Alarmists tell us both that small changes can cause tipping points that lead to big changes, while also telling us that the rate of change we are seeing today is unprecedented in nature.
Of course if the tipping points exist, then big changes would have occurred in the past too.
New research indicates that a feedback loop is accelerating the melting of Antarctic ice, bringing its tipping point closer and accelerating the sea level rise that threatens 680 million people worldwide.
en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br/…
Here's a review of some of the main models. They predicted everything from ice free in 2000 to 2085. So of course one of them will be right.
tos.org/oceanography/article…
No, thin skinned guy with comments off, they aren't both valid. "Climate Change" was invented in an effort to blame CO2 for both heat AND cold. Except it's not actually true. The number of extreme cold events is decreasing.
*#GlobalWarming* and *#ClimateChange* are both valid terms that mean different things.
1/6
ALT Two images of Earth illustrating the difference between Global Warming and Climate Change. Global Warming: an orange Earth with a schematic of infrared from the surface being redirected downwards by the atmosphere. It's labelled "The gradual increase of the surface temperature of Earth" Climate Change: a blue green Earth showing a desert, a schematic volcano, and a schematic hurricane. It's labelled "The long-term change in global weather patterns".
Well, my thin-skinned friend with comments turned off, here's how renewables did last time the NDP was in charge:
How it started? How's it going?
In 2023, 92% of Canada's growth in renewables came from Alberta. In 2026, 99% collapse of the renewables market due to the UCP's regressive policies.
Reminder: renewables in Alberta were driven by the private sector like Amazon, RBC, TELUS who bought renewable and created good jobs in our province.
Absolutely self-defeating. Policy matters #ableg
Being thrown over something is most definitely NOT equivalent to orbiting it. A baseball player hits a home run over a pitcher. It does not orbit the pitcher.
When did Trump stop challenging our sovereignty? That's right- around the time the election ended. He was only doing it to boost Carney, knowing very well he'd be able to get concessions from him.
I see our media cannot understand that we might have been Elbows Up when our sovereignty was being challenged, but we now need to pivot to get as good a deal as possible. PM Carney knows what he is doing. @CBCNews needs to move on.
I'll repost since the asshole you are replying to blocks anyone who makes a counterpoint.
By your logic, we understand how hard hats stop stuff from falling on your head. We do not understand viral infections to anywhere near the same degree.
And if we could prevent viral infection life long, would we have longer happier lives or more autoimmune diseases (hygiene hypothesis)?
There's more than enough unknowns to require an RCT here. 4/
The bigger thing though is that you stand with a guy who has to run for the block button to handle gentle criticism like this. That strongly suggests your ideas are very weak.
teapaw.org/annonymous24601/status…
Annonymous24601 retweeted
RCT s are needed when you don't understand how the system under study works or when interactions are too numerous to model
Filters) are not, & simple statistics are probably enough. The real issue is what is the transmission bottleneck for diseases. That's on MDs & researchers
