William retweeted
Many in the comments are saying: "The French voted for this."
Fine. Now ask yourself a better question.
Why is it the same story in every Western country at once? France, Germany, Sweden, the UK, Belgium, Canada. Different languages, different histories, different voters. Same outcome. Same open-border policies, sold in the same beautiful packaging: progress, inclusion, integration, "our values."
When dozens of peoples who never coordinated end up with the exact same policy, it wasn't the peoples who decided. It was the class that governs all of them. Same schools, same forums, same networks. For decades, they have systematically lied to Europeans about what was happening and what it would cost.
They tried it with you too, America. You came close. What saved you was your Constitution, and a handful of people like Elon Musk and the All-In crew who refused to stay quiet when silence would have been easier.
But don't celebrate too early.
The West is not a country. It's a civilization. Athens, Rome, Jerusalem, and every nation that inherited or built on what came out of them: Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, Israel, and allies like Japan who share its institutions and its fate.
If Europe falls, you don't get to watch from across the ocean. You lose half your civilization, your oldest allies, the cradle of everything you believe in. Nobody on either side of the Atlantic has any interest in waking up to an Islamist Europe.
So understand that this fight has two levels.
There is the national fight. Every people has to win its own battle at home, at the ballot box, in its own institutions, under its own laws. No one can do it for us. You can't vote in France, and we can't vote in Ohio.
And there is the civilizational fight. The West is under attack on two fronts at once. From the inside, by a soft communism that hates its own history and wants to dissolve nations into a managed mass. From the outside, by Islamism, which sees our weakness and fills the vacuum. And the two have found each other: Islamo-leftism, where the far left defends the very ideology that would crush it first.
The national fights are the battles. The civilizational fight is the war.
And here's what the other side exploits: your kindness.
Western civilization produced something rare in human history: a moral instinct to extend compassion to strangers. To the refugee, the outsider, the weakest. It's one of the most beautiful things we ever built.
The globalist class turned it into a weapon against us.
Gad Saad has a name for this: suicidal empathy. Empathy that no longer asks who it protects and who pays the price. Empathy that cares more about how it looks than about what it causes. Empathy so detached from reason that it ends up sacrificing your own people, the girl attacked on her way home, the worker priced out of his neighborhood, the town that no longer recognizes itself, just to signal virtue toward strangers.
And every time you object, they don't answer your argument. They question your heart. "Where is your compassion?" That's the trap. They know a decent people will hesitate before being called cruel. They've been running that play for thirty years.
Now add the money.
A few left-wing billionaires understood long ago that you don't need to win elections if you can shape the institutions around them. The Gates Foundation became one of the largest funders of the World Health Organization. George Soros's Open Society Foundations have spent billions funding NGOs, advocacy groups and legal networks, with Europe as a major focus. Unelected, unaccountable, and extremely well organized.
And it's not only private money. Brussels funds NGOs with taxpayers' money, and those same NGOs then lobby Brussels for the policies it already wanted. A closed loop. Citizens pay for it. Nobody ever asked them.
This is the supranational machine: Brussels, the galaxy of NGOs orbiting it, the foundations feeding them, and the political class moving freely between all three. It answers to no voter in any country. It does enormous damage. And it can't be voted out, because no one ever voted it in.
And if you want to know where its center of gravity is, look at Washington.
The Democratic Party is its political headquarters. Not because every Democrat is a globalist, but because that's where the whole network converges: the big foundations, the NGO galaxy, the international organizations, the legacy media, the platforms. Same donors, same people rotating from one to the other, same worldview. Brussels is the branch office.
Covid showed it in real time.
Within weeks, almost the entire Western world adopted the same playbook. Same measures, same messaging, same "trust the science." Anthony Fauci became the face of the official line far beyond America's borders. The Gates Foundation, co-founder of the global vaccine alliances and one of the WHO's largest funders, sat at the center of global health policy. And anyone who questioned the line was branded a spreader of misinformation.
The lab-leak hypothesis was a "conspiracy theory" right up until it became a respectable one. And in 2024, Mark Zuckerberg admitted in writing that senior Biden administration officials had repeatedly pressured Meta in 2021 to censor Covid content, including humor and satire.
Government, foundations, international organizations, platforms. All moving in the same direction, at the same time, and no voter ever consulted.
That's the machine. Covid was the moment it stopped hiding.
That machine is what has to be taken apart. Defund the NGOs living off public money. Bring decisions back to elected national parliaments. Make every foundation that shapes public policy as transparent as a political party.
Compassion is a Western virtue. Letting it be used against us is not.
So let's not fall into the trap.
The trap is Western nations turning on each other. Americans mocking Europeans, Europeans sneering at Americans, each country telling itself "they deserve what's happening to them, they voted for it."
I'm pro-border. I'm pro-nation. I believe every people has the right to decide who enters its home and to defend its own culture. That will never change.
But what we face today is not one nation attacking another. It's an attack on the civilization all our nations belong to. And a civilization under attack cannot afford to let its members watch each other burn.
When you see France on fire, don't say "they chose this." Understand how it happened. Understand who did it. And understand that the same people are working on you.
The West has to stand together against this, fully, without ambiguity, and its peoples have to understand each other. National pride and civilizational solidarity are not opposites. They are the same fight at two scales.
A Frenchman voting to take back his borders and an American voting on November 3rd are on the same front, in the same war, for the same civilization.
We lose it separately, or we win it together.
To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.
William retweeted
MAGA chose the USA. The Soviet Union is gone. Let the EU socialist politburo with no elected leader take care of their back yard.
A timeless reminder of why the United States of America is an exceptional country.
The government did not give you your rights.
That is perhaps the single most important principle Americans must understand about the founding of this Republic.
The Declaration of Independence does not say our rights were granted by Congress, a President, or a majority vote. It says we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. Governments are instituted to secure those rights.
Think about the distinction.
What government grants, government may presume it can withdraw. But what belongs to mankind by nature is not the property of politicians.
Our Constitution establishes a framework of limited government, and our Bill of Rights places explicit restrictions upon its exercise of power. Those restrictions are not inconveniences to be overcome whenever a sufficiently popular cause comes along. They are safeguards against the very concentration of power our Founders understood could destroy liberty.
We saw a contemporary example of this constitutional debate just last week. On October 9, the ATF announced that it would no longer enforce key National Firearms Act approval and registration requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and certain other firearms.
The change followed a federal court's ruling that questioned the constitutional basis for those requirements after Congress eliminated the associated taxes.
The NFA itself has not been repealed (yet), and other firearms laws remain in force. But the development raises a fundamental constitutional question: When government imposes restrictions upon the exercise of an enumerated right, where does legitimate regulation end and infringement begin?
That is precisely why the distinction between rights and government-granted privileges matters.
A free people should never confuse the government's duty to protect their rights with the government's authority to dispense them.
We are citizens of a Constitutional Republic, not supplicants awaiting permission to be free.
~ MLF
Americans, if you really want things to improve, why don’t you get on the bandwagon to repeal or rewrite the Social Security Act of 1934? Make it into something that returns 3 to 4 times the current benefit to retirees, with the same 12.4% tax rate, split evenly between employee and employer. You could even keep your Social Security number for your new account identification.
Your tax payments and those of your employer would be invested in Blue Chip companies, bonds or exchange-traded funds, owned by the individual, yours to spend or pass on to your heirs, untouchable by government, managed professionally.
To appease the nervous Nellys and demagogues in the Democratic Party, set a floor on the return so it will never be less than what they would’ve gotten under traditional Ponzi Social Security. 99.9% chance the government would not need to spend a dime to support that floor.
This Bill practically writes itself. Pass this on to your congressional representatives and let’s see if we can’t get this hundred year-old stalemate broken and open a new era of wealth and independence for retirees.
William retweeted
“Prices are higher. Trump failed on inflation.”
No. That's not how inflation works. Inflation is the rate at which prices are rising. The price level is where all the inflation we've already experienced has left them.
Prices don't reset when a new President takes office.
Look at the example below.
A $100 basket of goods that increased 21.4% during Biden's term cost roughly $121.44 by January 2025.
Then we had another 5.4% cumulative inflation - 2025 through August 2026. But that 5.4% doesn't start from the original $100. It starts from $121.44.
Now that basket costs roughly $128.
So yes - prices are higher today.
Of course they are. We've continued to have inflation.
Inflation is, unfortunately, almost always with us. The goal isn't to wave a presidential wand and magically return the price level to 2020. Doing that across the economy would require broad deflation, which brings problems of its own.
Nor does any President single-handedly control inflation. Monetary and fiscal policy, energy, wages, housing and supply constraints, regulation, commodity prices, wars, population growth and consumer demand can all affect prices.
That's why “it costs more today” and “inflation is getting worse” are not interchangeable statements.
The questions that actually tell us something are: How quickly are prices rising now? Where did the current price level come from? And are the inflationary pressures improving or worsening?
Americans are still feeling the accumulated price increases of the last several years every time they buy groceries, pay rent or replace a car.
Lower inflation doesn't erase that pain. It means we're adding to it more slowly.
That's the distinction.
Inflation compounds. Price levels remember.
~ MLF
William retweeted
Donald Trump has been back in office roughly 20 months - and a tremendous amount has already changed. Yet, some have developed a microwave mentality about government.
Has everything been accomplished? Of course not. It's been twenty months - it took decades to make the mess he's cleaning up.
Yet I'm hearing people who voted for this agenda in 2024 say they're so frustrated with Republicans in Congress that they'll sit out the midterms.
No. Nope.
If you wanted to replace Republicans who weren't doing their jobs, the primaries were the time to do it. Primary them. Replace them. Dump the chumps.
But sitting out the general doesn't “stick it to the man.”
It can take away the congressional support needed to finish the very agenda you're complaining isn't moving fast enough. Think about the absurdity of that.
The change isn't happening fast enough - so let's make it harder to accomplish or cancel it altogether.
You're not sticking it to politicians. You're sticking it to your neighbors. Your children. And the future you're trying to build.
We cannot keep electing a direction, giving it less than two years, jerking the steering wheel back the other way, and then wondering why we never get anywhere.
That's not accountability. That's self-induced whiplash.
You don't move the needle by jerking the steering wheel back and forth every two years.
Stay the course!
~ MLF
William retweeted
Truer words have never been spoken.
And you just described the Democrat party to a T.
Ronald Reagan knew.
How do we undo the indoctrination of our children when they are either in college and/or after they graduate?
Socialism/Communism have the same goal - COMPLETE CONTROL by any means necessary.
It's so difficult to reason with the "all knowing" students who attend our "illustrious" universities.
After giving the students an education, which Mommy and Daddy often pay for in the end to get them out of debt for completing their degree in basket weaving, they may actually think it's fine for some other person/or government to make everything free for them and everyone else.
It's similar to asking them where eggs and steak come from. They are apt to say, "The grocery store, stupid, so why do we need all those chicken farms and cattle ranches when we can buy all that "stuff" at the grocery store?"
Too many students have had little to no parenting to teach them the way the real world works. They have never had any experience with earning an allowance or earning that new pair of tennis shoes and have absolutely no idea how much the phone costs or how much the phone bill is. They don't know that under socialism/communism they may not be allowed to have a phone.
Sadly, it seems the new generation actually thinks everything is free because they pay for nothing and never had a full-time job.
Then they see people who are homeless or drug addicts, and they feel sorry for them and think they all should get free health care just like Mommy and Daddy pay for. We all want them to be cared for, but nothing in this life is free. Someone always pays.
These university students believe everything their Marxist/Socialist/Communit/Islamist professors have told them is what they must think. SO...they mostly say and do what they are told to do or think for fear of their peers thinking they aren't as virtuous as they should be.
The students who voted for a socialists (and worse) who loves Islam believe the half-truths and lies the biased media shows them on TV, so they believe the Republicans and hardworking Americans should just give everything they earn toward taxes so the undocumented Democrats can live rent free as the students do and get the benefits they are not entitled to. The students tend to believe everyone should be entitled to free everthing, right?
These students don't seem to know where money comes from - Government has no money until it confiscates through taxes the money of those who work for a living.
Reagan was so wise.
William retweeted
What The Left REALLY means when they call us “WHITE SUPREMACISTS”:
They mean we're PATRIOTIC.
They mean we're HYGIENIC.
They mean we're PUNCTUAL.
They mean we're EDUCATED.
They mean we're ARTISTIC.
They mean we're EXPERTS.
They mean we're RESPECTFUL.
They mean we're HARD-WORKING.
They mean we're INNOVATIVE.
They mean we're DISCIPLINED.
They mean we're HONEST.
They mean we're HONORABLE.
In short:
THEY MEAN WE’RE AMERICAN!
They mean we possess a desire to grow and build and improve, not tear down and make worse.
They're not talking about cross burnings and men in white sheets.
They're talking about all the attributes that made America - and ALL THE WHITE CHRISTIAN COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD - the best in human history.
That’s what they’re fighting AGAINST.
And we must never stop fighting against THEM, because our heritage and future depend on preserving these timeless strengths.
Who’s with me on that?🇺🇸
William retweeted
He destroys the genocide arguments.
Judge Roy Altman is a sitting US district judge, and he walks through the one thing the slogan never touches. Genocide is a legal charge. It turns on intent. Not on a body count, and not on how bad the pictures look.
He puts the real ones on the table. The Turks and the Armenians. The Germans and six million Jews. Rwanda, roughly 800,000 people in under sixty days. Nobody evacuates the people they mean to wipe out. They don’t spend ten days moving them, then go in after the gunmen.
That’s what he says Israel did before Rafah. The government declassified the War Cabinet orders for the ICJ case. His point is simple. Not one of those orders tells the army to exterminate Palestinians. The opposite. Get the civilians out, then hit the Hamas battalion holding the hostages. Sinwar died in that city. The Nazis didn’t operate like that. The Turks didn’t operate like that either.
You can argue the war. You can argue the tactics. You cannot take a legal term built for intent to destroy a people and slap it on an army that keeps trying to move that people out of the way. The word is doing propaganda work, not legal work.
William retweeted
I’m often asked what I call the actions of Israel in Gaza.
I call it urban warfare, an extremely difficult type of war which tragically has a high casualty rate.
I call it the result of having been the target of 30,000-40,000 rockets aimed at civilians for decades.
I call it the natural outcome when you have people living beside you who constantly try to kill the citizens of your country.
I call it the culmination of multiple attempts at ceasefires and peace negotiations and offers of land for recognition and peace that never go anywhere.
I call it the only option after a savage massacre that saw 1200 brutal murders, countless rapes, 250 kidnappings, the strangulation of a 9-month and 4-year old, months of torture of hostages and their families, and a promise to do it over and over and over again.
I call it a sane rational decision after rats sneak into your country, hunt the people of your nation, and then scurry like rats underground to hide from your response, putting their own citizens between themselves and your rockets and bombs.
I call it the government of Gaza, Hamas, intentionally trying to sacrifice the lives of the people of Gaza in order to turn public opinion against Israel.
I call it tragic and horrific and devastating for the innocent people who have gotten caught up in this situation that their government has created, on purpose.
I call it the absolute only choice Israel has to try and stop the bloodshed and bring peace to the region.
I call it a miracle that Israel, despite how vicious the attack of Oct 7 was, has shown incredible patience and restraint in doing everything it can to minimize deaths and injuries to innocent victims, as few countries would have done the same.
And I call it disgraceful and disgusting that despite all of that, much of the world chooses to believe the lies and propaganda that Hamas and the Free Palestine movement are shoving down their throats, and have turned on Israel, one of the greatest countries in the world, by far.
That’s what I call it.
I think a lot of the frustration on the right about “not getting enough done” stems directly from the fact that the prior administration had made such an egregious, unfathomable mess that even the most astounding and capable Republican government could not possibly clean it up in a single term.
But we don’t have an astounding and capable Republican government. We have a bare, slim theoretical majority in both houses. And even that majority, principally in the Senate, has an outsized portion of weak-kneed participants.
So given these practical limitations, the Republican controlled Congress has done a reasonably good job, but the pile of things in front of us still undone is causing heartburn for impatient patriots.
So let’s suck it up, get out and vote; get those SOLID majorities in place and make the second two years of President Trump‘s third term one for the ages.
William retweeted
HYPOTHETICALLY… IF I BOUGHT MY HOUSE FOR $125,000 IN 2002 AND THE COUNTY NOW SAYS IT’S WORTH $487,000, WHERE DID I ACTUALLY MAKE $362,000?
Did I sell it? No.
Did I receive $362,000? No.
Did somebody hand me a check for the new assessed value? Obviously not.
But my property taxes still go up because, on paper, my house is suddenly worth hundreds of thousands more.
That’s the part that doesn’t make sense to me.
This isn’t income.
It isn’t cash sitting in my bank account.
It’s a number someone assigned to my property, and now I’m being billed based on that number.
If my stock portfolio doubles but I don’t sell, I haven’t turned that gain into cash.
If my salary stays the same, I don’t suddenly owe more income tax because someone thinks I’m worth more.
So why does owning a home work differently?
WHY AM I PAYING TAX ON A GAIN I NEVER REALIZED?
A house isn’t just an investment.
It’s where people live.
You can pay off the mortgage, own the property outright, and still face a bigger bill every year because the value of the house went up on paper.
At some point, you have to ask what “owning” something actually means if the cost of keeping it can keep rising because of money you never received.
THIS ISN’T ABOUT WHETHER THE HOUSE IS “WORTH” MORE.
IT’S ABOUT BEING CHARGED FOR VALUE YOU NEVER TURNED INTO CASH.
And people are starting to notice.
William retweeted
An invitation to American Muslims
Many Americans want a straightforward public statement from their Muslim neighbors, coworkers, and fellow citizens. If the following reflects your position, saying so plainly would reduce suspicion and strengthen trust.
Do you affirm that your first and only civic loyalty is to the United States, its Constitution, and its laws, and that where any interpretation of Islamic law (Sharia) conflicts with those laws—on equal rights, free speech, apostasy, blasphemy, inheritance, testimony, or criminal penalties—you accept that American law governs?
Do you reject the use of violence, threats, intimidation, or legal harassment to silence criticism of Islam, to punish apostasy or blasphemy, or to pressure others into religious observance?
Do you accept the ordinary freedoms of American public life—including the right of others to leave Islam, to criticize or satirize it, and to live by different moral rules—without treating those freedoms as offenses that must be curtailed?
A clear yes on these points is compatible with private religious practice. A refusal, qualification that subordinates the Constitution, or silence in the face of coercion carried out in the name of Islam is what generates the question in the first place.
No answer is in itself an answer.
MamaDuck is so right. Your retirement plan should be part of your estate which you can pass on to your chosen beneficiaries however you see fit. I guarantee you I would not choose the federal government as my beneficiary. And I guarantee I could get a better return on the money invested over the years in this Ponzi scheme, probably by a factor of three or more. I’ve run the numbers. We’re being screwed.
So many people, particularly on the left, democrats, communists, complain about the lack of generational wealth yet they’re the very people who made it impossible to build generational wealth by burdening us with garbage like the Social Security Act.
Don’t forget how they plunder old married people. My husband paid SS from 1975 to 2011. He made the most If he passes I can take his allotment—but guess what? My check disappears. It just vanished and when both of us are gone the rest of his money is gone —which mansion did we build? IF THE MEDIA DID ITS JOB EVERYONE WOULD KNOW THIS. in 74 years I haven’t heard a thing.
