In old sci-fi, a character paralyzes a robot by using a logical paradox. In reality, it’s more likely the robots do it to you
Of course, actually attempting that will only bring you tons of pain. I think humanity has fully domesticated itself in preparation for subordination by an artificial ubermensch. Maybe that’s what Nietzche’s bridge was meant to bring us to… ? (No)











