Carly Levitz

ALT Screenshot of a Tableau dashboard of Survivor Australia Season 1. There are data on Tribal Council Attendance, confessional counts, individual immunity wins, number of votes received, and hidden idols found. Matt's data are highlighted as an example of how the interactive Tableau dashboard works. In this case, it's highlighting his "votes received"; the information in the hover over includes when the votes against him were cast and who voted against him and how many times. It also highlights his name in the other graphs. Data are from https://github.com/doehm/survivoR, an open-source curation of Survivor data for Australia, South African, USA, and New Zealand. Screenshot is from the "single season info" dashboard option from the Table of Contents, filtered to Australia season 1 / 2016. Feedback and data edits welcome!

ALT The Anonymous voting network through episode 3. Each player is in a circle, and the thickness of the outline around the player indicates how many people they have voted with. Lines connect players who have voted together. If they have voted together twice, the lines are thicker. Players who have been eliminated have a blue slash over their picture. Sydney voted w/ no one; eliminated. Marcel has only voted with Robbi. Robbi has voted with Marcel, Christopher, and Andy. Andy has voted with Robbi, Lilly, Dillian (twice), and Xavier. Lilly has voted with Dillian, Xavier, and Andy. Dillian has voted with Tyrenna, Xavier (twice), Lilly, Nina, and Andy (twice). Tyrenna has voted with Dillian, Xavier, and Nina (twice). Christopher has voted with Jack, Xavier, Nina, and Robbi. Jack has voted with Xavier, Kacie, Nina, and Christopher. Nina has voted with Christopher, Jack, Tyrenna (twice), Xavier (twice), Dillian, and Kacie. Kacie (eliminated) voted w/ Nina, Jack, Tyrenna, Xavier, and Dillian

ALT The Anonymous: You want to stay anonymous...should you vote alone or with others? Background of pink/purple galaxy. Four hexagons, each with a statement and pictures of players. Photos from https://ew.com/the-anonymous-reality-show-cast-reveal-exclusive-8676239. My twitter handle is @carlylevitz and I'm @carly.sue.bear on instagram. Voted alone twice: Marcel and Lilly. Voted alone once: Tyrenna, Sydney, Christopher, and Jack. Never voted alone: Kacie, Dillian, Robbi, Andy, and Nina. Always voted in the plurality: Xavier.

ALT Screenshot of R code, mostly all in comments: Title: Do your own analysis! By: You! Date: Today Purpose: practice data wrangling, answer burning questions I have about food TV shows, provide feedback to carly about her data packages Source: install.packages(c("topChef", "touRnamentofchampions")) Find more information at: github.com/celevitz/topChef github.com/celevitz/touRnamentofchampions

ALT Top Chef: Challenge Stats before Final Four. Table where columns are: chef, % of times the chef was in the top of all challenges (including wins), % of challenges they won, % of challenges they were in the top for but didn't win, and % of challenges for which they were on the bottom. The denominator for each chef, including Laura, is the total number of challenges when there were five or more chefs in the competition. Eliminations are part of the “low” percent. “Top” is sum of “win” and “high” percents. Data: github.com/celevitz/topChef. Starting with the current season, three of the four chefs in the final four have been in the top of challenges the same amount: 42.9%. Savannah has the greatest win % (23.8%) and Dan has the greatest high-but-not-win % (33.3%). Savannah has the lowest % of being in the bottom: 9.5%. Danny, Dan, and Laura all have the same % of being in the bottom: 23.8%.

ALT Of all past final fours in Top Chef: (a) 21 chefs had a higher % of being in the top than Savannah, Danny, and Dan; (b) 19 chefs had a higher win % than Savannah; (c) 15 chefs had a better % of being in the bottom than Savannah. There are 85 people who have been in the top four of 21 seasons of Top Chef. Season 5 had two people tied for fourth place. Stats exclude the challenges with four or fewer chefs in the competition. The next slide has spoilers for Final Fours of past seasons. Data: github.com/celevitz/topChef Of the 85 chefs who have been in the final four of their seasons, Savannah is in the top 25% in terms of being in the top of challenges, and is in the top 20% for her win % and her % of times being in the bottom.

ALT Eight chefs were in the top for more than 50% of their challenges prior to the Final Four. Table where columns are: chef, % of times the chef was in the top of all challenges (including wins), % of challenges they won, % of challenges they were in the top for but didn't win, and % of challenges for which they were on the bottom. Data: github.com/celevitz/topChef Of all final four chefs, eight of them were in the top of their challenges more than 50% of the time. Sheldon in season 14 was in the top 64.7%, and was high-but-didn't-win 52.9% of the time. Buddha was in the top 52.4% of the time and won 38.1% of the time. These eight chefs were mentioned by the judges (were in the top or bottom of challenges) ranging between 61.9% (Buddha, season 20) to 89.5% of the time (Gregory, season 12).

ALT Average %s of the final fours by season. Table where the columns are season number, average of the final four's % of being the top, average of the final four's % of winning challenges, average of the final four's % being in the top but not winning, and average of the final four's % being in the bottom of challenges. Data: github.com/celevitz/topChef Looking at the average of the final four chefs in each season, season 14's final four had the highest average % of being in the top of challenges (45.6%) and % high-but-didn't-win (30.9%). Season 6's final four had the lowest % of being in the bottom of challenges (5.2%). Season 17's final four had the highest win % of challenges (22.7%). Season 21 has the 8th best average of the final four's % of being in the top of challenges (38.1%). They have the 11th best average % of being in the bottom (20.2%)

ALT Season 21 has similar rates of team elimination challenges as past seasons. The median percent of elimination challenges that were team ones prior to each season’s RW (Restaurant Wars) is 50%. Similarly, the median for through E9 (episode 9) is 55.6%. Line graph where X axis is season number and Y axis is the percent of elimination challenges that were team challenges. The data are listed as follows: season #, % of elimination challenges that were team challenges through episode 9, # of elimination challenges that were team challenges prior to restaurant wars. S1: 33%, 33%. S2: 44%, 44%. S3: 43%, 43%. S4: 78%, 75%. S5: 44%, 38%. S6: 44%, 38%. S7: 44%, 38%. S8: 56%, 67%. S9: 71%, 71%. S10: 50%, 44%. S11: 56%, 50%. S12: 44%, 50%. S13: 44%, 38%. S14: 75%, 83%. S15: 56%, 43%. S16: 56%, 67%. S17: 56%, 57%. S18: 44%, 43%. S19: 56%, 57%. S20: 56%, 50%. S21: 56%, 57%.

ALT Six columns, with rows color-coded by player. The columns are: player, # of episodes in, # of hashtags used, # hashtags used per episode, # of hashtags per private chat shown, and # of hashtags per public chat shown. If they used the same hashtag multiple times in a chat, it counts separately each time. The number of private chats include 1:1s, group private chats, and influencer charts. Circle chats and games count as public chats. Data from The Circle season 6. Each column is ordered in a descending way, with lines connecting each players' data in each column. In order of the six columns: Olivia: 13, 73, 5.6, 3.0, 0.9. Kyle: 13, 82, 6.3, 3.6, 0.8. Lauren: 13, 31, 2.4, 1.4, 0.3. Quori-Tyler: 12, 52, 4.3, 1.9, 0.8. Myles: 12, 60, 5.0, 2.2, 0.7. Jordan: 8, 30, 3.8, 2.3, 0.5. Paul: 8, 26, 3.3, 1.5, 0.6. Cassie: 6, 16, 2.7, 1.8, 0.6. Autumn: 5, 13, 2.6, 1.8, 0.3. Steffi: 4, 13, 3.3, 1.8, 1.0. Max: 3, 12, 4.0, 1.1, 0.8.