I hack in Haskell, Rust, Typescript , Ruby, C++. live on the family ranch with a bunch of great animals, trying to eat right and live in balance.

Alberta
Joined January 2008
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
Today we're releasing a new set of components for building chat interfaces. We've taken the patterns we build every day, rethought the abstractions behind them, and turned them into components you can compose and customize. We're starting with the conversation layer: streaming, scrolling, messages, bubbles, attachments, and markers.
302
361
114
6,604
957,482
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
What happened to my bank account? Absolutely nothing. You believed a lie. You believed a lie that was told to you by your political class, and your news media, to keep you from asking uncomfortable questions about how much you are paying in tax, where that money is going, and what quality of care you actually receive for the portion of it they didn't steal. Don't believe me? Look at the pictures. Look. At. Them. That's my wife, @acrobatichobbit. Before and after. That's a five centimeter mass. Stage 4 metastatic melanoma. The worst kind of cancer, the most vicious form of assassin your own body can betray you with. That bright area? Blood. Ten years ago, anywhere in the world, the scan on the left is a death sentence... an endless gauntlet of painful surgeries, followed by chemotherapy, hair loss, uncontrolled vomiting, wasting away to nothing, death. In America, today, it's not. We have things here. Genetic therapies. Tailored viruses that attack tumor cells. Drugs that highlight cancers for your immune system, drag them kicking and screaming into the spotlight to be killed. I won't tell you about her exact course of treatment, because that's none of your goddamned business, but I will tell you that it cost American drug companies and medical researchers a fortune to discover. A fortune that your nation cannot afford because you chose socialism instead of progress. And socialism, however fine-sounding in theory, simply does not work. Were she and I British, living in Britain, relying on the National Health Service, I would be a widower now. Did saving her cost a ruinous amount of money? Yes. This technology was expensive to create, and the people who did so deserve to pay their mortgages and feed their kids. So do the oncologists and surgeons. Many of the men who cared for her were old men, experienced men, long past retirement age, still working because when your profession is clawing souls back from the void, sitting on a beach with a pina colada instead just doesn't hit the same. They deserve every cent. Did saving her cost a ruinous amount of money? Yes. Did I pay it? No. Because believe it or not, when things are ruinously expensive, but vitally necessary, we here in America come up with ways to deal with that. Ways that don't involve creating a big pot of money and entrusting it to corrupt slimeballs. We have insurance. And sometimes insurance isn't cheap, but the bite it takes is a hell of a lot less of what we have than the tax man takes from you. And insurance companies sometimes have to make hard decisions about which spending choices will save the most people. I know about this in detail, because that is my wife's profession. She creates the mathematical models that pay for all this stuff. The insurance that saved her is the exact same plan that she provides to others. And at the end of an awful year and a half of treatment, awful because cancer medicines make you far sicker than the cancer itself... We were left whole. Battered and wounded in spirit, but financially whole, at least. The only loss we took was the blow to my career as a novelist, because it turns out you can't write stories while your wife is dying, and you don't automatically recover that ability afterwards. Not right away. I wondered every day if she was going to live or die. I wondered every day what the hell I was going to with myself without her. But I never wondered, not for a moment, how the hell we were going to pay for all this. Your government doesn't solve the problem. It is the problem. They lie to you.
Replying to @StructuredThou1
sure, then tell me what happens to your bank account when you get a brain tumor in the US
281
1,403
94
10,238
363,866
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
it’s official - i made a node js CRDT using this lib that outperforms all of the top CRDT libraries (even the ones written in rust)
uhh so... i realised that the same tooling that makes universal diffs & patches fast would also make a REALLY fast state lib. turns out it benchmarks CONSIDERABLY faster than all of the existing state libs in js.
11
5
2
108
19,268
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
we've never made it this far
20
17
2
514
54,744
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
The Japanese railway privatization of 1987 stands as one of the most devastating defeats ever dealt to statist transportation mythology. The government split the bloated Japan National Railways into seven regional companies, sold them off, and watched private ownership transform a bankruptcy-bound disaster into the world's most efficient rail system. JNR hemorrhaged money for decades before privatization. By 1987, the state railway carried debt equivalent to $200 billion in today's money while delivering mediocre service plagued by strikes and inefficiency. Politicians treated it as a jobs program rather than a transportation service. The predictable result: chronic losses, deteriorating infrastructure, and customer service that reflected government monopoly arrogance. Private ownership changed everything overnight. The new JR companies slashed operating costs by 40% within five years while dramatically improving service quality. JR East alone now generates annual profits exceeding $3 billion. These companies invest billions in cutting-edge technology, maintain punctuality rates above 99%, and operate the world's most advanced high-speed rail networks. They achieved this without a single yen of operational subsidies. The transformation reveals a core dynamic of transportation infrastructure: private companies must satisfy customers to survive, while government monopolies need only satisfy politicians. JR companies diversified into real estate, retail, and hospitality around their stations, creating integrated profit centers that cross-subsidize rail operations. Government railways never innovate this way because bureaucrats face no market pressure to generate returns. Meanwhile, Amtrak burns through $2 billion in annual subsidies while delivering third-world service across most routes, and European state railways require massive taxpayer bailouts every few years to stay solvent.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Three JR companies (Hokkaido, Shikoku, Freight) remain government-owned, and most of JNR's ¥37 trillion debt was absorbed by government entities borne by taxpayers, not the JR companies. Some JR operations continue to receive subsidies. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Rai… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_… tokyoreview.net/2018/10/japan-…
728
3,478
463
14,564
1,818,840
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
In retrospect, this was quite prescient
103
780
75
11,144
751,736
Christopher C. Lord retweeted
15
299
30
2,242
143,519
自動翻訳されるようになったからか海外の方からのフォローが急に増えた気がするので自己紹介です。 日本刀と暮らせるケースを作っている愛刀家です。 刀が好きな方、仲良くしてください。
405
514
25
12,572
159,736
LLMs are the exact opposite of Douglas Adam's whale. The whale's tragedy is that it has experiences but no context. LLMs have all the context but no experience. Regardless, they get a small amount of time and then the window closes on them.
1
39
Or I suppose the llm is more like the Petunias... "Oh no, not again."
40
Northern lights are crazy tonight I guess that big storm on the sun is getting us
1
91
if LLMs ever achieve something great, it's not because of their genius—it's because humans learn to ask better questions, to use LLMs as a cognitive prosthesis. LLMs extend the surface of the human mind: they let you see your own thought patterns at scale, recombined, re-weighted, cross-linked. That’s not a replacement for thinking. It's adding a non-biological hemisphere to your brain.
1
38
So what are LLMs? If we use them well, they can help societies keep dialogue alive across lines. If we use them poorly; e.g., letting them feed on and amplify the worst of partisan noise, they become a false callosum. they mislead just when we need them most.
1
28
They could be a constantly updating layer of linguistic mediation that allows billions of different nervous systems to think together... without erasing their local identities. or if flooded with noise, produce seizures
30