American Supremacist. (x/acc)

๐™Š๐™‰๐™‡๐™„๐™‰๐™€
Joined January 2007
In retrospect, it was Inevitable โ€œLet that sink inโ€ โ€”@ElonMusk
4,637
5,803
436
57,616
10,158,349
Congratulations to @maddow on getting the first exclusive interview with Ilhan Omar after the raid on her home.
13
7
132
8,493
To the best of Ilhan Omarโ€™s knowledge, she has not had sexual intercourse with her brother.
17
13
1
196
9,187
Q: โ€œDid you marry your brother?โ€ Normal people: โ€œNo.โ€ Ilhan Omar: โ€œNot to my knowledge.โ€ ๐Ÿ˜ฌ
73
180
18
1,628
35,607
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Hello @IlhanMN
โ˜Ž๏ธReport marriage fraud: 866-DHS-2-ICE ๐Ÿ’
402
7,701
232
27,658
1,212,202
So Abdul throws a fit when we call him by his middle name and Ilhan demands we call her a fake name? I canโ€™t keep up with these people.
4
19
1
243
9,423
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @NafisaFaiWashCo
The fake story has now been retracted. You lied. oregonjournalismproject.org/โ€ฆ
4
46
1
808
9,615
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Democrats want to reward 30+ million illegal aliens who broke our laws with U.S. citizenship but they want to put Elon Musk, who has contributed invaluably to this country, both financially and through innovation, in jail.
16
109
2
560
18,399
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Theyโ€™re telling us exactly what they plan to do
Democrat Texas Senate Candidate James Talarico: โ€œI think that the Supreme Court needs to be overhauledโ€
15
155
1
797
21,092
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
WTF. Ilhan Omar is identified under two completely different names. Now we know why sheโ€™s been so quiet. Sheโ€™s done for.
64
451
8
3,236
47,825
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
Your only posts about George Soros are defending him. He spent $100M on the midterms. โ€˜Itโ€™s ok when we do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!โ€™
9
123
6
1,268
11,779
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Thank you for incentivizing Elon Musk to go even harder in supporting Republican candidates.
Kara Swisher says Elon Musk might be in jail right now if Kamala Harris was in office and โ€œhe knows whatโ€™s comingโ€ if Democrats take back power.
17
13
123
5,030
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
Kind of insane coming from the party who imported 30+ million illegal aliens to replace the current voting population.
1
29
1
379
7,440
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk @alx
Flashback:
10
29
2,245
153,328
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Everything is on the ballot. Watch the midterms move on Polymarket.
37
22
2
101
65,158
ALX (x/acc) ๐ŸŽƒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk @alx
Elon be like
4
11
1,048
64,608
Getting rid of the independent Fact-Checking program is the best thing Meta has ever done. For those who are unfamiliar, it allowed a handful of journalists at media outlets (overwhelmingly left wing) to apply Fact Checks directly on any content they wanted, which would immediately kill its reach. If you got more than 3 of these in a 90 day period, your page was effectively useless as it would no longer be recommended to non-followers. This enabled a few unaccountable journalists to target people they didnโ€™t like at will and I witnessed them do it while ignoring false claims coming from the left. Now theyโ€™ve moved to a Community Notes style approach like ๐•. We canโ€™t allow this progress to be undone, especially not at the behest of a Soros-backed AG.
A Soros-backed AG should not be the arbiter of free speech online. Of course theyโ€™re coming after โ€œCommunity Notesโ€ style features and want to go back to โ€œIndependent Fact Checkingโ€ because it will put control back into the hands of a select few that can be pressured by the government. This sets a dangerous precedent.
9
18
90
11,527
They have been warned.
The last time Elon posted โ€œmessage receivedโ€ it cost California over $100 billion. Wonder how bad it is this timeโ€ฆ
5
44
1
551
18,083
A Soros-backed AG should not be the arbiter of free speech online. Of course theyโ€™re coming after โ€œCommunity Notesโ€ style features and want to go back to โ€œIndependent Fact Checkingโ€ because it will put control back into the hands of a select few that can be pressured by the government. This sets a dangerous precedent.
1
23
1
81
16,303