Basically this

Use px0 once, and you will find every other IDE sluggish :) There is no going back once you taste speed. px0.ai

Google researcher @lauriewired warns the shift from C++ to Python in universities is creating programmers who don't understand how computers actually work: "When I was in college getting my CS degree, my year was one of the last years that was using C++ as the core language for teaching students. Actually they were switching over to Python of all languages." "One of the biggest issues that I have is that a lot of these higher level languages are really abstracting away what is happening under the hood. If you're not aware of how the computers work in general, then you're gonna have problems when it comes to debugging." "Starting with a language like C++ gives you the ability to do these really high level abstractions, but it also gives you the ability to customize your memory management and get really close to the underlying machine. Especially if you're trying to work in high performance computing, game development, or high frequency trading." "At C++ conferences, there's almost this fundamental anger response when it comes to mentioning something like C or C++. People start complaining about the complexity of it." @Google

Today I fully implemented std::unique_ptr from scratch. When I was done, I asked Claude Code to review my implementation. It was an amazing learning experience. I discovered so many subtle nuances I haven’t thought about.

Will AI write +90% of all code this year? Anders Hejlsberg (Creator of Typescript, C#): "For certain classes of apps that might be like all of I coded apps are writing 100% of the code. And there's an awful lot of that being written. Are they going to write 90% of the high quality code on the Internet? I don't know about that. I know that AI could not write our compiler, the Typescript compiler. It just can't. We've tried it can't do it. And I'm not asking it to either. I'm not saying it's not impressive. It's wildly impressive what it can do, But I just think there's a long way still to it's doing all of it. And I don't know that we ever get there. I hope we don't. Because then what's the point of humans anymore?" For the full conversation, you can search Ander's name on my YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcasts (link in bio)

Why Microsoft didn't have LLMs do their recent Typescript native rewrite in Go Anders Hejlsberg (Creator of Typescript): "If we just let AI loose on, what is it, half a million lines of code that we have in the old compiler? Well, I don't know that that would absolve us from then having go in and carefully examining every line that came out of it to make sure that there were no hallucinations. Right. Unless you have 100% perfect test coverage, you probably still gotta go check all of that. Now I think a better approach, quite honestly, would be enlist AI to write a program that helps you translate from TypeScript to go, because at that point you can park the stochastic ness in that program and then you can get deterministic behavior whenever you run the program, which means you get the same transformation every time you run it. Right. That's always the thing about AI that people forget it's not deterministic. Right. So you can't really trust that it's going to do the same thing twice. For the full conversation, you can search Anders Hejlsberg's name on my YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcasts (link in bio)

One secret to being an ultra-influential leader is to take 5 minutes to simulate your meetings every morning. For each meeting, visualize: how you want it to go, what role you will play in it, what could derail the meeting, how you want people to feel during & at the end of it.

It used to be the case that reviewing a contributor's PR was a form of "investment" in that contributor. They'd learn from your feedback, grow, take it into account for future contributions, etc. Unfortunately with agents I feel that's largely gone.