
#1 Columbo Fan • Hatsune Miku Evangelist • 27 • Developer (Websites, Software, Games) also I'm learning the Piano!
Washington, DC
Joined November 2009
- Tweets53.8K
- Following575
- Followers1.4K
- Likes414K
Chris retweeted
more clickbait fearmongering slop from dexerto, this does not apply to "public servers" this applies to servers in the Discovery program, y'know... servers that need to meet THESE requirements AND apply for it lol
Discord will soon make public server messages searchable on Google
The feature will be enabled by default for US adults, but users can opt out in their privacy settings
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Missing context: only applies to messages posted after the update, in public channels of discoverable servers.
No private servers or DMs.
Indexed messages won’t show usernames or avatars.
Admins can opt out entire servers; users can opt out their own messages.
discord.com/blog/making-co…
Chris retweeted
Dudes will be like, I could vibe code steam in a week and then not vibe code steam
It's really sad that the games industry is drained by a 30% tax on gross revenue.
You could vibe code a Steam alternative in a week. Cloudflare egress is basically free.
The industry is in desperate need of a distribution platform that allows developers to keep their revenue.
Networks effects and the fanatic obsession with "muh Steam library" will make this very difficul.
But if devs could actually keep their earnings, we'd have a greater selection of better games and far more financial success stories.
Chris retweeted
Like any other consumer, I want labels for the things I care about. That is neither ridiculous nor intrusive. Obviously, if I thought it was a dogmatic purity test, I would not ask for it. Unlike the analogies in this reply, I have never asked for - nor has Steam ever required - a disclosure of Hawaiian holidays, car purchases, political affiliation, or whom a dev dated.
As part of my consumer purchasing decisions, I am interested in supporting the preservation of skilled human labor. For example, I bought Cuphead because I wanted to support hand-drawn animation. I did not expect to enjoy the game (and didn't). I might similarly buy a game because they coded the engine from scratch instead of using an off-the-shelf one.
I have no independent interest in supporting AI use for game development. That doesn't mean I wouldn't buy a game made with AI, it just means I wouldn't go out of my way to support the developer. Having a clear label (as opposed to, say, a community tag, which is not a warrant from the developer) lets me know what I'm supporting. If I don't have it, I can try to get the information another way, but it is not always possible.
Although replies (like the one highlighted here) dismiss the analogy for reasons that are unclear to me, it really is the same idea as buying local, organic food because you want to preserve a certain type of agriculture: I cannot reliably tell the difference between an organic apple and an inorganic one. I am not purchasing an organic apple because I think the organic apple tastes better. I am purchasing it because I am trying to support a particular way of life that I know is more costly for the producer.
Similarly, I do not demand anyone else buys organic. I do not myself exclusively buy organic. It's a decision I like to be able to make as a consumer, so I can allocate some portion of my money to supporting things that matter to me.
As always, if not enough other consumers want to know the things I want to know, sucks to be me, and it will be unlikely that labels will contain that information. But if a large number do, then you get either a voluntary label, or involuntary labeling requirement.
This is not abnormal, and it's good, actually.
Replying to @cmuratori
Ridiculous analogy, and intrusive demand. Do we also have to disclose the energy mix that has gone into creating a software or rendering a Pixar movie? 70% gas 20% coal 10% nuclear?
Do we have to disclose that as a programmer we eat meat? That you take holidays in Hawaii? That you drive x car? That you voted x president in 1998? That you had a bad experience with an ex?
The only reason some want this, is to enforce a dogmatic purity test to segment the market & artificially protect their corner with an ideological / religious moat, now that the technological & legal ones have fallen.
Chris retweeted
She had her first child while knowing she was facing a fraud trial that would likely send her to prison and had her second child after she’d already been convicted.
This is her choice! Mothers can be fraudsters too…
We need to emotionally gatekeep game dev by bringing back the word “posers” for ai slop devs
Steam Week in Review: Steam Next Fest has over 8,000 demos, as worthless vibe coded slop levels up pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/…
Chris retweeted
Another cool thing ruined by AI slop.
Steam Week in Review: Steam Next Fest has over 8,000 demos, as worthless vibe coded slop levels up pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/…
Chris retweeted
Reminder that an anonymous Theranos employee discussed the whole fraud (without naming the company) on a popular subreddit years before the WSJ broke the story
Chris retweeted
The gym clothing discourse is just so funny like at what point did we decide men have become incapable of glimpsing a nice ass and going “yeah, nice ass” in their heads and then going on with their day lmao
![[archer] (@archer_uwu) profile picture](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1851938840916664320/ocWeeHC2_400x400.jpg)
![Image from [archer] (@archer_uwu)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HVqaFxHXUAE7Jpk.png?name=small&format=webp)






































