Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul) header
Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul) profile picture

Transport blogger and high school Social Science teacher. He/Him. Fan of stand-up comedy, musicals, politics, Disneyland, Pokemon GO.

Sydney, NSW
Joined March 2009
Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)Photo by Bambul Shakibaei (@bambul)
Who is this guy? And why is he on my TV? Get him off!
3
2
2
23
Bambul Shakibaei retweeted
This post from @JDVance 👀
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
9
7
32
9,011
UPDATE — Newcastle Light Rail: 4k/day Canberra Light Rail: 17k/day Sydney Metro: 76k/day Sydney Light Rail (L2): 80k/day
Approximate daily patronage for the 3 new rail lines opened in Australia so far this year: Newcastle Light Rail: 4k/day Canberra Light Rail: 17k/day Sydney Metro: 76k/day
2
1
5
Replying to @bambul
There were 300,000 passengers on Friday and 200,000 passengers on Saturday. He is keen to see the weekday numbers for next week when Monday rolls around, as this will be a more normal number.
1
1
109
So #SydneyMetro had 140,000 trips on on Sunday and 63,000 trips on Monday. For comparison, on an average day in May 2018, total patronage on each line was 231,000 trips on T4/SCO, 393,000 trips on T2/T3/T8, and 515,000 trips T1/CCN/BMT. Source: transport.nsw.gov.au/data-an…
1
102
Bumped into Hugh Lawson at Bankstown this morning during the opening weekend festivities. Asked him a few questions and he was able to tell me a few new things about the line. A thread. 🧵
1
23
1,346
There were 300,000 passengers on Friday and 200,000 passengers on Saturday. He is keen to see the weekday numbers for next week when Monday rolls around, as this will be a more normal number.
1
1
3
333
The lack of guards or drivers means that when the line sees delays or disruptions, it can recover much more quickly. He thinks about half an hour would be normal for recovering from delays. End thread.
2
4
226
Took the metro out to Bankstown from Waterloo this morning. Had a quick chat to Howard Collin, who pulled out a metro badge from his pocket and gave it to me. Definite highlight!
4
47
1,768
Howard’s Collins* (silly autocorrect)
1
2
177
And I only just noticed that it autocorrected Howard to Howard's. Sigh.
1
71
Bambul Shakibaei retweeted
🤭 It's official... the Southwest Metro line between Bankstown and Sydenham is now open 🎉 💙 🥰 Here's to falling in love with a new way to travel Ⓜ️ 🚊
2
15
1
54
1,996
Look at that little guy go!
133
A few of my thoughts on the new WSI airport and Bankstown metro extensions opening this week
4
2
1
39
2,644
That was a rapid response to public opposition. I wonder how much an election being months away played into it. A shame, there were good elements to the proposed changes, albeit with the known trade-offs. smh.com.au/politics/nsw/publ…
5
28
1,007
Another positive: current government acknowledges that Sydney Metro, and the previous government that did the heavy lifting on it, is actually a good thing. A decade ago they spent a lot of effort downplaying it and promising to cancel / scale it back.
1
3
259
Thankfully, they no longer seem to hold these opinions. Just about everyone loves the metro now.
1
3
136
Bambul Shakibaei retweeted
Dites-vous que les automobilistes qui n'arrivent pas à estimer le gabarit de leur voiture en franchissant ces barrières, sont les mêmes qui nous disent parfaitement maîtriser leur gabarit quand il s'agit de frôler les cyclistes en les doublant à qqes centimètres #ViolenceRoutière
🐫 Forget speed bumps. 📸 Forget speed camera's. 🚫 Forget road signs. Car drivers fear nothing more than a scratch on their paint. And overestimate the size or their car (amongst other things). Crucial knowledge if you want to lower speeds. (🎞️ by David Ho)
6
34
1
411
26,050