Bart Fox retweeted
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about: 🚨So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya. Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
Bart Fox retweeted
HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
Bart Fox retweeted
🚨🚨 THE BIG MAMDANI CON IS EXPOSED 🚨🚨
Rudy Giuliani just EXPLODED.
Democrats didn’t just win New York City.
They stole it.
A bombshell audit just uncovered 228,000 FRAUDULENT VOTES — more than enough to erase Zohran Mamdani’s entire 207,570-vote “victory.”
Let that sink in.
Out of the votes examined:
• 7% came from nonexistent voter records
• 6% used fake Social Security numbers
• 10% belonged to people who don’t even live in New York
• 1% had no Social Security number at all
That’s nearly a quarter of a million phantom ballots.
Giuliani didn’t hold back:
“Do I think the Democratic Party cheated in this election? The answer is a RESOUNDING YES. They are the most crooked enterprise in the history of the United States.”
This wasn’t an election.
This was a heist.
Zohran Mamdani is sitting in City Hall as an illegitimate mayor — installed by fraud, phantom voters, and the same dirty tricks we’ve seen before.
The numbers don’t lie.
The truth is out.
And the establishment is already trying to bury it.
Share this everywhere.
Demand a real investigation.
The people of New York — and America — deserve better than this con.
#MamdaniCon #ElectionIntegrity #RudyGiuliani
W.H.G
Bart Fox retweeted
Keep talking about this, the protests in France are FUNDED AND ORGANIZED
“Emmanuel Macron can go to Fox News Digital and see the 54 names of groups that we've identified, and they are specific to the communist, socialist, far-left network that is in Europe and in the world. They work with the Islamist groups — that's why you're going to see the Palestinian flag along with these images of the hammer and sickle in all of these protests”
“You don't see the French flag flying in order for them to get a better France. They're trying to destroy the nation, and we can see this spreading throughout the world.”⠀
I made a post earlier about this highlighting all the groups, here is a breakdown of each group and their affiliation:
Communist and socialist youth groups:
- Communist Youth of Greece
- La Jeunesse Communiste (visible with hammer-and-sickle and “Class War” banners)
- Le Poing Levé (“The Raised Fist”; linked to Révolution Permanente)
- Union de la Jeunesse Communiste (UJC)
Communist, Marxist, Trotskyist and Revolutionary-Socialist Organizations
- International Communist League (Trotskyist)
- Jeunesse du Monde (linked to Organisation Communiste de France)
- La France insoumise (LFI / France Unbowed)
- Nouveau Parti anticapitaliste – L’Anticapitaliste (NPA)
- Organisation communiste révolutionnaire
- Parti communiste français (PCF; French Communist Party; leader Fabien Roussel publicly supported demonstrators)
- Parti des Indigènes de la République (PIR)
- Parti de l’égalité socialiste (Trotskyist)
- Revolutionary Communist Group (British)
- Révolution Permanente (Trotskyist)
- World Socialist Web Site (Trotskyist media)
Muslim Student and Pro-Palestine Organizations
- Union juive française pour la paix (UJFP)
- Urgence Palestine
Here are the troops in America tired to funding and organizing the protests:
- BreakThrough News (New York based; Neville Roy Singham network)
- Indian Alliance Paris (Neville Roy Singham network and People’s Forum ties)
The same protest networks organizing mass protests in America are also involved in the France protests
This is a global coordinated effort to bring down western civilization
Bart Fox retweeted
NEW: Man Is Early Voting In Tennessee Local Election & It’s Looking Rigged 🚨
He Was Asked If He Was Republican Or Democrat
Those Walking In Saying Democrat Are Just Handed A Ballot
After Identifying As A Republican He Needed Photo ID, Voter Registration Card, They Attempted To Deny Voting For Switching Apartments At The Same Address & He Was Hassled
Listen To This:
“Breaking news, I got some interesting news from our local voting station here in Tennessee. So this is a early voting. We got a couple more days to vote. So I went in there with my dad to vote. He's a Republican. Here's how this just went down:
Hi. Are you who are you voting for?
First off, why does that matter?
But anyway, he said republican.
Oh, okay. Well, I need to see your ID.
Okay. He gives them their ID.
Well, I need to see your voting card.
Sir, I haven't had my voting card in years, but I know I'm registered to vote. I've got it in the mail. It should be in your system. Can you please look it up for me?
Okay. Fine. I'll look up for you.
They looked it up for him.
Yeah. I found you
Are you still here? Yeah. I'm still in that same residence except for I've switched apartments.
Oh, you can't vote today. Well, okay. You can vote today as long as we switch this.
What is going on with these guys?
And by the way, as we were leaving, another person came in the room and said, what are you voting for? She said democrat. Gave her the paper and walked on in there. No ID, no voting card, no issues, no nothing.
Stay safe, America.”
Bart Fox retweeted
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was destroyed in 1009 AD, on the orders of the Fatimid Caliph Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Attackers used picks and hammers to smash the Aedicule (the tomb of Christ) and parts of the structure, followed by a fire. However, the lower levels of the sepulchre survived beneath the rubble. The order was part of a broader wave of anti-Christian and anti-Jewish policies and forced conversions across Fatimid territories...
On October 18, 1009 AD, the noon sun burned like a white flame over the Holy City as the first hammer struck stone. Within the vaulted gloom of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the holiest shrine in Christendom, the sound reverberated like thunder. Pillars cracked, marble splintered, and the air filled with choking dust. Men with axes and torches—agents of the Fatimid caliph Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah—tore at the columns, toppled the altar, and pried loose the gilded panels that adorned the tomb of Christ.
Smoke rose from the nave as fires consumed what hammers could not. By nightfall, the great basilica lay in ruin. Its roof had caved in, its walls reduced to rubble, its sacred foundation hacked down to the bare bedrock.
The Tomb of the Resurrection was gone.
. . .
The church they destroyed had stood for nearly seven centuries. Built under the orders of Emperor Constantine the Great in the early fourth century, it had been the beating heart of Christian pilgrimage. This was where Saint Helena, Constantine’s mother, was said to have discovered the True Cross. Here, over the rocky hill of Golgotha and the cave believed to have once held the body of Jesus, Constantine’s architects had raised a complex of soaring domes, colonnades, and courtyards—a house of stone for the story of salvation.
Through centuries of invasion, earthquakes, and shifting empires, it had endured: rebuilt after the Persians burned it in 614, repaired under Arab rule after 638, and maintained as a symbol of coexistence in the city many faiths called holy.
But Al-Hakim, the erratic and ruthless Fatimid caliph who ruled Egypt and much of the Levant, would not endure it. By the turn of the eleventh century, his eccentricity had turned to persecution. Known as “the Mad Caliph” even by some of his own courtiers, Al-Hakim proclaimed himself divine, outlawed certain foods, ordered dogs killed for their impurity, and persecuted Jews and Christians alike. He banned Christian processions, forbade the rebuilding of churches, and accused monks and priests of fraud for claiming miracles at the Holy Sepulchre.
Then, in October 1009, Al-Hakim issued the decree that shocked the world: the complete destruction of the Christian shrine in Jerusalem. His soldiers, led by a governor from Ramla, carried it out with brutal precision—burning, hacking, and prying apart even the tomb itself until nothing sacred remained.
News of the desecration spread like wildfire through the Christian world. In Constantinople, Emperor Basil II denounced the outrage; in Rome, Pope Sergius IV is said to have issued a fiery letter condemning the act and calling for divine vengeance. To the faithful, the annihilation of the Holy Sepulchre was not merely an insult, it was an existential assault on the very heart of Christendom. Pilgrims who had once flocked to Jerusalem now returned with tales of ruins and ashes.
#archaeohistories
Bart Fox retweeted
To my American friends: if you don't want to repeat France's mistakes, read this.
In 1983, kids from the French suburbs, mostly sons and daughters of North African immigrants, marched from Marseille to Paris. Their demand was simple: treat us as French. Equality. Same rules, same country.
A year later, the Socialist Party captured that energy. SOS Racisme was born, with its little yellow hand and the slogan "Touche pas à mon pote" (Hands off my buddy). Concerts, celebrities, prime-time TV. On paper, a beautiful anti-racist movement. In practice, it changed the deal.
The message to an entire generation stopped being "become French, this country is yours." It became "you are different, you are a victim, and France owes you." The right to difference replaced the duty to belong. Anti-racism became a political weapon and a moral alibi for the left.
Assimilation is a demanding promise: you take on the language, the history, the codes, and in exchange the nation adopts you completely. We abandoned that promise. Instead of building the conditions for assimilation, we built the conditions for resentment.
Then add socialism on top, and you get a lethal cocktail.
A school system that stopped teaching and started preaching. Fewer fundamentals, more grievance. Kids who struggle to write a paragraph but can recite that France is a colonial, systemically racist country. A welfare state that teaches you the country owes you everything and you owe it nothing. A political class that explains every failure by discrimination, never by choices, effort or culture.
Tell a teenager for 40 years that he's the victim of the country he lives in, and don't be surprised when he treats it like an enemy.
Look at France right now. Since mid-September, a high school "movement" has turned into weeks of street clashes: nearly 700 police officers injured, more than 200 students hurt. On October 17, a nationwide day of protest that started over fuel prices and the cost of living. The Prime Minister himself said it was no longer a student movement but urban violence. And the far left tied the day to colonial memory and the 1961 Algerian massacre in Paris. A protest about gas prices, rewired into a trial of the nation itself. That's the software we installed in the 80s, running at full speed.
Now look at New York.
What I see forming there is the exact alliance we've had in France for 20 years: hard-left economics plus identity grievance, with political Islam welcomed as an ally instead of recognized as a problem. We even have a word for it: islamo-gauchisme. The far left needs a new oppressed class and new voters. Islamists need a political shield. Each uses the other.
To be clear: this is not about Muslims as people. Millions of French Muslims are fully, proudly French, and they are often the first victims of this alliance, because it locks their kids into a victim identity and hands their neighborhoods to the most radical voices.
It's about a political model. And I've watched it play out for four decades.
America's superpower has always been assimilation. You show up, you become American. Hyphen optional, flag mandatory. The day you replace that with "you are a victim and this country owes you," you've started the French experiment.
We ran it. I can tell you how it ends.
Don't.
Bart Fox retweeted
🚨This is a MUST READ: it’s a post from a French Citizen: Brivael Le Pogam, this is the best description of what has occurred in France I have seen, read his words:
Le Pogam: “To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.”
Hope that wakes you up…
Vote RED 🇺🇸
Bart Fox retweeted
🚨 EXPOSED: THE DOMINION LIST — McConnell, Thune, Newsom & Warren accused of taking millions in bribes to rig 2026 midterms and block Trump’s Save America Act!
A former Dominion Voting Systems employee has come forward with a massive “Dominion List” exposing how top politicians from both parties accepted millions in bribes and kickbacks from the notorious voting machine company.
The whistleblower claims these payoffs were made in exchange for handing Dominion lucrative contracts to supply machines for the 2026 midterms — machines that could be used to manipulate results and keep the deep state in power.
The same corrupt network is accused of working overtime to block President Trump’s landmark Save America Act, the one piece of legislation designed to finally secure American elections from fraud, foreign interference, and machine manipulation once and for all.
The explosive list reportedly names a rogues’ gallery of power-hungry operatives, including the only two Republicans on it — Senate leaders Mitch McConnell and John Thune — along with radical leftists Bernie Sanders, AOC, both California Senators, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Senator Elizabeth Warren, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker.
According to the insider, these politicians took the bribes to push Dominion’s machines into their states while simultaneously sabotaging the Save America Act and advancing a communist-style takeover of the electoral system. The whistleblower describes it as a coordinated coup inside our democracy, where elected officials sold out the American people to protect their own power and keep President Trump from restoring election integrity.
This is the smoking gun the deep state never wanted exposed.
While President Trump fights to pass the Save America Act and drain the swamp, these Dominion-funded politicians are working to steal the 2026 midterms and silence the voice of the people.
Share this everywhere so more eyes see the truth!
Bart Fox retweeted
The NFL and the Philadelphia Eagles almost killed Jalen Hurts for a Week 5 international showcase.
The full details of what happened behind closed doors in London just surfaced, and the negligence is staggering.
Before kickoff in London, Hurts was in a hospital bed until 4:00 AM undergoing emergency vascular testing. Medical staff instructed him not to sleep because sleep was considered an active health risk.
Instead of shutting down their $255 million franchise quarterback, the team cleared him to play 60 minutes of brutal, high-impact collision football on zero sleep.
Then, they loaded him onto a pressurized, 8-hour transatlantic flight back to Philadelphia.
Every doctor on the planet knows that long-haul flights and cabin pressure are the exact triggers that cause lower-extremity blood clots to break free. The Eagles spent days assuring the public it was just a "minor, superficial calf clot".
Now the truth comes out: the clot dislodged, shot through his bloodstream, and caused multiple pulmonary emboli in his lungs.
Hurts is officially out for the season, placed on blood thinners where taking a single routine tackle could cause a fatal internal hemorrhage.
He isn't just lucky to play football again, he is lucky to be alive.
When the NFL preaches "player safety," remember this moment. They ran a human being into the ground for television ratings in the UK, almost lost him to a preventable medical catastrophe, and cratered their entire season in the process.
Who inside that building signed off on letting him play and board that flight?
Bart Fox retweeted
llhan Omar’s family didn’t flee Somalia as the oppressed. They fled because her father, Nur Omar Mohamed, was a senior colonel in the Somali National Army of the genocidal communist dictator Mohamed Siad Barre, the regime that systematically
s|aughtered up to 200,000 people, mostly Isaaq civilians, in one of the worst genocides in modern African history.
Her father was an esteemed senior officer who commanded a regiment, trained in the Soviet Union, and stayed in the military hierarchy of that brutal Marxist-Leninist dictatorship for years.
When the regime finally collapsed under the weight of its own mass m*rder, famine, and civil war in 1991, the family ran, not as victims of the dictatorship, but as people tied to the apparatus that had just spent years bombing cities, executing civilians, and turning northern Somalia into a ki||ing field.
Now... this same family is in the US, where Omar stands up and lectures Americans about justice, accountability, morality, and “genocide.”
This hypocrisy is sickening.
A daughter of a colonel from the regime that carried out the Isaaq genocide has the gall to moralize to the country that took her in after her father’s side lost power.
Her father came to the U.S. as a “refugee,” just like Yusuf Abdi Ali, who was accused of war crimes and later found liable for torture in a U.S. civil court.
Yet, as far as publicly available information shows, her father never faced comparable scrutiny or accountability.
Ali was deported from the US only two years ago, after a survivor pursued justice through the courts. It took a survivor’s determination to bring his abuses before a judge and jury. Consider that...
Also, compare this CNN investigative piece to the propaganda, lies, out of context, theatrical drama show they spew today.
Big difference.
This democrat party is not your grandmother's democrat party... nor is this mainstream media your mother's media.
Bart Fox retweeted
This may be the most corrupt thing I’ve ever heard in my life
A Democrat federal judge made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers since the 80’s. Democrats have been renewing the injunction every 5 years. This only ended in 2020
READ THAT AGAIN
“Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections.
And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines.
And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process.
And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction.
So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places.
What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.”
Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats
Bart Fox retweeted
INSANE 🚨 Assistant US Attorney General for the National Fraud Enforcement Division says fraudsters are stealing so much money every year in America, it’s more than the entire budget of the Departments of Energy, Justice Department and Department of Interior COMBINED
Nobody in America should be paying an income tax
For reference this is roughly $105 billion dollars+ stolen by fraudsters EVERY YEAR
Bart Fox retweeted
My dear American friends, today I'm going to take apart the two most successful salesmen of economic snake oil of our time: Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zucman.
If you read my last post, you know where this comes from. Gramsci told his heirs not to storm the palace but to capture the institutions: schools, universities, media, culture. I showed you how France became the laboratory. Today I want to show you the field where that strategy worked best of all. Economics.
Here's why. In physics, if your theory is wrong, the bridge falls down. In engineering, the rocket explodes. Reality grades your work. In the social sciences, reality grades slowly, and nobody loses their job when the prediction fails. You pick your data, you pick your assumptions, you build a model, and the conclusion you wanted at the start comes out at the end with a lot of equations attached. That's the perfect terrain for a war of position. You don't need to be right. You need to be cited.
Meet the two generals.
Thomas Piketty wrote Capital in the Twenty-First Century. It sold millions of copies and became the most celebrated economics book of the decade. Gabriel Zucman, his former student, wrote The Triumph of Injustice with Emmanuel Saez and helped design the wealth taxes that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders campaigned on. This is not a French problem. Their ideas are already inside your Democratic Party.
Now let's go through their theses one by one.
Thesis one: "r > g." Piketty's famous formula says the return on capital grows faster than the economy, so wealth inevitably concentrates in the hands of a few dynasties, and capitalism slides back to the aristocracy of the 19th century.
Look at the list of the richest Americans today. Elon Musk. Jeff Bezos. Jensen Huang. Mark Zuckerberg. Larry Page. First-generation builders. Not heirs. Most of the names on the first Forbes 400 list in 1982 have since fallen off it. Fortunes don't compound forever. They get split between children, spent, mismanaged, and overtaken by people who build something new. And when an MIT graduate student, Matthew Rognlie, looked closely at Piketty's own numbers, he found that the rise in capital's share of income came almost entirely from housing. Not factories. Not shareholders. Real estate, which is a story about building restrictions, not about capitalism. The law of history turned out to be a law of zoning.
Thesis two: "Inequality in America has exploded." Piketty, Saez and Zucman built the charts every journalist uses. Top 1% capturing everything, the middle class crushed.
Then two economists at the US Treasury and the Joint Committee on Taxation, Gerald Auten and David Splinter, redid the work. They counted what the famous charts left out or treated differently: taxes paid, government transfers, retirement income, changes in how people file. Their result: after taxes and transfers, the top 1%'s share of income has barely moved since the 1960s. Same country, same tax data, a completely different story. The difference isn't reality. It's the assumptions. And Piketty's data was already in trouble in 2014, when the Financial Times published an investigation pointing out errors and unexplained adjustments in his spreadsheets.
Thesis three: "Billionaires pay a lower tax rate than the working class." This was the headline of Saez and Zucman's book, and it went viral. The 400 richest Americans supposedly paid less than the bottom half.
To get there, they made choices that critics across the spectrum, including Larry Summers, Obama's own former Treasury Secretary, challenged: how corporate taxes are assigned, how refundable credits that put money into lower-income households' pockets are counted. Meanwhile, the IRS's own numbers say the top 1% of earners pay more than 40% of all federal income taxes. A viral claim is not a fact. It's a campaign slogan with footnotes.
Thesis four: "A small wealth tax on the ultra-rich will fund everything." In France, Zucman's proposal became the left's flagship measure: a 2% minimum tax every year on fortunes over €100 million.
Here's what they never explain. The fortunes of builders are not piles of cash. They are shares in the companies they built. Imagine a founder whose startup is valued at a billion euros but doesn't make a profit yet. To pay a 2% tax on paper wealth, every year, he has to sell pieces of his company. Year after year, he loses control, and the buyers are usually foreign funds. Congratulations, you just exported your best companies.
And we know what happens next, because it already happened. In 1990, twelve OECD countries had a wealth tax. By 2017, only four did. Nearly all of them repealed it, because it raised little and chased away capital. Norway raised its wealth tax in 2022 and dozens of its richest people moved to Switzerland. France ran the experiment for decades before abolishing most of its wealth tax in 2018. Their policy has been tested. It failed every time.
Thesis five: and here they stop pretending. In his next book, Capital and Ideology, Piketty proposes what he openly calls "participatory socialism." Taxes on the largest fortunes up to 90%. Property that is no longer permanent, but "temporary," returned to the collective at regular intervals. He's not hiding anything. The goal isn't to fix capitalism. It's to end private ownership of anything big enough to matter.
So why are they celebrated? Why do they have the prizes, the chairs, the front pages, the invitations to Davos? Zucman even won the John Bates Clark Medal in 2023, one of the most prestigious awards in economics.
That's not a refutation of what I'm telling you. That's the proof of it. That's what it looks like when Gramsci's long march reaches the economics departments. The institutions give each other medals, the media quote the medals, and the politicians quote the media. Nobody ever checks whether the predictions came true.
So stop calling them neutral economists. They are activists with PhDs. Their work starts from a conclusion, that private wealth is illegitimate, and builds the data to justify it.
And understand where that conclusion leads. I'm not saying Piketty or Zucman want camps. I'm saying every regime that tried to abolish large private property ended in poverty, and the worst of them ended in prisons and mass graves. The intellectuals who cheered Lenin didn't want gulags either. Many of them ended up in one. Good intentions have never been a firewall.
Next time someone quotes Piketty or Zucman at you, don't get angry. Ask questions. Who are the richest people today, heirs or builders? Why did almost every country that tried a wealth tax repeal it? Why do two teams using the same tax data reach opposite conclusions? What does Piketty mean by temporary property?
You don't need to win the argument. You just need to make them check.
I come from your future. We gave these men our universities, our newspapers and our budget debates. Don't give them yours.
My dear American friends, in my last two posts I showed you where France stands and how our economy got there. Today I want to go deeper, because the economics were only the symptom.
Here is my message to every American: you have been infected by a virus that took decades to incubate in your country. Everything you've watched get worse, year after year, is the damage. MAGA, whatever you think of it, is the immune response. But a body can't fight what it can't name. So today I'm going to name it and show you where it came from.
It starts in an Italian prison cell.
Antonio Gramsci co-founded the Italian Communist Party in 1921. In 1926 Mussolini locked him up, and he spent the rest of his life in prison filling notebooks. He was trying to answer one question: why did the revolution never come to the West? Marx had promised the workers would rise. They didn't. They went to church, saluted the flag, and wanted their kids to do better than them.
Gramsci's answer changed everything. In the West, he said, power doesn't sit in the army or the factories. It sits in culture: schools, universities, churches, newspapers, theater, the family. He called it hegemony. As long as ordinary people believe in their own civilization, you can't overthrow it. So you don't storm the palace. You fight a "war of position." You take the institutions one by one, patiently, until the culture thinks like you do. Then political power falls into your hands like ripe fruit.
A German student leader, Rudi Dutschke, later gave the strategy its famous name: the long march through the institutions.
Now watch France become the laboratory.
In 1945 the French Communist Party came out of the Resistance as the biggest party in the country, with more than a quarter of the vote. General de Gaulle needed them to govern, so communists entered the cabinet. Look at what they got. Public Health went to a communist, François Billoux. Labor went to a communist, Ambroise Croizat, who built our national social security system and put it under boards dominated by the communist-led CGT union. Industrial Production went to another communist, Marcel Paul, who nationalized electricity and gas and gave the union control of their enormous social funds. Education was redesigned by a commission led by two communist intellectuals, Paul Langevin and Henri Wallon, whose plan became the bible of French school reformers for decades.
The communists were thrown out of government in 1947. It didn't matter. They kept exactly what Gramsci told them to keep: the unions, the schools, the universities, publishing, film, theater. For a generation, being a French intellectual and being on the far left were almost the same thing. Jean-Paul Sartre, the most famous thinker in the world, defended the Soviet Union while it was filling the gulags.
Then came May 1968. Students occupied the Sorbonne, millions of workers went on strike, and for a few weeks the country stopped. De Gaulle won the elections that followed in a landslide. He won the ballot box. He lost the culture. Within a year he was gone, and the generation of 68 spent the next fifty years climbing to the top of every French institution: media, ministries, courts, schools, publishing houses. Their slogan was "It is forbidden to forbid." Authority, tradition, family, nation: all of it became suspect.
Then came the export phase. This is where you come in.
A group of French philosophers, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze, Jean-François Lyotard, gave the movement its intellectual weapons. Foucault taught that every institution, every norm, every piece of knowledge is a disguised structure of power. Derrida taught that every text, every concept, every hierarchy can be "deconstructed" until nothing stable is left. Lyotard announced the end of grand narratives, which in practice meant the end of the great narrative of the West itself.
In France these men were famous. In America they became gods. Starting with a 1966 conference at Johns Hopkins where Derrida made his American debut, your English, history and law departments imported them wholesale. Your academics even gave it a name: French Theory. On your campuses it mutated. Mixed with the Frankfurt School exiles like Herbert Marcuse, who argued that tolerance should be withdrawn from the right, it produced critical race theory, gender theory, intersectionality. The old Marxist split between bourgeois and proletarian was replaced by a new one: oppressor and oppressed, assigned by skin color, sex and identity.
That's the cultural strain of the virus. There's a second strain, and it attacked your energy and your ambition.
In 1968 an Italian industrialist, Aurelio Peccei, co-founded the Club of Rome. In 1972 it published The Limits to Growth, built on a computer model from MIT, warning that if humanity kept growing, civilization would collapse. It sold millions of copies. Its core idea, that growth itself is the problem, became gospel. In France it gave birth to the degrowth movement. Progress went from a promise to a sin.
Look what it did to us. The country that built a nuclear fleet in fifteen years shut down Superphénix, its advanced breeder reactor, in 1997, as part of a deal with the Greens. In 2015 it passed a law to cut nuclear's share of our electricity. In 2019 it cancelled ASTRID, our next-generation reactor program. In 2020 it closed Fessenheim, a working plant. We sabotaged our own greatest achievement because we were told that building things was dangerous.
Put the two strains together and you get what you call woke. One teaches children to be ashamed of their past. The other teaches them to fear their future. Guilt behind, fear ahead. A civilization that hates where it comes from and dreads where it's going has nowhere left to go.
And here's the irony. France infected America, and now America is sending it back to us. Our own politicians complain about "American woke ideas" invading French universities, without realizing those ideas were born in Paris. The virus made a round trip and came home stronger.
That's why France is the most advanced case in the West. We have every symptom at once: a state that runs health, schools, culture and energy. Unions that block every reform. Universities where you can't say what everyone thinks. Self-hatred. Fear of growth. We are what the disease looks like when nothing fights it.
The West is at a turning point. Every country is infected, some more than others. What you're living through, the fights over schools, over speech, over energy, over what it means to be American, is the fever. The fever is not the disease. The fever is your body fighting back.
So understand this. The battle in front of you isn't just Republican versus Democrat. It's a battle for the institutions Gramsci told his heirs to capture: schools, universities, media, culture. It took them eighty years to win them. You won't take them back in one election.
But you can take them back. You have something we never had: a country founded on the idea that the individual comes before the state. Free speech written into your First Amendment. Builders who still believe the future can be better than the past.
Name the virus. Fight it where it lives. Don't let it do to you what it did to us.
I come from your future. It's not too late to change yours.
Bart Fox retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
Bart Fox retweeted
My post about France went viral. Thousands of likes. Many Americans told me: "Democrats aren't socialists. America will never be France." I want to answer that seriously, step by step.
Start with a simple observation. Look at what has gotten cheaper in America over the last 25 years: TVs, phones, software, clothes, toys. Now look at what has exploded: college tuition, healthcare, childcare, housing.
What separates the two lists? The first lives in competitive markets. The second is exactly where government is most involved: subsidies, mandates, licensing, zoning, regulation.
College. Washington lends students almost unlimited money. Universities know the money will always come, so they raise tuition and hire more administrators. The student pays the bill for twenty years. More government money, higher prices.
Housing. Why can't a nurse buy a home in the city where she works? Not because of capitalism. Because of zoning laws, permits, environmental reviews, years of procedure to build a single building. The most expensive places to live in America are the places where it's hardest to build. When building is nearly illegal, prices explode.
Healthcare. The patient almost never sees the price. A third party pays, regulations limit who can compete, and costs climb year after year with no one able to say no.
So here is the trap. The problems you suffer from are not the failure of free markets. They are the places where the market has already been replaced by the state. And the solution you're being offered is more of the same.
That's the Trojan horse. It always works the same way. A real problem. A generous-sounding promise. A program that makes things worse. Then the failure of that program becomes the argument for the next one. People who lived under communism in Poland learned to recognize the lie and the mask the lie wears. The lie never presents itself as a lie. It presents itself as compassion.
In France we are at the end of that road. Debt we can never repay. Young people who can't afford a home. Our best people leaving. And every few years our cities burn. Nobody voted for this. They voted for one more generous promise, fifty years in a row.
If you're a Republican, share this with the Democrat in your life. Not to win an argument. To start a conversation.
If you're a Democrat, I'm not asking you to switch teams. I'm asking you to look at the pattern. Wherever the state took over, life became unaffordable. Don't fix the failures of government with more government.
Stay American. Ask for less state, not more.
I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you.
I come from your future.
In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation, high taxes on the rich, a state that takes care of everything. Public spending close to 57% of GDP, one of the highest on the planet. On paper, it’s the dream.
Here’s what it looks like from the inside. France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974. Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros. Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget. Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding. Our schools rank lower every year. Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in. Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco. And the rich you wanted to tax? They left too, and took the jobs with them.
The promise was protection. The result is stagnation.
The worst part is that nobody in France voted for decline. Every single step sounded generous, compassionate, reasonable. One more program. One more regulation. One more tax to fund it. Each step alone makes sense. Fifty years of them, and you wake up in a country that can no longer build a nuclear plant on time or keep its streets safe.
I love America because it’s the one place on earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing. I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid and it changed my life. That spirit is the most precious thing your country has.
Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France?
Trust me. You don’t want to be France.
Bart Fox retweeted
I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you.
I come from your future.
In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation, high taxes on the rich, a state that takes care of everything. Public spending close to 57% of GDP, one of the highest on the planet. On paper, it’s the dream.
Here’s what it looks like from the inside. France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974. Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros. Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget. Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding. Our schools rank lower every year. Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in. Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco. And the rich you wanted to tax? They left too, and took the jobs with them.
The promise was protection. The result is stagnation.
The worst part is that nobody in France voted for decline. Every single step sounded generous, compassionate, reasonable. One more program. One more regulation. One more tax to fund it. Each step alone makes sense. Fifty years of them, and you wake up in a country that can no longer build a nuclear plant on time or keep its streets safe.
I love America because it’s the one place on earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing. I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid and it changed my life. That spirit is the most precious thing your country has.
Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France?
Trust me. You don’t want to be France.
Je n'ai jamais été aussi optimiste. Pas malgré le chaos actuel, mais grâce à lui.
Je vais vous expliquer pourquoi l'empire du mensonge construit par la gauche depuis cinquante ans va s'effondrer, et pourquoi ce n'est pas une opinion mais une question de physique.
Tout commence avec un mouvement né sur X il y a quelques années : l'effective accelerationism, ou e/acc.
Au départ, c'est une idée presque thermodynamique. L'univers a une tendance de fond : la matière s'organise pour capter et dissiper l'énergie de plus en plus efficacement. Une cellule fait ça. Une forêt fait ça. Une civilisation fait ça. Le marché, la technologie et le capital sont les formes les plus avancées de ce processus. Ce sont des machines à transformer l'énergie en intelligence, en abondance, en complexité.
La thèse e/acc est simple : il ne faut pas freiner cette dynamique, il faut l'embrasser. Plus d'énergie, plus de calcul, plus d'innovation, plus de croissance. Monter sur l'échelle de Kardashev au lieu de s'excuser d'exister. En face, il y a les « décels » : ceux qui veulent ralentir, réguler, taxer, interdire, culpabiliser. Ceux qui voient le progrès comme une menace à contenir plutôt qu'une force à libérer.
Mais il y a une dimension de l'accélération dont presque personne ne parle. L'accélération n'est pas seulement un moteur. C'est un filtre.
Pensez à n'importe quel organisme. Un corps humain en bonne santé peut courir. Il accélère, son cœur pompe plus fort, ses muscles consomment plus d'oxygène, et tout fonctionne parce que le système est bien conçu. Maintenant, prenez un corps malade. Des artères bouchées, un cœur fragile, des organes qui ne communiquent plus entre eux. Faites-le courir. Il ne va pas plus vite vers la santé. Il va plus vite vers l'infarctus.
L'accélération ne corrige pas les défauts d'un système. Elle les amplifie. Un système sain qui accélère devient plus fort. Un système dysfonctionnel qui accélère meurt plus vite.
Et c'est exactement ce qui est en train d'arriver au projet que je vais appeler par son nom : le projet globalo-socialiste. Celui porté par les démocrates américains, par la technostructure de Bruxelles, par les entités supranationales qui n'ont de comptes à rendre à personne, par un réseau d'ONG financées par l'argent public pour dicter la morale aux peuples qui les financent.
Regardez ce que ce projet a produit.
Des États obèses qui prélèvent plus de la moitié de la richesse produite et qui délivrent des services publics de plus en plus dégradés. Des écoles qui n'apprennent plus à lire mais qui apprennent à culpabiliser. Des hôpitaux à bout de souffle malgré des budgets records. Une immigration massive sans aucune exigence d'assimilation, présentée comme une chance par ceux qui n'en subissent jamais les conséquences. Une désindustrialisation organisée au nom d'une écologie punitive qui délocalise la pollution en Chine et l'emploi avec. Des normes, des normes, et encore des normes, jusqu'à ce qu'il devienne plus simple de créer une entreprise à Austin qu'à Lyon. Une justice qui excuse le coupable et soupçonne la victime. Une censure qui avance masquée sous le nom de « lutte contre la désinformation ». Et une jeunesse à qui l'on a expliqué que son pays, son histoire et sa civilisation étaient des crimes à expier.
Ce n'est pas un ensemble de bugs. C'est la conception elle-même.
Maintenant, changeons d'image. Voyez ce système comme un moteur.
Un bon moteur, c'est de la précision. Des pièces qui s'emboîtent, un minimum de frottements, une énergie qui se transforme en mouvement. Le marché libre, la propriété, la responsabilité individuelle, la monnaie saine : c'est ça, un moteur bien conçu. L'information circule par les prix, chaque erreur est sanctionnée, chaque bonne idée est récompensée.
Le moteur socialiste, lui, est mal conçu dès le départ. Il ne tourne pas sur la création de valeur mais sur sa redistribution. Il ne récompense pas la performance, il la taxe. Il ne laisse pas les erreurs mourir, il les subventionne. Résultat : ça frotte partout. Ça chauffe. Ça grince. Chaque pièce use la pièce d'à côté.
Et que font ceux qui pilotent ce moteur ? Au lieu de le reconcevoir, ils changent les pièces. En permanence. Une pièce cède, on en remet une neuve. Encore une. Encore une.
Ces pièces de rechange, vous les connaissez. Elles s'appellent la dette publique et la planche à billets.
La France a dépassé les 3 300 milliards d'euros de dette et n'a pas voté un budget à l'équilibre depuis le milieu des années 70. Les États-Unis ont franchi les 37 000 milliards de dollars. Les banques centrales ont maintenu des taux à zéro pendant des années, imprimé des montants que plus personne ne sait se représenter, et quand l'inflation est arrivée, elles ont fait semblant d'être surprises. Milton Friedman l'avait pourtant dit il y a cinquante ans : l'inflation est toujours et partout un phénomène monétaire.
Chaque crise, on rachète du temps avec de l'argent qui n'existe pas. Chaque problème structurel, on l'arrose de liquidités pour masquer le bruit du moteur. Mais les frottements sont toujours là. Ils s'accumulent. Et la facture des pièces de rechange finit par coûter plus cher que le moteur lui-même : la charge de la dette devient l'un des premiers postes de dépense de l'État français.
Pendant des décennies, ce moteur mal conçu a pu tourner à 3 000 tours par minute. Lentement. Bruyamment. Mais il tournait. Le monde allait assez doucement pour que le bricolage permanent suffise à masquer l'absurdité de la conception.
Et puis l'IA est arrivée.
L'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'accélération la plus brutale de l'histoire humaine. Ce qui prenait des années prend des mois. Ce qui prenait des mois prend des jours. Des entreprises de dix personnes font ce que faisaient des entreprises de mille. Le capital, les talents et les idées se déplacent à la vitesse de la lumière vers les endroits où ils sont bien traités.
L'IA vient de faire passer le moteur de 3 000 à 20 000 tours par minute.
Posez-vous la question qu'un ingénieur se poserait. Que se passe-t-il quand on fait monter à 20 000 tours un moteur mal conçu, rafistolé de partout, qui frotte à chaque rotation ?
Il explose.
Pas parce que quelqu'un l'a saboté. Parce que la physique ne négocie pas.
Et c'est exactement ce que nous voyons en ce moment, sous nos yeux.
L'insécurité qui gagne des villes entières qui étaient paisibles il y a vingt ans. Le conflit de Gaza importé dans nos rues et instrumentalisé par une gauche qui a troqué l'ouvrier contre le clientélisme communautaire. La misère qui revient dans un pays qui a pourtant un des taux de dépense publique les plus élevés au monde. Des classes moyennes qui travaillent et n'arrivent plus à se loger. Une France fracturée, où l'on parle désormais à voix haute de risque de guerre civile.
Ce ne sont pas des accidents. Ce ne sont pas des « crises » successives sans lien entre elles. Ce sont les pièces du moteur qui commencent à voler.
C'est la conséquence logique de cinquante ans de socialisme international : un système qui a détruit la responsabilité, la frontière, la monnaie, l'école et la fierté, et qui découvre qu'à haute vitesse, tout ce qui a été détruit ne peut plus être compensé par une ligne de dette supplémentaire.
Et c'est là que je deviens profondément optimiste.
Parce qu'une fois qu'on a compris ça, on comprend aussi que leur projet a une date de fin. Pas une date politique. Une date physique. Un système qui consomme plus qu'il ne produit, qui punit ceux qui créent et récompense ceux qui détruisent, qui finance son présent en hypothéquant l'avenir de ses enfants, ne peut pas durer indéfiniment. Il n'est pas soutenable par construction. L'IA ne fait qu'avancer l'échéance.
Le mensonge a besoin de lenteur pour survivre. Il a besoin que les conséquences arrivent assez tard pour qu'on puisse accuser quelqu'un d'autre. Dans un monde à 20 000 tours, les conséquences arrivent immédiatement. Le mensonge n'a plus le temps de se cacher.
Alors, que faire quand le moteur explose ? On en construit un nouveau. Et cette fois, on le conçoit correctement.
Écoutez Elon Musk. Un homme qui a reconstruit l'industrie spatiale, la voiture électrique et l'infrastructure satellite en partant d'un principe simple : revenir aux premiers principes. Ne pas demander « comment on a toujours fait », mais « qu'est-ce qui est physiquement vrai ». C'est exactement ce dont nos États ont besoin : arrêter de rafistoler et repartir de la base.
Écoutez Javier Milei. Un homme dont tout le monde se moquait, arrivé à la tête d'un pays ravagé par un siècle de péronisme, et qui a pris la tronçonneuse au sens propre. Ministères supprimés, dépenses coupées, inflation écrasée, excédent budgétaire retrouvé. Il a prouvé une chose que la gauche jurait impossible : on peut démonter le moteur socialiste et le peuple peut le soutenir.
Écoutez Milton Friedman. Relisez-le. Tout était déjà là. La monnaie, la liberté de choisir, la responsabilité, les effets pervers de l'intervention publique. Il disait que si l'on confiait le Sahara au gouvernement fédéral, il y aurait pénurie de sable en cinq ans. On a ri. On a confié le sable. On a eu la pénurie.
Revenez à une hiérarchie et au respect du beau. Une civilisation ne tient pas que sur des chiffres. Elle tient sur l'idée qu'il existe des choses supérieures à d'autres. Que l'excellence vaut mieux que la médiocrité. Que le mérite compte. Qu'une cathédrale est plus belle qu'un parking. Que transmettre est un devoir et pas une oppression. Le relativisme a été l'arme culturelle de ce projet. Le retour du beau, du vrai et de l'exigence en sera l'antidote.
Et enfin, faites le Nuremberg du communisme. Le nazisme a été jugé, documenté, enseigné, et il est devenu moralement indéfendable. Le communisme, avec ses dizaines de millions de morts, ses goulags, ses famines organisées et ses peuples réduits en esclavage, n'a jamais eu ce procès. On peut encore porter un t-shirt du Che dans une université sans que personne ne cille. Tant que ce procès historique et moral n'aura pas eu lieu, l'idéologie continuera de muter et de revenir sous de nouveaux noms. Il faut nommer les crimes, les enseigner, honorer les victimes, et rendre cette idéologie aussi infréquentable que celle qu'elle prétendait combattre.
Le monde qui vient sera plus rapide, plus exigeant et plus impitoyable avec les systèmes mal conçus. C'est une terrible nouvelle pour ceux qui ont vécu du mensonge.
Et c'est la meilleure nouvelle de notre génération pour tous ceux qui veulent construire.
Le moteur va exploser. À nous de dessiner le suivant.
Bart Fox retweeted
1) Just got back from my son’s career fair at his school. When he asked if they held any unpaid internships that he could apply to for some experience, he was told by 3 out of the first 4 people we spoke to, they don’t accept applications from “people like him” as they only ….
Bart Fox retweeted
Americans who identify as gay are FINALLY starting to wake up to Islam
“I'm a gay guy that lives in Michigan that's reading the Quran, and the reason I'm reading this is because I've been called Islamophobic by people in the gay community because I've expressed genuine concern over the state of how gays and women are treated in Islamic-dominated countries.
I genuinely do not understand how somebody could look at a place that's Muslim-dominated and say that they want that here, especially as a gay man. It makes no sense.
It's not like a hatred thing. It's not like a political argument. It's like those are not conditions that would be conducive to the way that I want to live my life here.
— you should not and cannot use that to infringe on my right to be who I am, as long as we're not being violent towards each other, right? So that's what America is all about, and a great country. Like, we're very, very lucky to be here.
So I just don't get what the gays are thinking. They're literally they've lost it. They have lost it — they're like actually mentally ill. This is like a mental illness at this point that these gays are so in support of something that's so obviously bad for them. I cannot understand”
FINALLY gay people are starting to realize there is a problem with Islam. Here is a list of Muslim countries you can be killed or beaten for being gay
- Iran: Death penalty under the Islamic Penal Code for male same-sex penetrative acts
- Saudi Arabia: Death penalty
- Yemen: Death by stoning
- Afghanistan: Death penalty
- Brunei: Death by stoning under the Syariah Penal Code for male same-sex acts
- Mauritania: Death by public stoning
- Nigeria (northern states): Death penalty
- Qatar: Death penalty possible under Sharia for Muslims
- United Arab Emirates: Death penalty possible under Sharia
- Somalia: Death penalty possible under Sharia
- Pakistan: Death penalty technically possible under Sharia
Other Muslim-majority or Sharia-influenced countries with criminal penalties such as imprisonment, flogging and more
Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Gambia, Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Oman, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and more with punishments that include years to life in prison with flogging and fines
Indonesia gays get public flogging under local Sharia
This is that the Democrat Party is importing into America
























