Ayatollah of the Sacred Doctrine of Physical Removal & High Cleric of Ancapistan.
Ancapistan
Joined April 2022
- Tweets36.7K
- Following715
- Followers352
- Likes93.1K
Pinned Tweet
Il faut vraiment être le dernier des bouseux à la psychologie moutonnière pour croire que le pédophile notoire Keynes avait la moindre affinité avec le libéralisme ou le libre-échange.
Le keynésianisme, c'est le triomphe du socialisme le plus insidieux.
youtu.be/uZYAFaHSsZY
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
What would be cooler is if they were to adopt an open publlshing, copyright-free model and post free PDFs online. You know, like it's 2026, and they are actual libertarians who want to spread the word. But the chances of that are low. gcc.edu/Home/News-Archive/Ne…
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
A principled and consistent free market anarchist must hate states with passion, especially if it's a state like Israel.
A principled free market anarchist must hate socialist nationalist ideologies with passion, particularly Zionism.
Zionism must be destroyed. Eradicated.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Estos tipos no hacen más exponer sus mentes débiles. Es evidente que no comprenden lo que leen o que, simplemente sus emociones fueron afectadas, Hoppe no niega el Holocausto.
Si van a llamar negacionismo al cuestionamiento, no son más que unos completos dogmáticos.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
So says the IP fascist and opponent of just war theory, warning that “Islamic totalitarian states pose a severe threat to the security of the United States,” adding that a way to defeat these regimes “is to kill up to hundreds of thousands of their supporters.” This, he said, would “shrink popular support for extremist ideas to a small minority of the population,” instead of the 40% which he claims supports such regimes now ... stephankinsella.com/2007/12/…
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
This is a very weak article. The objections made to Argumentation Ethics were refuted either by Hoppe, by Kinsella, or even by myself (cf. propertyandfreedom.org/2016/…, stephankinsella.com/publicat…, propertyandfreedom.org/2026/…). The whole "very few people accept it" argument is an ad populum.
Besides, it mistakingly assumes that Hoppe's cultural views must have its foundations in Argumentation Ethics, when that's clearly not the case. Hoppe is mearly stating how members of libertarian communities should behave in order to preserve them in the long term. It is obvious that a community with a majority of democrats and communists won't remain anarchist for long. He's not advocating agressive violence, merely the excercise of property rights and defensing violence.
Hoppe is a) a consistent libertarian who takes libertarian political philosophy to its ultimate consequences, and b) a realist libertarian who knows what is required to preserve a libertarian order in the long term.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Yeah, people are running hit pieces on Hoppe.
They're doing all kinds of mental gymnastics to pile up as many criticisms as they can, regardless that they've been addressed many times over the years.
If someone is writing a hit piece you know that it will be incompetent. Because, if they had a solid, competent refutation, they'd use it instead.
I know what proof looks like. I know what a competent refutation looks like. And I know how competent people reveal either when they have something of substance.
Marxists write lots of words to bury the fact that they have nothing of substance to say. Same here.
This is a very weak article. The objections made to Argumentation Ethics were refuted either by Hoppe, by Kinsella, or even by myself (cf. propertyandfreedom.org/2016/…, stephankinsella.com/publicat…, propertyandfreedom.org/2026/…). The whole "very few people accept it" argument is an ad populum.
Besides, it mistakingly assumes that Hoppe's cultural views must have its foundations in Argumentation Ethics, when that's clearly not the case. Hoppe is mearly stating how members of libertarian communities should behave in order to preserve them in the long term. It is obvious that a community with a majority of democrats and communists won't remain anarchist for long. He's not advocating agressive violence, merely the excercise of property rights and defensing violence.
Hoppe is a) a consistent libertarian who takes libertarian political philosophy to its ultimate consequences, and b) a realist libertarian who knows what is required to preserve a libertarian order in the long term.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Why is Yaron Brook trashing Hans-Hermann Hoppe for his comments about Gaza?
Simple.
The Objectivist movement he's a part of is a stalking horse for Zionism.
I detailed Objectivism's Jewish supremacist ethos below:
👇👇👇
theoccidentalobserver.net/20…
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
"You're not opposing Israel the right way, which is why I support Israel."
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Mises: sanctions impoverish the civilian population and not the state
This retard: woah looks like the Mises Institute is betraying Mises!
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
I’m curious to whether you could tell us why child rape should be illegal without presupposing our theory on property law to be correct.
I never saw any cp. @TaxedBrassDied is now in the situation where either he saw cp and didn't report it (a crime) or he has to admit he's lying because I made him mad.
This is what the law would look like under libertarianism. It would just be a witch hunt with zero evidence.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Pourtant, si l’entreprise était sans utilité sociale, pourquoi aurait-elle émergé spontanément dans la société des hommes, à une époque où ils étaient bien plus libres qu’aujourd’hui? À une époque où il leur était plus facile de la refuser pour inutilité ? liberalie.substack.com/p/eco…
Pourtant, si l’entreprise était sans utilité sociale, pourquoi aurait-elle émergé spontanément dans la société des hommes, à une époque où ils étaient bien plus libres qu’aujourd’hui? À une époque où il leur était plus facile de la refuser pour inutilité ?
liberalie.substack.com/p/eco…
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
I feel lucky to be an "honorary Aryan." Out of the millions of Jews living in Nazi Germany, the Germans consider me an 'Ehrenarier' ... they spared me persecution & granted me some rights, more rights than most Jews, even though I'm Jewish. - Sincerely, Stephanie von Hohenlohe, an Austrian Jew (d. 1972)
I feel lucky to be Israeli.
Out of 14m Palestinians in the Middle East, Arab Israelis are the *only* ones that get a vote.
Palestinians in West Bank haven't voted since 2006, stuck under a 90 year old dictator.
Lebanese Palestinians don't even get the citizenship.
Jordanian Palestinians have a.........king.
You may not like this, but the best thing to happen to Palestinians is to live inside Israel.
Eat your heart out.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Avant l’élection : « Un Apartheid ? Alors que les Arabes votent ? »
Après l’élection : « Les Arabes ont 3 sièges et demi 😱😱😱😱😱 C’EST UN ATTENTAT »
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Murray Rothbard — che era ebreo e conosceva a fondo le correnti culturali del mondo ebraico — ha dato del sionismo una definizione spietata, considerandolo una forma aggressiva di nazionalismo collettivista basata sul furto di terra e sull'alleanza con l'imperialismo.
Nei suoi scritti chiave sul tema (in particolare nel saggio del 1967 War Guilt in the Middle East e nei suoi articoli sul Libertarian Forum come The Massacre del 1982), Rothbard definisce il sionismo attraverso tre elementi precisi:
Un nazionalismo etno-statale legato alla mistica di "sangue e suolo":Rothbard descrive il sionismo non come una difesa dell'identità ebraica o della libertà individuale, ma come un'ideologia devota alla «mistica di sangue e suolo della Palestina» (blood-and-soil mystique), ricalcata sui peggiori nazionalismi europei del XIX e XX secolo. Metteva in contrasto il sionismo con il "territorialismo" e con l'ebraismo diasporico cosmopolita, evidenziando come il sionismo avesse trasformato un'eredità culturale e religiosa in una macchina bellica statalista.
Un'impresa fondata sulla violazione sistematica della proprietà privata:Dal punto di vista anarcocapitalista, la condanna di Rothbard è radicale: il sionismo operativo e lo Stato d'Israele sono definiti come un progetto fondato su «una massiccia espropriazione della proprietà altrui e sull'espulsione forzata della popolazione autoctona dalla propria terra». Per Rothbard, i contadini e i proprietari arabi palestinesi erano i legittimi possessori di quelle terre per usucapione e lavoro (homesteading), e il sionismo ha usato l'aggressione militare e le leggi statali per cacciarli e confiscare i loro beni.
Uno strumento dell'imperialismo e una negazione del libertarismo:Rothbard ha sempre rigettato la narrazione di Israele come "piccolo baluardo della libertà e della democrazia accerchiato". Lo definiva uno Stato aggressore, coloniale e militarista, nato con l'aiuto dell'imperialismo britannico e mantenuto in vita dai sussidi e dalle armi dell'imperialismo americano.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Secession would be far closer to the founders' solution to the biggest government in history rather than just choosing one of two parties to run it.
