blocksec (@blocksec_xdc) profile picture

Here to dig into Globiance. Tracking user funds. Gathering information. DMs open. Email: [email protected].

Joined August 2025
Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)Photo by blocksec (@blocksec_xdc)
The following are two *preliminary* findings regarding the flow of @globiance's XDC. Much more work remains to be done. A conclusive, complete analysis will take time. This isn’t that. But it is a start. 1/n
13
42
13
146
35,266
Replying to @Frankixdc
All the platforms building on XDC are third party and do not get any support from XDC core team beyond technical support. Our job is only making sure we push the protocol and standards forward and keep improving them. We do not support/endorse any platform offering yields or promising returns. We do not give any investment advise. Community needs to assess and engage at their own risks, failing to do so can mean losing all funds. Everything is onchain and transparent to the level of every transaction hash and movement on the chain. I as founder only work on improving the protocol.
6
2
3
15
10,741
1) Globiance is obliged to return user funds in full, regardless of what Atul does to help. “Pausing” efforts to return user funds was disingenuous of them from the start. Nothing Atul does negates their legal obligations. 2) Contrary to their public announcements, to this day I’ve seen no credible (on chain) evidence that Globiance has returned any user funds. 3) In addition, by discouraging users who’ve (supposedly) received their funds from sharing TX hashes and by refusing to share TX hashes themselves so the community can independently verify their public claims, they are being doubly disingenuous. Globiance could easily share the public address of the wallet they’re using to return user funds - their refusal to do so (on manifestly absurd grounds), combined with the lack of users credibly claiming to have received their funds back, suggests that they have not returned any user funds. TL;DR Globiance continues to play games. Until they share the wallet address they’re using to return funds to users, I’d trust nothing they say. P.S. For our part, work on the legal structure is ongoing - this is a massive, tricky undertaking and, as I’ve said, it will take time to get everything in place. Nothing is over until the fat lady sings, but we’re doing our best.
19
20
6
88
19,385
For the record, this is false. To avoid confusion, please approach unreliable sources of information with a high dose of skepticism.
5
7
1
22
4,357
Another brief update here. We are now getting legal advice on the process before publishing the uptake form. Once that’s done, and the language/process is approved, we’ll be moving forward. As I said from the beginning, this is going to take time. Again, thanks for your patience.
6
15
8
58
15,840
Update on the Reimbursement Process: Phase 1. We have not yet been able to get Globiance to agree to share the required data. We will keep trying. That is of course unfortunate. Fortunately, however, @AndreCasterman, @B3lle888, and I have put a plan in place to begin to move forward without their help. We will be moving forward in phases, starting with Phase 1. Phase 1 will focus solely on victims who deposited XDC to Globiance and were unable to withdraw their funds. We will be sharing a Google Form shortly. You can expect to be asked to share (among other things) the addresses of the wallets you used you deposit XDC on Globiance, your Globiance deposit address, relevant TX hashes, as well as screenshots of your Globiance dashboard. Zoom meetings will subsequently be scheduled during which you’ll be asked to share your screen, login to Globiance’s platform, and show us the data we need to see. You’ll also be asked to confirm your identity, partly by displaying a government issued ID. If you can’t speak English, we will find suitable translators to help us communicate on the call. Once we have verified the claims of victims who lost XDC deposited to Globiance in Phase 1, we will (in later phases of the reimbursement process) try to find ways to accommodate and verify victims who deposited other assets (BTC, ETH, etc.) and purchased XDC on Globiance’s platform. Again, we will share the uptake form soon, which we hope Globiance will circulate to victims, so that nobody gets left behind. Thank you for your continued patience.
15
20
9
80
20,457
Update on the Reimbursement Process We’ll publish an uptake form for you to submit your reimbursement claim in the coming days. Each claim will be verified (among other things) against on-chain fund flows and the evidence you provide — including Globiance account balances, transaction history, and screenshots. We’ll also ask for your X (Twitter) handle and Telegram username. These are optional, but a history of posts about your Globiance losses can help validate claims. The reimbursement process will be overseen by me, @B3lle888, and @AndreCasterman. We may invite other trusted community members to assist in various ways. Please trust only updates from us, and beware of scammers pretending to represent this process. So far, Globiance appears willing to share some user data with us — but only if users give explicit permission. A consent form for that will therefore be included with the uptake form. That said, whether Globiance provides enough reliable data for us to validate claims is beyond our control. If Globiance cooperates fully, the process should run relatively smoothly. If not, some or even many cases may prove difficult to verify. Negotiations are ongoing, and we hope Globiance will provide the information needed to complete this effort properly. A few key points to bear in mind: Each claim must be independently verified. In some cases, we may reach out for additional information. We don’t yet know how many claims we’ll need to process — so please be patient. Once a claim is approved, it will be submitted to the XDC team, who will disburse funds from their reserves. There will be a vesting schedule for reimbursements. The specifics are still being finalized, but this step is economically necessary. For example, payouts might occur in tranches — such as one-third immediately, one-third after six months, and one-third after one year. The final schedule will depend on the number of claims and total XDC distributed. The percentage reimbursed (e.g., 100%, 90%, 75%) will likewise depend on total verified losses. Atul and Ritesh remain committed to doing everything possible to make victims whole, while also protecting the economic integrity of the ecosystem and its existing holders. Only XDC losses will be reimbursed (not BTC, ETH, etc.), and the staking rewards Globiance promised users will not be reimbursed. Finally, once claims are validated and disbursements begin, we’ll provide periodic public updates, including: • Total number of claims received • Number of claims verified • Total funds disbursed (with on-chain data) Thanks for your continued patience. Once we reach an agreement with Globiance on data sharing, we'll be able to begin the process.
16
42
7
88
22,379
Brief update on this. @B3lle888 and I are working on finalizing the process by which Globiance victims will be able to submit claims. In the meantime, victims should screenshot everything on their Globiance dashboard, including especially deposit/withdrawal addresses and transaction history, with TX hashes. We expect there will be many fraudulent claims filed, since this is the Internet, and we’re going to need to make sure only validated victims are reimbursed. Please stay tuned, and be patient as we work through this - this is a big job. 🙏
Enough is enough for everyones patience on globiance matter.. There should not be a blame game at each other. Lets fix this and make XDC community stronger and powerful I suggest all affected participants to form a working group with someone like @AndreCasterman @blocksec_xdc Belle? Anyone else who wants to lead in the working group?
10
23
5
63
20,991
🫡
Enough is enough for everyones patience on globiance matter.. There should not be a blame game at each other. Lets fix this and make XDC community stronger and powerful I suggest all affected participants to form a working group with someone like @AndreCasterman @blocksec_xdc Belle? Anyone else who wants to lead in the working group?
2
8
777
Yes just a comment on my post: I never received any data to run an analysis - let’s us be clear : the only data to trust is the one on the $XDC chain in this context. Anything you see on Globiance DEX can be manipulated. Only the CEO knows the details of this huge theft/loss.
4
9
3
57
15,872
GBEX, A 🧵 From the start, GBEX should have raised red flags. This is why we say DYOR: for situations like this. -500T supply? Those are shitcoin numbers. -2% of every transaction burned, 2% returned to holders? That’s a design feature meant to prevent retail users from selling their tokens. Retail holds, since moving tokens is penalized and holding is rewarded, while the team dumps. It serves no other purpose. It’s a trap. -Regular, massive token burns? Another tried-and-true trap, meant to keep retail holding in expectation of higher price. Meanwhile, the team dumps. -Anti-whale measures? “GBEX has a built-in mechanism to allow max 0.5% of the supplied tokens per wallet.” But a number of wallets have > 0.5% ... so, there is no such mechanism. -Bonkers (up to 14.44%) staking APY? Yet another transparent trap. Retail holds, because they were promised stupidly high returns. The team dumps. 1/n
3
20
6
43
16,413
6 TL;DR 1) GBEX’s tokenomics were scammy from the start— clearly designed to keep retail holding so the team could dump without collapsing the price totally. 2) And, indeed, the team sold. Putting it all together, the team sent about 65T GBEX to exchanges. That’s about 13% of the total supply of GBEX. And oh, by the way, it just so happens that the team was originally allocated … 13% of the total supply of GBEX. Oliver said, "our whole team has not sold one single GBEX." In fact, the evidence suggests the team sold their whole entire allocation of GBEX. 7/n
2
10
1
16
5,052
It looks increasingly likely that Oliver misappropriated user funds via Globiance, and continues to do so. As for GBEX, it gave the game away on day one with it's scammy tokenomics and Oliver's clownish claims. There were other warning signs too, which I'll share later. For now, remember: before investing, it's up to you to DYOR. This is crypto. Verify, don't trust. 8/n
20
3
40
17,618
🚨 REMINDER: FTX will return $1.6 billion to creditors on September 30.
164
167
48
1,486
138,286
blocksec retweeted
Instead of posting endlessly about your tokens withheld by Globiance, consider taking meaningful action by gathering solid information. Venting on X and calling out @XDCNetwork , @atulkhekade etc might feel satisfying but it won’t move things forward. What will help is compiling clear, accurate data and evidence. @blocksec_xdc has already provided a prelim report of where the funds went. A simple way to begin is by setting up a Google Form to collect key details from everyone affected. You could ask for: -Wallet address -Amount of XDC and other tokens withheld -Country of residence -X (Twitter) handle -Telegram username The more organized and comprehensive your data, the stronger you can build your case. Start now and take control of the situation. Wishing you all the best — you're in my thoughts. And one last tip: form a working group and assign a lead to keep things on track. Just some friendly advice. FYI. This is my personal take regarding this situation.
3
9
2
57
7,982
This is a basic misunderstanding of what crypto/XDC is. If the XDC team were responsible for or empowered to exercise oversight over the network, no institution would ever, ever touch XDC. No institution would ever, ever touch an asset that’s essentially controlled or overseen by one or more persons—that would make XDC Monopoly money. What gives XDC its value and utility above all is its decentralization. If the XDC team were willing or able to police the network, this would absolutely destroy the network’s value, which depends on the fact that the code (not any person or group) is the law. You or anyone else can pay a professional to track down your hacked or stolen XDC. That’s what normally happens in situations like this. If someone stole your cash, you wouldn’t demand the federal reserve get your money back. You’d go to the police. If someone stole your BTC, you wouldn’t try to find Satoshi so he could get it back. You’d go to the police. That’s what institutions would do too in the event that their crypto is stolen. Thats what institutions and individuals did when SBF misappropriated their funds, and they got everything back in the end. But again, the fact that the XDC team can’t help doesn’t undermine the utility and value of the network, it’s *precisely* what makes it useful and valuable. There is a very simple solution to this problem, given especially the information I’ve provided. Oliver is legally prohibited from misappropriating user funds. If you deposit funds and cannot withdraw, you have a path forward. Anonymous accounts tagging Atul, the XDC Foundation, and Interpol on Twitter are not going to achieve anything. If victims want their funds back, time for them to get serious. Now that we know the September “refunds” were a feint, I will be happy to provide a step by step guide to help users pursue legal remedies in the relevant jurisdictions. Nobody will get a single XDC back unless a) Oliver suddenly gives it back willingly, or b) a court forces him to give it back. Victims should coordinate in a secure environment (not Twitter) and probably start conversations with folks here: blockchainlawyers.group
3
1
3
693