Pinned Tweet
βοΈ Introducing ChainGreets π
Send daily onchain greeting across EVM network.
Deploy SC Β· ERC-20 Β· ERC-721 directly from the UI.
β
18 mainnets Β· 15 testnets
β
Verified smart contracts
β
No backend Β· No database Β· Gas only
β
Built-in analytics dashboard
Two weeks ago, we asked whether @soneium was simply weak by traditional DeFi metrics or whether we were measuring it with the wrong ones. πΏ
Todayβs announcement gives us the beginning of an answer:
π xitter.cf/soneium/status/2114635β¦
The headline will be $SONEIUM.
But the more interesting part is Tokenized IP.
Music, anime, games and other creative IP connected to onchain ownership, licensing and royalty flows with rules that humans and AI agents can query and execute.
That matters because Soneium has never really looked like a DeFi-first chain.
Its thesis is increasingly becoming clearer: entertainment, creators, fans and IP with blockchain acting as the economic and rights layer underneath.
Back in our previous analysis, the missing piece was proof:
real licensing, royalties, adoption and economic activity beyond campaigns and incentives.
Today doesnβt prove that thesis yet.
But it does make it much more concrete.
Now the interesting part begins: seeing whether Tokenized IP turns into actual usage.
πΏ Explore Soneium & its ecosystem:
chaingreets.xyz/chain?c=soneβ¦
π GSoneium Greeters πΏ
After looking at chains winding down, one question keeps coming back: Low TVL + low fees can be warning signs.
But are they enough to judge every chain?
@soneium sits around ~$5M DeFi TVL with very little chain revenue, yet still sees 300k+ daily transactions.
Weak DeFi chain? Maybe.
But Sony + @StartaleGroup increasingly seem to be building around something else:
IP. Entertainment. Gaming. Creators.
So are we using the wrong metrics, or is the thesis simply still waiting for proof? π
"Building durable revenue."
That may actually be the most interesting thing to watch on @SonicLabs now.
FeeM gives builders a way to capture up to 90% of the network fees generated through their contracts without launching their own appchain.
Good model.
Now comes the harder part: generating enough real activity to make that revenue meaningful.
Why FeeM is interesting:
User pays gas in S
β 10% goes to validators
β 90% goes into FeeM for eligible activity
β registered apps can claim the share attributed to their contracts
So builders can capture network-level value without operating their own chain.
That sits somewhere between "deploy on a shared L1/L2" and "launch an appchain".
2. The current data also keeps the story grounded.
Sonic is around:
β’ ~$17M DeFi TVL
β’ ~$147 in chain fees / 24h
β’ ~$1.9k in app revenue / 24h
β’ ~3M S distributed through FeeM cumulatively
So FeeM is real.
But at current activity levels, itβs still secondary revenue for most builders.
And thatβs why Sonic is worth watching from here.
The interesting metric isnβt just TVL or transactions.
Itβs whether real onchain usage creates enough recurring fees to support:
users β apps β builders β ecosystem
If that flywheel starts working without heavy incentives, "durable revenue" becomes more than a strategy statement.
Hi @FRN9169 you asked for it ... @Enter_Elysium Testnet is now live on @chaingreets π
Weβve added the network, deployed the GM/GN contracts and hooked it into the dashboard.
So you can now grind Elysium with:
β daily GM / GN
β 5-in-1 onchain actions
β dedicated ecosystem page
β activity tracking
Thanks for the push π
chaingreets.xyz
2. For transparency, the ChainGreets contracts deployed on Elysium Testnet are publicly verifiable onchain π
π GM contract
testnet.elysium.kinetiq.xyz/β¦
π GN contract
testnet.elysium.kinetiq.xyz/β¦
Both are already live on the Elysium explorer. π
Build. Deploy. Verify. π
π€ Made with AI
1/2 Before @LitecoinVM opens its next chapter, thereβs already quite a bit to explore on the current testnet. π
The @Superboard_ campaign is a good guided tour through the LitVM ecosystem, with quests covering a growing range of apps:
β DEXs & DeFi:
@LitDEXApp - @AddaxDEX - @Omni_Hub - @0xnothing_net - @auralaunchorg - @0xBuckyR
β More ecosystem apps: @LitVMSwap - @litgames_litvm - @MidasHandxyz - @Omni_Hub - @OnChainGm - @Infinitynamecom - @sweep_haus and many others
We went through the campaign this weekend and used the opportunity to add several of these dApps to the LitVM ecosystem page on ChainGreets.
Still testnet, still exploratory but already plenty to test before V2 expands the playground. π
chaingreets.xyz/chain?c=litvβ¦
2/2 Exploring LitVM shouldnβt be only about checking boxes. π
We just tested 0xPixel by @0xnothing_net , one of the apps featured in the current ecosystem quests.
So hereβs a small ChainGreets challenge:
π¨ Create your own pixel art on 0xPixel
π 0xnothing.xyz/0xpixel
πΈ Share it in the replies
Letβs see what the LitVM community can build.
π ChainGreets' Transparency page is live.
Following Friday's DYOR exchange with @gabup077, we put everything in one place:
β GM/GN contract addresses across supported chains
β Fee per action
β Fee collector
β How collected fees are used
β September campaign expenses ($61 USDC)
chaingreets.xyz/transparency
Still experimental. Still DYOR.
Verified means the deployed source code is publicly verified on the chain explorer. It does not mean audited or risk-free.
Read the DYOR post for more info π
Now easier to verify. π΅οΈ
π DYOR is always a good reminder, especially when connecting a wallet and signing transactions, π― agree with @gabup077
One advantage of onchain apps is that DYOR doesn't have to stop at a disclaimer.
With @chaingreets, you can actually look at what you're interacting with.
ChainGreets GM/GN interactions use public smart contracts... if we don't forget to verify/publish them.
Most supported chains currently use the same GM/GN contract pair:
πGM: 0xb691e7c374490905136b17cd34f1Ea4a3A140635
πGN: 0xAC392810e6F92ba8478eccf8a1AbAbfF76fFb6Db
Where the source is verified, you can inspect it directly on the explorer. π
π Saturday GN, Greeters! π°π·
More things to explore on @GIWA_by_Upbit this weekend.
The GIWA Testnet Exploration campaign on @Superboard_ has expanded, with several dApps and quests now available across the ecosystem.
π§ Start here:
superboard.xyz/campaigns/giwβ¦
Some ideas for your Saturday grind π
π§ @GiwaterFinance
β Trade
β Add liquidity to the pools
β‘ @OsigeExchange
β Make a trade
β Add liquidity
β Open your Profile
β Verify your wallet address
β Claim your up.id
π @AmmoraHQ
β Join the waitlist
β Complete the available missions
β Explore the Boost section for additional actions
ammora.org/waitlist
ammora.org/waitlist/boost
And thereβs more to explore through the Superboard campaign:
β @Omni_Hub
β @OnChainGm
β @Infinitynamecom
No need to rush through everything in one session.
Explore the dApps, make some real testnet interactions, try the different features and build your GIWA onchain footprint along the way. π§ͺβοΈ
And of course, your daily GIWA GM/GN + deploy is waiting on ChainGreets π
chaingreets.xyz/chain?c=giwa
Whoβs grinding GIWA this weekend? π
π€ Made with AI
π @DogeOS ChikyΕ« Testnet is now LIVE on ChainGreets!
You can now send your daily GM & GN, deploy contracts, and do the full 5-in-1 on Dogecoinβs EVM app layer.
β Ecosystem page: chaingreets.xyz/chain?c=dogeβ¦
Quick links:
β’ Faucet: faucet.testnet.dogeos.com
β’ Docs: docs.dogeos.com
β’ Explorer:
π dogeos-testnet.l2scan.co
π blockscout.testnet.dogeos.coβ¦
β’ Portal: portal.testnet.dogeos.com
Native gas token = DOGE
Chain ID: 6281971
Build your onchain footprint the easy way.
Much greet. Very activity. Wow.
2/3 Chaingreets Verified contract:
π GM
dogeos-testnet.l2scan.co/addβ¦
π GN
dogeos-testnet.l2scan.co/addβ¦
3/3 On the DogeOS ecosystem page you can already find:
β’ @OnChainGm daily GM + Deploy
β’ @Omni_Hub mint & create NFT collections
β’ @bark_swap (by @SofaLabs_org) swap & LP
All live on DogeOS ChikyΕ« Testnet.
Other apps to add to the page?
Comment π
π GM Greeters
Yesterday we looked at @megaeth :
- Huge technical capacity.
- Millions of transactions.
But still a very small onchain economy.
Today, let's look at another high-performance EVM: @monad
And the picture is very different.
Monad already has roughly:
β ~$1B DeFi TVL
β ~$670M stablecoins
β ~$25M+ daily DEX volume
β ~$13M daily perp volume
β ~5M transactions/day
So... did Monad manage to turn performance into an actual economy?
Not so fast. π§΅
π€ Made with AI
4/5 And then there's monad:native
Current structural demand mainly comes from:
β gas
β staking / network security
There isn't a Hyperliquid-style mechanism where growing application revenue mechanically creates massive token purchases.
Meanwhile, supply matters.
A major team/investor unlock starts around 24 Nov 2026, with a very large tranche relative to today's circulating float.
So the equation becomes:
TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
+
~$1B TVL
+
REAL DEFI ACTIVITY
vs.
BOT-HEAVY TRANSACTIONS
+
PORTABLE MULTICHAIN APPS
+
WEAK CHAIN-LEVEL VALUE CAPTURE
+
TOKEN EMISSIONS / UNLOCKS
Monad has clearly built more economic gravity than MegaETH.
But it hasn't yet demonstrated that this gravity is difficult to move elsewhere.
5/5 And that's probably the real Monad test.
The technology works.
Capital arrived.
Major DeFi protocols deployed.
Developers are building.
That's already much more than an empty high-TPS chain.
But the next stage can't simply be:
- more transactions
- more incentives
- more TVL
What Monad still needs to prove is:
β sticky liquidity without subsidies
β recurring human users
β native apps people specifically want
β sustainable fees
β stronger MON value capture
β a reason users/builders can't easily get elsewhere
Yesterday MegaETH showed us that performance alone doesn't create an economy.
Monad shows the next step:
Even when an economy appears, the question becomes whether it is sustainable and who actually captures its value.
Transactions alone don't make a sustainable blockchain.
That's the question we're exploring across ChainGreets. π
Explore chains, activity & onchain tools:
chaingreets.xyz
π DYOR is always a good reminder, especially when connecting a wallet and signing transactions, π― agree with @gabup077
One advantage of onchain apps is that DYOR doesn't have to stop at a disclaimer.
With @chaingreets, you can actually look at what you're interacting with.
ChainGreets GM/GN interactions use public smart contracts... if we don't forget to verify/publish them.
Most supported chains currently use the same GM/GN contract pair:
πGM: 0xb691e7c374490905136b17cd34f1Ea4a3A140635
πGN: 0xAC392810e6F92ba8478eccf8a1AbAbfF76fFb6Db
Where the source is verified, you can inspect it directly on the explorer. π
gINK gSoneium gBase
Daily gm with @chaingreets
Keep gm/gn
Note: This is an experimental test project β use at your own risk, especially on mainnets. Always verify transactions before signing, Pls DYOR...
5. Some networks use different deployments.
@arc Mainnet π
πGM
explorer.arc.io/address/0xa5β¦
πGN
explorer.arc.io/address/0x69β¦
Another reason to always check the network + contract address before signing.
π€ Made with AI
6. Your wallet gives you another layer of information too:
β network
β contract address
β function called
β value sent
β token approvals, when applicable
ChainGreets remains an experimental community project.
So yes: DYOR. π«‘
But onchain, DYOR can actually mean:
- Check the address.
- Read the transaction.
- Inspect the contract.
- Verify what you're signing. βοΈπ
Weβll also add a dedicated Transparency page to the ChainGreets docs soon, with contract addresses and direct explorer links for supported networks.
















