
Serial entrepreneur who loves living on the edge of technology. @dualmintrwa Co-Founder, CEO & CTO. prev @oracle
Central District, Asia/Hong_Ko
Joined February 2008
- Tweets2.7K
- Following950
- Followers593
- Likes1.2K
m0 ran $61b through tokenized dollars since june 2024. 20+ products on the rails. this week at money20/20 the next leg is securities, opening US markets globally.
everyone wants to tokenize the tail. m0 built the boring base first. you can't settle a bond on rails nobody uses.
i see the same in machine underwriting. a washer's price tag is the least interesting thing about it. months of clearing payments are what make it collateral.
the 2022 vintage is 20-30% ahead of the 2021 vintage at the same stage. same asset class, and in plenty of cases the very same companies.
the variable was entry price. 2021 funds bought into peak pricing: seed medians near $12m pre-money, series a near $42m, series b near $90m. 2022 deployed at 40-60% discounts to those peaks.
at a $90m pre-money you need a $270m+ exit just to triple the check, before fees. the fund that bought the same company cheaper needs a lot less than that to look smart.
i price machines for a living so maybe i over-index here. but the day we agree on a price is the day the lease is decided. everything after that is a payment schedule.
read a good breakdown this week on why equipment finance underwriting hasn't scaled despite way more data and better apis. the actual bottleneck is classification. every bank deposit needs someone to decide if it's revenue, a transfer, or the owner moving cash around. average file takes 4 to 8 hours just reading statements.
a machine doesn't have that problem. a washer cycle ran or it didn't. a compressor was on or it wasn't. nothing to interpret.
we underwrite off the machine instead of the bank statement, skip the classification step entirely. a year into doing it this way and the default numbers still hold. not what i expected going in.
ifpi's 2026 global music report: physical revenue (vinyl, cd) grew faster than digital last year. only the second time that's happened since they started tracking it.
i always figured physical was nostalgia money, propping up a format that should've died with the cd player in your car. streaming has zero marginal cost and an infinite catalog, it should win every comparison.
but some slice of listeners wants the opposite of infinite. something that takes up a shelf, something you own instead of rent access to. not a huge slice. just enough to bend a thirty billion dollar market's growth curve for a year.
chainlink's price feeds just went live on stellar, which already carries $3.5b+ in tokenized funds (spiko, ondo, franklin templeton's benji).
ccip, chainlink's actual cross-chain transfer protocol, has only moved $322m of this year's $39b rwa market. 0.8%.
pricing an asset onchain turned out to be the easy part. moving it between chains is still mostly unsolved.
we hit the same wall with machines. a laundromat's cycle count streams in real time. nobody's built the rails to act on it across operators yet.
the ifr's 2026 world robotics report: 7,000 humanoid robots sold last year for industrial and professional use. roughly 500,000 industrial robots installed that same year. 5 million robots now operating in factories worldwide.
humanoids are 1.4% of the new units and basically all of the headlines.
kumar sokka, who used to run automation at rockwell, said it plainly: "the humanoid figure is the one everyone will quote, but on its own it's misleading. the machine workforce isn't coming. it's been here for years, and it doesn't look like a humanoid."
i get the appeal of the humanoid story, two arms and a head reads as progress in a way a welding cell never will. but i've sold and financed machines like that for years. they don't do demos, they run three shifts and pay for themselves inside two years.
the number that actually matters here isn't 7,000. it's the 500,000 nobody's tweeting about.
had a robotics operator tell me: they landed the fleet contract, then realized the money raised to build the robot was the money they needed to deploy it.
so we just buy the machine outright now. zero capex on their side, they keep most of the subscription, own it at the end.
dtcc turned on its tokenization service this month. $30 trillion of eligible securities, starting with 25 russell 1000 names, big etfs, treasuries. same cusips, 24/7 wallet to wallet transfer. basically the second dematerialization of us stock ownership since book-entry replaced paper certificates in 1973.
i had a laundromat deal stall three weeks last spring because an appraiser needed to physically look at four washers. they were running the whole time, turning four loads an hour, telling anyone who asked exactly what they were worth. nobody asked the machines.
davidovich fokina lost his first five tour finals. monte carlo 2022 was one of them.
sunday in shanghai he was down a set and a break to a 20 year old who'd just beaten medvedev in the semis. clawed back 1-6, 7-6, 6-4 for his first masters 1000 title. sixth final of his career.
reminds me of raising my second company. first four term sheets fell through after the handshake. fifth one i almost didn't take the meeting for, figured it'd go the same way. it didn't.
a robotics founder i know spent half his seed round deploying the first ten units.
dualmint buys the machine instead, zero capex, and he keeps most of the subscription until he owns it outright.
the lender still wants tax returns. the robot already streams its own uptime.
spent monday on a laundromat deal, 12 machines running 4.6 turns a day. bank wanted two years of tax returns before touching the dryer replacement.
the machine already told me more than the tax returns would. turns per day, cycle time, revenue per slot. that's the whole credit file, if anyone bothered reading it.
still catches me off guard how much underwriting ignores the thing sitting right in front of it.
zverev clinched year-end #1 this week without hitting a ball himself. sinner's hurt, then bergs (ranked 39) beat alcaraz in shanghai, and that was the whole thing. decided from the sidelines.
i've been in deals that turned on a competitor's bad quarter instead of anything we did. feels different than winning. still counts the same on the board.
checked the rankings three times today anyway.
spent an hour in the phonorecords v filings this week. four of five streaming services want the same deal: freeze the songwriter rate for another five years. amazon's the outlier, pushing for a cut to 13.4%. publishers want up to 20% of revenue.
labels negotiate in a free market. songwriters get whatever a federal board decides every five years, then live with it until the next hearing.
spotify already found the way around that board: direct deals with universal, warner, sony, bmg. the biggest publishers get a market. everyone else waits for 2027.
seed rounds hit a record $24m median post-money this year.
the number that matters more: seed to series a graduation dropped to 38%, from over 50% back in 2021. ai deals are 87.5% of all venture dollars now.
bigger checks didn't buy better odds, they raised the bar at the next round for anyone not shipping an ai wrapper.
raised dualmint's seed at a fraction of that $24m number. felt like a disadvantage then. feels like less to live up to now.
talked to a robotics operator last month with $150k of inventory in a warehouse. deploying it would've drained the capital he raised to build it.
now we buy the units outright. he pays zero upfront, keeps most of the subscription, owns the robot at the end of the lease.