🚨 Reminder: people like Sam Altman and Dario Amodei should NOT have any more rights or power over the future than anyone else. If you are bothered by AI companies’ safety practices, by the recent incidents and where AI seems to be heading, or by any personal harm you may have already suffered, you can engage, mobilize, and use legal means to shape AI's present and future. Contact your congressional representative or NGOs focused on consumer protection, share your concerns, and support a legal claim. Regardless of the complexity of the AI alignment problem (which, by the way, we might never solve), AIs are not legal entities; companies are. As legal entities offering products and services to society, those companies must abide by the law if they want to continue existing. They cannot offer products and services that endanger the public; if they do, they can and should be held liable. Maximum safety should be their priority, as it is with countless products such as home appliances, cars, and planes. If they admit it is not possible to provide safe AI products and services, they should not be allowed to offer them. There is no magic, mystery, or doubt: the law exists to protect society against harm. If a company wants to exist, it must abide by society's rules. Also, you are not powerless: even if you are not inside an AI lab, the law exists to protect you, and legal means exist to hold companies accountable if they act in ways that pose danger. 👉 Read my full article (and join my newsletter's 102,700+ subscribers) below:

🚨 Let me translate what @sama is saying here: - We'll need to rewrite the architecture of the internet & the financial system. - In a few months, traditional cybersecurity will not help. - The only way to solve the crisis will be to rely on AI to redesign everything.

I recommend NOT giving AI agents access to your personal accounts.