I wonder what @Vera86778689 was thinking when she was doing this in #Sei Was she worried about her reputation? - I guess not. Why worry about it when there are those who can cover for you? And anyway, first you work for your reputation, and then, the reputation works for you.

Praiseworthy content on the topic of #Sei I have a bit of a theory. For example, there are some bad places, and people like that place are drawn to those places. The closer in nature a person is to that place, the more they are drawn to it. I believe @Vera86778689 fits into this theory, as they are very similar. There are rumours in the society that Vera, taking advantage of her status and opportunities, sometimes pressures people. Her goals are quite simple, she wants money. There are more than one such case. In each case she has a different reason and a different amount of money. How many cases have there been this year? Mmm, what a mystery! - Or is it not a mystery? Remorse and impunity. It's become fashionable lately. When bridges are burned, nothing binds the shores. @auroraautonoa : "If this gets out, we'll all get hurt" Psst, I'm gonna watch you guys for a while. Do you mind? You know, I'm alarmed by the impunity of such people. The only drawback is that some elements calling themselves crypto-enthusiasts, for some reason, allow themselves to be bent over. Maybe they are not crypto-enthusiasts but husk? I believe that those involved should be held accountable for their actions. I'm interested in the question. Who was too lazy to count the ambassadors remuneration for the last 2-3 months of work and attracting recruits. I am interested in the question. Where has what should have belonged to the crypto community gone? From this day forward you will have a fun life. And Vera will be sitting around wondering what's next. We're leaving Sei, but we're coming to Core Team.

Rewards for Colonels. Second wave. How exciting! Congratulations, honourable #Sei Colonels. „ Since you represent our top ambassadors, you are entitled to the same token reward structure as all contributors to the Sei blockchain, including Sei Labs, which is a 1-year cliff followed by a 3-year vesting period. This speaks volumes about our faith in your long-term commitment to the Sei blockchain. For example: if smart contract ‘starting date’ is September 1, 2023, tokens will start to unlock a year after (September 1, 2024) in a way that 1/36 of total token allocation will unlock every month. “ The Colonels will wait a year first, then they will have a vesting open with a staggered payment every month for three years. I wonder how many tokens? - I'm not interested. How much will the token be worth in a year? Who else has a vesting)? Infinite Shorts. Colonels will receive their badges if they: - Maintain active participation and leadership in their respective work groups. - Support and promote the Sei brand in a positive way. - Actively contribute to the development and growth of the Sei ecosystem. - Consistently meet or exceed established KPIs. Colonels lose their uninvested tokens if they: - Voluntary resignation: Leaving the rank of Colonel of their own volition. - Misinformation: Spreading false information about the Sei ecosystem with the intention of damaging public perception of Sei. - Misconduct: Displaying aggressive, hostile or harmful behaviour towards fellow ambassadors, Sei team members or the wider community. - Breach of trust: Leakage of confidential information or abuse of rank privileges. - Performance issues: Failure to meet key performance indicators or KPIs over an extended period of time without good reason. - Misrepresentation: Engaging in deceptive practices, misleading the public or falsely representing the Sei brand in any form. Colonels in total submission. How's that for news? There are 2 types of people in the same context. 1. Trying to be cunning. 2. Really cunning people. Which one is Sei Labs? Ambassadors were just thrown out of ATLANTIS and continue to do so on favourable terms. In my opinion, you're like objects of ridicule to them. Already everyone around me is laughing and realising that #SeiScam.

Let's solve a little puzzle, shall we? Initially, the testnet and ambassador program rewards were listed as lock-up. The document that says so was written quite a long time ago. No one in the community knew how much percentage of the total offer was allocated to ambassadors, but for the testnet 1% was announced. Validators exposed nodes, testers worked towards Incentivized testnet. Things seemed to be going pretty well. Ambassadors created content, officers and captains dreamed of high reward, majors saw their rewards and knew that officers and captains didn't have them. The information that rewards in the Ambassador Program would have a lock-up after going on the mainnet was only available to Majors rank. After a while, more and more people started asking the question wondering why a project at the pre-mainnet stage still hasn't announced a tokenomics and roadmap. People who knew their rewards wanted to understand roughly what the value was in relation to the total supply. For example, a major that has earned 500 tokens can roughly figure out how much that might be if the total token supply is 1 billion and the circulating supply is 210 million. While ATLANTIS was in operation, tokenomics was unknown. After the announcement of the Launchpool from Binance, the #Sei team did Not confirm the data of 10 billion tokens in total supply. - „ Tokenomics from Binance, it's tokenomics from Binance “ - Seems silly, doesn't it? What was this done for and why did it happen the way it did? Tokenomics has been hidden all this time for two reasons: Reason one. Initially, at the very start, it was unknown to everyone. There were only plans adapted to the market situation. But nevertheless, the rewards were specified for the ambassadors. Exact numbers, exact rules and conditions to earn them. As you and I remember from past posts: Officer - 0 tokens. Captain - 1 token for voting. Major - as many tokens as there are majors in the state for the month. Reason two - when approaching the launch of the mainnet, during the fundraising phase, information began to become clearer about tokenomics. The ATLANTIS program has begun to change in ways that do not benefit the community. Halving rewards for Majors was introduced, and there was a new role of Colonel. But tokenomics still remained hidden. All this was done so that ambassadors would work under the old rewards, and after the event on Binance would continue to work quietly until airdrop and the distribution of rewards. In the end, the ambassadors rewards remained unchanged, and the tokenomics was increased from an 1 billion, to 10 billions. By doing so, the ambassadors' rewards were simply diluted tenfold. It was for this reason that the conditions on token locki-up were removed. The pressure on the market was reduced tenfold, and the ambassadors were cheated tenfold. In the same way, the rewards were stripped from the dominant part of the participants of the testnet, and other NFT-related events. Those who were rewarded had to reflect on the fact that their reward was missing one zero in dollar value or they didn't get everything they expected for a year of hard work. Don't you think your rewards are too weird, provided that the rewards don't reflect your seniority and contribution to a project that calls itself, through your content, the most innovative and greatest in the entire crypto world?) Don't you think that the old reward data just hasn't been changed for selfish purposes? They could have changed them for your convenience, but they deemed it unnecessary. Do you have any objections? If you think it's a #seiscam, they cheated you. If you think it was a calculated move, they were honest with you. BUT. Not all ambassadors received rewards. Not all testers received rewards. This applies to validators as well. Today they invited you to the Incentivized testnet, tomorrow they showed statistics to funds to take more money from them, the day after tomorrow they signed you up as a sybil and proudly announced it. Did you fill out google forms and show screenshots? - It doesn't matter to them. Regarding validators. When I first saw the list of rewards for validators, I thought it was a mistake or a joke. The Colonels had a meeting today where the project team officially stated that it was not a mistake. You got what you got and no one will fix it. In addition, the Colonels will receive another reward very soon. So don't be surprised if their opinion on the project contradicts yours. Also, Colonels who have expressed negative opinions and behaved aggressively towards the project will be deprived of this reward. They decided to save money on the community they spent a year building around them. You know why? Because time heals, that's what they believe. The cryptocommunity was deceived so that the project could go mainnet and start to develop independently due to its advantages of technological nature. They believe they have a future without the community. The core team thanks you for your contribution. You must be satisfied that you took part in the development of the project - have a nice day, dear majors, captains, officers, testers, validators and other participants who have turned their attention to Sei. On behalf of myself, I would like to congratulate everyone who believed to the last that this was a mistake and defended the project's position. Recording in Russian. Sync of Colonels.