#Patriot #GodblessAmerica #standforourflag #wethepeople #MAGA #TrumpisbestPresidentever #blessedAmericanwoman #VoterID
United States
Joined June 2009
- Tweets224K
- Following42.8K
- Followers50.6K
- Likes297K
C.A. retweeted
🚨In the face of an unholy alliance that seeks to erode our borders, our values, and the very foundations of our Constitutional Republic, John Bucciarelli (@JohnBuccia3633) has sounded the alarm with clarity and urgency.
Every American citizen who truly loves this country and is determined to preserve its national identity must read his document, share it widely, and act—before the midterms and beyond. The time to defend our Republic is now. Stand up for your country. 🇺🇸 👊
John Bucciarelli’s document, An Unholy Alliance: Globalists, Democrats, Socialists and Islamism, lays out his case that this coalition threatens the nation, its way of life, and its sovereignty. He wrote it in August 2026 specifically to reach the public ahead of the November midterms and has repeatedly called on patriots to spread it with a sense of urgency. The full document is available via the link (drive.google.com/file/d/1ONm…) Read it, share it, and help protect the Constitutional Republic.
Never surrender to communists, globalists, islamists and socialists! 👊
AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE: GLOBALISTS, DEMOCRATS, SOCIALISTS and ISLAMISM
Our nation, Our values and Our way of life is being attacked!
I spent the month of August 2026 writing this document to get it out to the public by Labor Day weekend. The mid-term elections in November 2026 are quickly approaching. We cannot allow the Alliance to gain political momentum again. I ask all Patriots to share my sense of urgency.
The document is available at this link: drive.google.com/file/d/1ONm…
C.A. retweeted
Nicki Minaj is such a Superstar. She just gave a Beautiful Speech at Trump‘s Michigan Rally. States he has given us a Future to look forward too, a brighter future.
Calling on a “Major State like Michigan to lead in the movement” “if you run again, I will support you again”🔥🔥🔥
C.A. retweeted
He landed his helicopter between American soldiers and the villagers they were about to kill. Then he told his own crew: if they open fire, shoot them.
March 16, 1968. My Lai, South Vietnam. Hugh Thompson Jr., a 24-year-old Army warrant officer from Georgia, was flying a small scout helicopter over the village with two young crewmen, Glenn Andreotta and Lawrence Colburn.
They were supposed to spot enemy fire. There was none. What they saw instead were unarmed civilians, women, children and old men, being killed by American troops.
Thompson saw soldiers moving toward a bunker where villagers were hiding. He set the helicopter down in the line of fire, climbed out and confronted the officer in charge.
Andreotta and Colburn stood by the helicopter with their guns ready, aimed at their own side.
Thompson coaxed about ten villagers out of the bunker and called in gunships to fly them to safety. Then his crew spotted movement in a ditch. Andreotta climbed in and pulled out a small boy, alive. They flew him to a hospital.
Back at base, Thompson reported everything. An order went out to stop the killing.
He was not treated as a hero. For years he was shunned and threatened, and some in Washington said he was the one who should be punished. Andreotta was killed in combat three weeks later.
Thirty years after that day, in 1998, the Army finally awarded all three men the Soldier's Medal at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
The general who led the Army's investigation wrote, "If there was a hero of My Lai, he, Thompson, was it."
Courage isn't only facing the enemy. Sometimes it's standing up to your own side.
Disclaimer: Based on Army records, the 1998 Soldier's Medal citation and news reports. The citation credits the crew with saving at least ten civilians. Andreotta's medal was awarded after his death.
Photos: U.S. Army (OH-23 helicopter; Hugh Thompson Jr. portrait), public domain; Adam Jones (Co Luy village, CC BY-SA 3.0); James Emery (OH-23 Raven and UH-1 Iroquois, CC BY 2.0); Almonroth (Vietnam Veterans Memorial, CC BY-SA 3.0); via Wikimedia Commons
C.A. retweeted
201 years ago today, a cannon fired in Buffalo, New York. A few miles down the line, another cannon heard it and fired. Then another, and another, all the way across the state and down the Hudson. About an hour and a half later, the boom reached New York City, more than 500 miles away.
The Erie Canal was open.
Almost nobody thought it could be done. Thomas Jefferson called the idea "little short of madness." Critics mocked it as "Clinton's Ditch," after Governor DeWitt Clinton, who bet his career on it.
The problem was enormous. The land rises about 600 feet between the Hudson River and Lake Erie. And America had no trained civil engineers. The men who laid out the route were judges. One had used a surveying instrument for only a few hours before the job began.
So they learned as they dug. Irish laborers and German stonemasons cut through forest, swamp and solid rock with shovels, horses and muscle. At Lockport they carved a staircase of locks straight up the Niagara Escarpment.
Eight years later, it stretched 363 miles from Albany to Buffalo.
Clinton boarded a boat called the Seneca Chief and rode the whole way to New York. Ten days later, in New York Harbor, he poured a keg of Lake Erie water into the sea. They called it the Wedding of the Waters. A keg of ocean water went back the other way and was poured into the lake.
Before the canal, Buffalo to New York took two weeks by stagecoach. Now goods could float the whole way. Tolls paid off the construction debt within the first year, and New York became the busiest port in the country.
The "ditch" built a nation's front door.
Would you have bet on Clinton's Ditch?
Disclaimer: Based on historical accounts of the 1825 opening. Timing of the cannon relay and some figures vary by source.
Photos: Anthony Imbert (New York celebration, 1825); National Museum of American History (DeWitt Clinton engraving); Herrmann J. Meyer (Lockport lithograph, c.1855); Arthur B. Davies (Along the Erie Canal, 1890); all public domain via Wikimedia Commons
C.A. retweeted
She was the first Black person ever to win an Oscar. Then her Oscar vanished, and nobody has found it since.
Hattie McDaniel came to Los Angeles with a big voice and a gift for comedy. To get by, she worked as a maid.
In 1939 she was cast as Mammy in Gone with the Wind.
She wasn't allowed at its Atlanta premiere. The theater was whites-only. Clark Gable threatened to boycott, and McDaniel talked him into going anyway.
On February 29, 1940, she went to the Academy Awards at the Ambassador Hotel's Cocoanut Grove in Los Angeles, nominated for Best Supporting Actress. The hotel had a strict no-Black policy. She was let in as a favor and seated at a small segregated table against the far wall, away from her co-stars.
Then they read her name.
She walked to the stage with gardenias in her hair and said she hoped to always be a credit to her race. She was in tears.
When critics attacked her for playing maids, she answered: "Why should I complain about making $700 a week playing a maid? If I didn't, I'd be making $7 a week being one."
She died of breast cancer on October 26, 1952. Her last wish was to be buried in Hollywood Cemetery. It refused. It was segregated.
She left her award to Howard University, where it sat in a glass case.
Then, sometime in the late 1960s or early 1970s, it was gone.
No record of what happened to it. A rumor said protesters threw it into the Potomac. A law professor who investigated called that baseless. It has never turned up.
In 2023, the Academy gave Howard a replacement, 83 years after she won.
They kept her out of the premiere and out of the cemetery. They couldn't keep her out of history.
Disclaimer: Supporting winners then got a plaque, not a statuette. Accounts vary on her exact words and when the award disappeared.
Photos: Fred Parrish/Selznick International (Gone with the Wind, 1939, public domain); Los Angeles Times (1940, CC BY-SA 4.0); Tichnor Brothers (Cocoanut Grove postcard, public domain); ajay_suresh (Howard University, CC BY 4.0); via Wikimedia Commons
C.A. retweeted
I don’t know if the Wright Brothers had this in mind when they were dreaming of their flying machine, but there is no doubt that man has a vivid imagination when it comes to getting off the ground. These entries are from the Red Bull Flugtag held in Minneapolis this year.
It’s amazing to think about going from simple machines like these to Elon’s rocket boosters returning to Earth in 120 years time. Where will we be in the next 100 years? ✈️ 🚀 🌎
C.A. retweeted
🥁✨𝙎𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙛𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙪𝙢𝙥 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙖 𝙛𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙪𝙢𝙥.
Except in 2008.
The Barack and Michelle fist bump signaled a victory lap before the race even started.👀🍿
Barack Obama is the luckiest guy in the world. Has he ever been held accountable beyond accusations?
No.
Benghazi. IRS targeting of conservative groups. Fast and Furious. Solyndra. The loading of billions in cash for Iran onto pallets, the Russia, Russia, hit on his successor that DNI Tulsi alleged was treason.
Each produced smoke, congressional investigations, inspector general reports, and—in some rare cases—resignations or discipline for subordinates.
None produced criminal charges, indictments, or legal consequences for Obama himself.
Even the 2025–2026 document releases and DOJ reviews of Obama-era officials have, as of late 2026, resulted in no charges against the former president.
That fist bump was the start.
The raids and hounding of former presidents appears selective.
🤖 Made with AI
C.A. retweeted
George Soros didn’t just fund “civil society.”
He built a capillary system:
Private money seeds the organization → network gets it public grants (EU, USAID, governments) → taxpayer cash scales the agenda.
Think tanks write the papers. NGOs run the campaigns. Lawyers file the suits.
Media covers it favorably.
Fact-checkers police the narrative.
Prizes, chairs, festivals, prosecutors — all funded, all aligned.
Not a conspiracy. A system.
The most successful private takeover of public institutions in modern history. With this private power they’re rewriting the rules of your country with your money!
Is this open society… or open-society capture?
If one network can fund the NGOs, the lawyers, the media, the prosecutors and other — who is actually running the country?
C.A. retweeted
🚨This is the most important thing people still don’t understand before they vote.
It’s not a secret handshake or a conspiracy theory. It’s a production line.
Same schools, same summer programs, same Davos rooms, same language, same blind spots. By the time they reach power, most of them literally cannot process the idea that a country has a right to remain itself.
Immigration is treated as a spreadsheet problem (labor, demographics, moral performance), never as a civilizational one. They weren’t brainwashed in two weeks at Harvard — they were selected for already agreeing, then rewarded for never questioning the frame.
That selection process is still running right now. The next wave of candidates is already being filtered through the same pipeline. Every election cycle we treat this like normal politics is another cycle where the people who will decide your children’s future have been trained to see your concerns as a bias to correct rather than a reality to address.
Before you vote for anyone — left, right, or “centrist” — ask the question the post ends with: “who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?”Then share this with people who still think all leaders just “happen” to sound the same. The window to interrupt the production line is smaller than most realize.
To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line.
In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF selects a few hundred people under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership."
Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine.
Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it.
The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it.
Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition.
So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego.
That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together.
Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one.
That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address.
That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality.
And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks.
Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?
