Callicles, in Plato's Gorgias, states that moral "conventions...are made...by the weaklings who form the majority of mankind" but "nature...demonstrates that it is right that...the stronger [should prevail] over the weaker". Many assume this is what Nietzsche believed. But Nietzsche's view was almost the opposite. "Nature" (via selection, numbers, cunning, and herd instincts) tends to favor the majority, the masses, the mediocre, and the parasitic or insect swarming over the exceptional, the tiger, lion, the hero. In The Will to Power (in the "Anti-Darwin" passages), he writes: "What surprises me most on making a general survey of the great destinies of man, is that I invariably see the reverse of what today Darwin and his school sees or will persist in seeing: selection in favour of the stronger, the better constituted, and the progress of the species. Precisely the reverse of this stares one in the face: the suppression of the lucky cases, the uselessness of the more highly constituted types, the inevitable mastery of the mediocre, and even of those who are below mediocrity…the strongest and happiest natures are weak when they are confronted with a majority ruled by gregarious instincts and the fear which possesses the weak." White men in the West today are weak beyond anything Nietzsche could have anticipated. Even the liberal John Stuart Mill, back in 1836, already lamented how white men had lost their vitality and strength of will and character: "[T]here has crept over the refined classes, over the whole class of gentlemen in England, a moral effeminacy, an ineptitude for every kind of struggle. They shrink from all effort, from everything which is troublesome and disagreeable…They cannot undergo labor, they cannot brook ridicule, they cannot brave evil tongues: they have not the hardihood to say an unpleasant thing to any one whom they are in the habit of seeing…This torpidity and cowardice, as a general characteristic, is new in the world…it is a natural consequence of the progress of civilization, and will continue until met by a system of cultivation adapted to counteract it." Imagine if Mill was alive to witness the Western world today. Nietzsche was right: the white race, despite a history of the grandest achievements, is set to be swarmed by the lowest elements of humanity. The Earth belongs to Africans and Indians.

You don't understand anything happening in the US right now unless you read Elon Musk all the way through. When he says that by 2036 money won't matter anymore, most people hear a billionaire's provocation. I hear something else. Money is the fuel of every corruption system. Earmarked subsidies, public contracts negotiated behind closed doors, lobbies, front NGOs, regulatory rents. The day AI and robots produce more than humanity can consume, that lever disappears. And everyone who lives off that lever disappears with it. There are a lot of them. And they've understood perfectly. That's why we're now reading that Musk is preparing for "war" if Democrats take back Congress. He's not the one declaring war. It's an entire system that knows it's fighting for its survival. Because we're at a turning point in human history. And there are only two ways out. Either the Democrats win, and we enter 1984. A hyper-class that controls the AI models, the robot fleets, the data, the currency, and owns 99% of everything. Below them, the rest of humanity on life support, dependent on an income that can be granted and taken away. Klaus Schwab's Davos Forum summed up this world in one sentence: "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy." It's communism, except instead of promising equality, it embraces caste. And for the first time in history, a caste won't need the consent of the people to hold power: robots will do the policing, AI will do the surveillance. Or we build a new order founded on merit, freedom, and private property. Where everyone remains the owner of their life, their work, and their share of the abundance. Where the collective ambition isn't managing scarcity, but understanding the universe and colonizing the cosmos. That's Elon Musk's project. The technology is the same in both cases. What changes is who owns it. Choose carefully which world you want to live in. And beware of socialists who promise to share the pie: they always end up keeping the knife.

American has been researching Islam and what he’s learned has horrified him “I'm a gay guy reading the Quran, and I literally cannot sleep tonight because of what has happened over the last 3 weeks of reading this book — I'm not just reading the book, I'm studying it. I look at verses using different translations, I look at Prophet Muhammad, and like I've been learning all about the history, the context, its relationship to other religions. To be completely honest, I've become much more fearful of Islam than when I even started this journey — I don't want to spread hate towards general people who are Muslim because I do believe that probably a vast majority of Muslim people do not actually have an extremist point of view. But I also at the same time believe that it only takes 5 to 10% of Muslims in Islam to exist with an extremist view to be a genuine threat to Western life and democracy. 🚨 The reason I become more fearful is because I genuinely am coming to believe, looking at not just the Quran but also Islam as a culture and history surrounding Islam, that the goal of Islam actually is to come in, in the name of peace, get into politics, conquer and then turn the country into Islamic law, which doesn't actually make room for religious freedom or a lot of the freedoms that we're used to in democratic life Like, I'm gay. That ain't gonna fly when they come in and take over. So what do we do? Let's have a conversation about this” I can tell you what we should do about this. We need mass deportations. We need to denaturalize and deport. We need to revoke visas, status and citizenship of Muslims and mass deport them while we still can. I don’t care if that’s controversial, that’s the answer

Good conversation with @cclassonyoutube - check it out and subscribe to his channel. Discussing Masculinity, Marriage, and Mentorship with Carmine Castiglione youtu.be/-qdoP_cjxd0?is=gb6Z… via @YouTube

Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men. And they finally figured out why. They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas. The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality. First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children. When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity." It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time. But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy. The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones. Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark. They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse. If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable. If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world. When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering. A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability. A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7. The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide. Nobody explicitly coded these rules. This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.

Marco Rubio just said Americans who don’t want our country flooded with Indians on H-1B Visas are “stupid and dumb” I’m tagging @marcorubio so you can let him know what you think. Call me whatever you want, IDGAF.

This

सऊदी वाले मामले में झूठ vs सच - पूरा सच जानिए! सोशल मीडिया पर झूठ फैलाया जा रहा है कि वो पति-पत्नी थे, उनकी 8 साल की बेटी है, हज यात्री थे... ये सब अफवाह है! सच क्या है? 14 अक्टूबर 2026 को सऊदी अरब के मक्का में जिन दो लोगों को मौत की सजा दी गई, वो बांग्लादेश के *नज़रुल इस्लाम अब्दुल बासिर और सिति अख्तर* थे, और वो पति-पत्नी भी नहीं थे। बांग्लादेश मीडिया के मुताबिक नज़रुल 2022 में क्लीनर बनकर सऊदी गया था और सिति वहीं काम कर रही थी। मई 2023 में, हज से लगभग 1 महीने पहले, दोनों को मक्का की एक मस्जिद के अंदर सऊदी सुरक्षा बलों ने कथित तौर पर अनैतिक कृत्य करते हुए पकड़ा था। उसके बाद 3 साल से ज्यादा जेल में रहे, जेद्दा की अदालत में सुनवाई चली, और दोषी पाए जाने पर शाही आदेश के बाद 14 अक्टूबर 2026 को मक्का में फांसी दी गई। 18 अक्टूबर को शव बांग्लादेश भेजे गए। सजा क्यों इतनी सख्त? मक्का की हर मस्जिद का अपना एहतेराम है, वो हमारे नबी ﷺ से जुड़ी है। सऊदी के "पब्लिक डिसेंसी लॉ" में मस्जिद में ऐसा कृत्य सख्त वर्जित है, और मक्का की मस्जिद में पवित्रता भंग करने पर मामला "ताज़ीर" के तहत बहुत गंभीर हो जाता है, जिसमें मौत तक की सजा है। सऊदी गृह मंत्रालय के मुताबिक दोनों पर मस्जिद के अंदर "फिअल अल-फाहीशा" यानी गंभीर यौन प्रकृति का अश्लील कृत्य / व्यभिचार का आरोप सिद्ध हुआ था। बांग्लादेश की विदेश राज्य मंत्री शामा ओबायेद इस्लाम ने खुद 17 अक्टूबर को इसकी पुष्टि की है। तो सवाल ये नहीं कि वो कहाँ के थे, सवाल ये है - क्या आप अल्लाह के घर की पाकीज़गी का ख्याल रखेंगे या नहीं? मस्जिद इबादत की जगह है, बेहयाई की नहीं! जो मक्का की पाक सरज़मीन पर ऐसा करेगा, उसे सजा तो मिलेगी ही। अफवाह फैलाना बंद कीजिए, सच को समझिए। #Makkah #SaudiArabia #SachVsJhooth

BREAKING: Saudi Arabia Executes Bangladeshi Newlyweds Over Forehead Kiss in Mecca Mosque Two Bangladeshi nationals, identified as Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siri Akhtar, have reportedly been executed in Saudi Arabia following their conviction over an alleged immoral act inside a mosque in Mecca. Reports circulating in Bangladesh claim the incident involved a kiss on the forehead between the newlyweds, who had travelled to Mecca for their honeymoon. The gesture was reportedly an expression of gratitude to Allah for their marriage. Their bodies have reportedly been returned to Bangladesh in two coffins for burial.