Pinned Tweet
In retrospect, it was Inevitable
โLet that sink inโ โ@ElonMusk
Congratulations to @maddow on getting the first exclusive interview with Ilhan Omar after the raid on her home.
Q: โDid you marry your brother?โ
Normal people: โNo.โ
Ilhan Omar: โNot to my knowledge.โ
๐ฌ
So Abdul throws a fit when we call him by his middle name and Ilhan demands we call her a fake name? I canโt keep up with these people.
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
Replying to @NafisaFaiWashCo
The fake story has now been retracted.
You lied.
oregonjournalismproject.org/โฆ
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
Democrats want to reward 30+ million illegal aliens who broke our laws with U.S. citizenship but they want to put Elon Musk, who has contributed invaluably to this country, both financially and through innovation, in jail.
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
WTF. Ilhan Omar is identified under two completely different names.
Now we know why sheโs been so quiet.
Sheโs done for.
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
Your only posts about George Soros are defending him.
He spent $100M on the midterms.
โItโs ok when we do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!โ
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
Kind of insane coming from the party who imported 30+ million illegal aliens to replace the current voting population.
ALX (x/acc) ๐๐บ๐ธ retweeted
Everything is on the ballot.
Watch the midterms move on Polymarket.
Getting rid of the independent Fact-Checking program is the best thing Meta has ever done. For those who are unfamiliar, it allowed a handful of journalists at media outlets (overwhelmingly left wing) to apply Fact Checks directly on any content they wanted, which would immediately kill its reach. If you got more than 3 of these in a 90 day period, your page was effectively useless as it would no longer be recommended to non-followers.
This enabled a few unaccountable journalists to target people they didnโt like at will and I witnessed them do it while ignoring false claims coming from the left.
Now theyโve moved to a Community Notes style approach like ๐.
We canโt allow this progress to be undone, especially not at the behest of a Soros-backed AG.
A Soros-backed AG should not be the arbiter of free speech online.
Of course theyโre coming after โCommunity Notesโ style features and want to go back to โIndependent Fact Checkingโ because it will put control back into the hands of a select few that can be pressured by the government.
This sets a dangerous precedent.
A Soros-backed AG should not be the arbiter of free speech online.
Of course theyโre coming after โCommunity Notesโ style features and want to go back to โIndependent Fact Checkingโ because it will put control back into the hands of a select few that can be pressured by the government.
This sets a dangerous precedent.




















