
Into: ambiguity (watching). He. https://teapaw.org/t.co/4xLJ0ebN7J @ccshan@woof.group
PEAMSBOSAARNYCBZOITHTYOSFOINDT
Joined January 2010
- Tweets8.1K
- Following619
- Followers1.2K
- Likes36
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
Impressive results from PERPL, a new probabilistic programming language with exact inference! Reminiscent of work by @DaphneKoller & students in 1990s, but goes much further to handle recursion using (de|re)functionalization, sort of a generalization of #nlproc grammar transforms
Accepted at OOPSLA 2023: "Exact Recursive Probabilistic Programming" with @ccshan and Colin McDonald. Preprint arxiv.org/abs/2210.01206 Code github.com/diprism/perpl
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
Accepted at OOPSLA 2023: "Exact Recursive Probabilistic Programming" with @ccshan and Colin McDonald. Preprint arxiv.org/abs/2210.01206 Code github.com/diprism/perpl
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
Donald Trump asking the SCOTUS to invalidate an election, suspend the Constitution & just declare him president is wild AF
That would essentially mean the Jan 6 insurrection was successful. There’s no way anyone who knows REAL HISTORY thinks that could happen…
Again.
A thread
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
he's trying to do an ethnography
Replying to @ZoeSchiffer
Elon Musk is also asking for up 10 screenshots of the "most salient lines of code" from Twitter engineers 2/
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
What are the limits of the modernist and post-moderninst predicaments in understanding code? @roneglash takes us on a journey that connects code to language, music, and cybernetics.
youtu.be/tfNqOxgNRTU
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
Bumford & Charlow: Dynamic semantics with static types ift.tt/9oelaW0 #dynamicsemantics #typetheory #continuations
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
This is probably old enough that it doesn’t ring a lot of bells for people, so here: blog.cryptographyengineering…
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
Replying to @emilymbender @huggingface
One might reply: "But it wasn't that hard to build with today's technology. Someone else could do it." To this, please see #ethicsbingo square #1:
cc @KarnFort1
>>

ALT "NLP Ethics Excuse Bingo" bingo card. The squares are: If I don’t, someone else will Who are you to decide? Ethics is relative to culture There are positive uses too Ethics review is censorship Science is neutral Well, you flew to this conference People are biased too Negative outcomes are not predictable Workers there are happy for $0.05 There are no alternatives Don’t slow down progress You want to go back to candles? Ethics review is US imperialism The data was publicly accessible Stop being political CC-BY-SA Emily M. Bender & Karën Fort 2022
Chung-chieh Shan 單中杰 retweeted
🌴 New post: The only question you need to ask about education technology.
This is the first thing I do whenever I see any new edtech.
danmeyer.substack.com/p/the-…
















