camper 🦎🎣

It absolutely does. Both companies should have it. Because the price jump from 20 to 100 dollars is way too steep. So for normal customers, who do not hardcore code all the time, it'll be perfect. Instead of buying multiple 20 dollars account when one runs out.

And to use your subs normally, we need to run your models in Fast mode (2.5x more) AND your subscription gives about half of what of Anthropic gives, real numbers: Pro 100= 2x Pro 100= 4x Pro 500=10x YIKES

The biggest bottleneck for Chinese AI worldwide adaptation isn't the quality of models but abysmal usage limits in their subscription services, they just cannot compete with the generosity of US AI labs.

Hey @grok remove only ONE company that you dislike and why?

Hey @grok why big tech companies still hire software engineers when AI pretty can do all their work anyway?

If Anthropic and OpenAI isn't always going for each other's throats, then we'll be at least an year behind in AI progress. Competition breeds innovation.

Get out of your basement, Mr. Reset and give us Astra 6.2 😭 @thsottiaux

Hey @grok, why people are paying 200s of dollars for Grok bot when you can just use Hermes bot for free? Am I missing something?

As someone who has both Chatgpt and Claude subs, using @t3dotcodes by @theo is a breeze. I have been using that app for 2 weeks now, still working on the full review of it. But here is my 2 favorite features: 1. Delegation: You can just delegate the task from a single thread to any model with any effort value and your agent will do that as a subagent. 2. Handoff: context handoff from claude to chatgpt and vice versa, T3 code has the best/seamless implementation of it. These two things has made multi subs effortless. Give that amazing piece of software a try, you will not be disappointed.

🚨 Fable 5.5 TESTING Part 15 🧪 I asked Claude to inject blue ink into a glass flask of water. One prompt. I never touched three.js. 🤯 ⏱️ 156 minutes 💸 $24.17 in API costs 🤖 Claude Fable 5.5 Xhigh in Claude Code What it did on its own 👇 🌊 Wrote its own fluid solver: 39.3 million cells at 0.38 mm, baked in 66 minutes on a laptop RTX 4060 💧 Pushed 33.5 million ink particles through that flow, rendered in three.js 🔮 Ray-traced the glass and water with real refraction, Fresnel and total internal reflection, plus 1 million photons a frame for the blue caustic on the floor ⏳ 10x slow motion through the jet, then a time-lapse of up to 50x to a fully mixed sphere, all in one continuous shot 🔊 Synthesized every sound in code and timed it to the film speed, so the plunger's groan slows down with the slow-mo 🔍 Spotted faint ladder bands in the jet, measured the particle density on the GPU and traced them to 3 separate bugs ⚖️ Caught its fluid sim quietly losing 58% of the ink while stirring, and put it back 📦 30 s · 1080p60 · 1,800 frames · 640 velocity keys · 6.2 GB bake · 25.5-minute render

🚨 Fable 5.5 TESTING Part 14 ⚡ I asked Claude to ride a lightning bolt from cloud to ground. One prompt. I never touched the code. 🤯 ⏱️ 182 minutes 💸 $17.57 in API costs 🤖 Claude Fable 5.5 Xhigh in Claude Code What it did on its own 👇 ⛈️ Simulated the storm on a 30.5M-cell grid: rising air, rain, ice and electric charge, with 63 flashes logged 🌩️ Grew the bolt with a dielectric breakdown sim: 16 m grid, 53,505 cells, about -110 MV at the root 👁️ Rode the camera on the tip for all 60 steps of the leader 🔥 Burned the scar with the same kind of physics into a prairie of 2.4M grass blades 🎧 Synthesised every sound: the hum climbs with each step, then 130 ms of dead silence before the crack 🐛 Caught the bolt stopping 752 m above the ground and resumed the sim instead of restarting it 🚨 Scanned every frame, found a full-screen strobe at 4 to 6 Hz and fixed it before I ever saw it 📦 28 s · one unbroken shot · 1080p60 · three.js + Taichi