I am sorry, as much the line items are correct, it is very misleading. For comparison purposes I created an exact infographic for Zambia which has higher taxes and fees, yet they are still able to offer lower data costs.
How much do taxes contribute to the cost of staying connected in Zimbabwe?
Industry data shows telecoms operators carry an estimated government tax burden of around 55%.
Breakdown ➡️ newzwire.live/how-taxes-and-…
Admiral retweeted
How much do taxes contribute to the cost of staying connected in Zimbabwe?
Industry data shows telecoms operators carry an estimated government tax burden of around 55%.
Breakdown ➡️ newzwire.live/how-taxes-and-…
Sentinels of the Turf 🏇🏿: Inside Sub-Saharan Africa’s Solitary Racing Duopoly
Between the Mediterranean sands of Cairo and the historic racing hubs of Johannesburg, the vast mainland expanse of Sub-Saharan Africa features only two active bastions of thoroughbred horse racing: the Jockey Club of Kenya (@jockeyclubke) in Nairobi, Kenya 🇰🇪 and the Mashonaland Turf Club (@ClubMashonaland) in Harare, Zimbabwe 🇿🇼.
While the broader African continent boasts highly developed turf cultures in the extreme south, the Mediterranean north of Morocco, and the fanatical island circuits of Mauritius, it is at Ngong and Borrowdale Park where the purebred Anglo-centric racing tradition has uniquely survived on the mainland. Rooted in late 19th-century colonial ambition, both institutions have successfully evolved from exclusive expatriate social rituals into enduring, resilient symbols of national sporting heritage.
The Jockey Club of Kenya: East Africa’s Turf Guardian
The story of Kenyan racing is a masterclass in keeping a niche, highly demanding sport alive against changing geopolitical and economic tides. It remains the solitary thoroughbred racing authority operating in all of East and Central Africa.
• Colonial Foundations: Horse racing formally began in Kenya in 1904 at Kariokor, near Nairobi's present-day center, organized under the East African Turf Club. Driven by prominent colonial figures like pioneer Lord Thomas Delamere, "Nairobi Race Week" rapidly became the premier event on the East African social calendar. In 1920, the organization officially rebranded as the Jockey Club of Kenya, introducing foundational milestones—most notably the Kenya Derby, which was first run in 1914 and remains the jewel of Kenyan thoroughbred racing.
• The Relocation to Ngong: To accommodate growing urban development and standard infrastructure needs, the club opened Ngong Racecourse in 1954, abandoning the old track at Kariokor. Purpose-built to echo the design elements of the UK's Ascot, the 2,400-meter turf track features a testing six-furlong straightaway.
• Track Layout and Turf Conditions: Ngong is a right-handed turf track situated at an altitude of nearly 6,000 feet, which adds a unique cardiovascular challenge for competing horses. The kikuyu grass surface provides a thick, resilient cushion, though it can become demanding and heavy during the Kenyan rainy seasons. Jockeys must navigate a long, sweeping home turn before hitting the uphill finish on the straightaway.
• Post-Independence Resilience: Following Kenya's independence in 1963, the Jockey Club transitioned from a colonial enclave into a national institution. As local tracks in Eldoret, Nakuru, and Limuru eventually closed due to shifting economics, Ngong stood alone. Today, it hosts bi-weekly Sunday meetings, relying on a dedicated community of local owners, trainers, and jockeys to keep the thoroughbred studbook alive in the region. Legendary local racing figures, such as the late trainer Patsy Sercombe—who dominated the trainer championships for decades—and veteran jockeys like Lesly Sercombe, have been instrumental in maintaining the competitive standards of the local circuit.
The Mashonaland Turf Club: The Heartbeat of Zimbabwean Racing
Further south, the Mashonaland Turf Club (MTC) carved out a similarly dominant regional footprint, serving as the only active thoroughbred track in mainland Southern Africa outside of South Africa's borders.
• Early Genesis: Founded on January 4, 1892, under its first president, Dr. Leander Starr Jameson, the MTC hosted its inaugural race meeting on Boxing Day of that year on land allocated by Cecil Rhodes in the Belvedere area. Early racing was defined by sheer grit; in 1897, the winner of the Mashonaland Handicap was a famous horse named Recondite, who had walked all the way from Johannesburg just to compete—a stark contrast to the modern transport networks enjoyed by South African racing today.
• The Shift to Borrowdale Park: In 1958, the MTC moved its operations to its current, iconic home: Borrowdale Park Racecourse in northern Harare. By the 1970s, the Zimbabwean racing industry reached its absolute peak, boasting over 600 mares at stud and 400 horses actively in training, feeding a highly lucrative domestic market.
• Track Layout and Turf Conditions: Borrowdale Park is a massive, flat, right-handed turf circuit measuring roughly 2,700 meters in circumference. It features an incredibly wide, 1,200-meter straight, allowing for large, visually spectacular fields to sprint without immediate crowding. The track is renowned for its excellent drainage and high-quality turf, which generally stays fast and true, mirroring the elite track standards found in neighboring South Africa.
• Weathering Economic Storms: At the turn of the 21st century, sweeping land reform programs led to the closing of nearly all local stud farms, drastically decimating the domestic horse population and collapsing traditional betting revenues. Yet, unlike the community-funded model in Kenya, the MTC preserved its core events—including the Castle Tankard, the oldest sponsored horse race in the country—by integrating into South African racing and simulcast betting systems. This financial lifeline preserved a stage for historic local racing icons like trainer Bridget Stidolph and legendary horses like Ipi Tombe, a Zimbabwean-bred filly who conquered Borrowdale Park before going on to win the Durban July and the Dubai Duty Free.
The Continental Context: A Unique Duopoly
When placed against the wider African landscape, the achievement of these two tracks becomes clear. They do not share the mainstream commercial lottery backing seen in the vibrant, indigenous cavalry-based circuits of West Africa (like Nigeria and Senegal), nor do they have the deep state-sponsored infrastructure of Morocco or the seamless import pipelines of Mauritius.
By maintaining strict international thoroughbred studbook standards without the massive financial backing found at either end of the continent, Ngong and Borrowdale Park remain remarkable, solitary sentinels of the turf.
Admiral retweeted
It’s estimated that during the glory days of the MDC , they had 2 shortwave radio stations, one in UK and one in USA broadcasting to Zimbabwe, numerous websites and hundreds of NGOs that pumped over half a billion in USD.
They had the kind of funding that could thrash Mugabe like they did in Referendum and 2008 election. Despite not having military backing they forced a GNU.
The cash eventually ran out. The crumbs left where a scramble for fellowships , weird election briefcase advocacy groups and access to a passionate diaspora who would find invisible bulletproof cars and whilst underfund “vote protections”.
The war then moved ONLINE where the Zanu PF targets are way too hard for these lazy cashtivists. They know where the Army general stays in the Brooke. They know the location of every First Childs money laundry fake business in Zimbabwe… nope. They prefer fighting other pro”democracy” “handles”. Who loved the dear leader more, citizens showing positive sides to their already shitty existence.
Citizen : “I think Pizza inn is the best pizza in the world.
Them: Simbisa is a looting blah blah.
We can’t have a shitty life and enjoy a hard earned pizza anymore. It doesn’t fit their asylum handlers narrative.
Yes we have a lot of problems as a nation. Every nation does. Poor governance. Dynastic politics. Corruption. Poor service delivery. Nepotism, sexism. Tribalism. Poor infrastructure. El Niño. The list doesn’t end. But even in a refugee camp, people get pregnant.
we have a unique ability to totally paint our own homes as Mogadishu, yet Somalians don’t paint the actual Mogadishu as bad as we do for crumbs.
NdezveBasa. We can’t prefix and suffix every fucking post to please these cashtivists. We have a life to live for better or worse.
Quote tweet that.
Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.
Admiral retweeted
Part of the Zimbabwe - India Africa Tech & Entrepreneurship Summit 2026 Series.
🎙️ @rufarogz sits down with Vusi Ndebele, a technologist, entrepreneur, and Co-Founder & CEO of Paynow Zimbabwe.
Insights on digital payments and the future of FinTech.
youtube.com/live/V__2rYjV0BY…
Admiral retweeted
Replying to @croc_mar
Thank you for the insightful analysis, Admiral. Very interesting and insightful. We appreciate your support for Friday Drinks.
Admiral retweeted
Part of the Zimbabwe - India Africa Tech & Entrepreneurship Summit 2026 Series.
In this episode, @rufarogz is joined by Dr. @BusisaMoyo, Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Investment and Development Agency @zidainvest
Watch 🔗 youtube.com/live/2zhtq-LmnYI…
Tinashe turns good news into a risk assessment. Rufaro turns a crisis into an investment thesis. Ranga turns either discussion into a cabinet meeting.
That’s ZFN Friday Drinks.
It’s one of my favourite Zimbabwean shows. After watching their discussions on infrastructure, monetary policy and economic growth, I think three men who spend so much time examining the economy can survive a little examination themselves.
Their strengths and their blind spots often come from the same place.
Start with Tinashe, whose economic forecast is permanently cloudy. If Zimbabwe discovered a mountain of gold tomorrow, he would probably ask about the opportunity cost, the environmental damage and the likelihood of the mountain being stolen by Tuesday.
Fair questions. Zimbabwe has taught us to read the fine print on good news.
But sometimes a positive development seems to need three audits and a defence lawyer before Tinashe will acknowledge it. The danger is becoming so skilled at predicting disappointment that improvement starts to look like an inconvenience to your argument.
His moderation has a similar edge. In the government debate, Ranga tried to explain why effectiveness and purpose mattered more to him than a “big” or “small” label. Tinashe wanted the box filled in immediately.
That pressure can expose an evasive answer. It can also prevent a thoughtful answer from being completed.
So, Tinashe: what measurable improvement would persuade you that Zimbabwe is making progress? Name the indicators in advance. Pessimism needs a test it can fail.
Then there’s Rufaro, who can find an opportunity inside a Zimbabwean policy statement. Some of us are still checking whether it contradicts the one issued last Thursday.
But at his most doctrinaire, Rufaro makes markets sound like a universal adapter. Whatever the problem, somehow the plug fits.
Take healthcare. How does his preferred system serve a patient who cannot pay, or a community investors cannot profitably serve? What arrangement closes that gap, and who funds it?
Those questions deserve the same attention as the investment opportunities. That is where a philosophy earns its keep.
And the evidence needs to keep pace with the confidence. In the climate discussion, broad claims about failed predictions needed the actual forecasts, their timeframes and the results set alongside them.
Scepticism should be equally demanding when a claim supports your worldview and when it challenges it.
Rufaro, occasionally let your own conclusions sit the examination.
Ranga is the minister without a ministry. Give him uninterrupted airtime and he might announce a national development plan before the next drinks break.
While Tinashe is investigating whether the economy will collapse and Rufaro is identifying the investment opportunity inside the rubble, Ranga wants to know whether people can afford a hospital visit.
He keeps bringing the conversation back to the people who are supposed to benefit from all this economic activity.
But Minister, with respect, please table the numbers.
Ranga showed he can get practical in the infrastructure discussion, identifying audited accounts, stronger governance and reliable revenue as conditions for municipal borrowing.
I want that same precision when he argues for government’s responsibility to lift people out of poverty. Choose one intervention. What would it cost? Who would deliver it? And what safeguards would prevent it from becoming another politically connected feeding trough?
The standard should be as demanding as the one applied to the others’ market arguments.
Compassion needs an implementation plan. Otherwise, we have another good speech and the same hospital queue.
Tinashe turns good news into a risk assessment. Rufaro turns a crisis into an investment thesis. Ranga turns either discussion into a cabinet meeting.
That’s ZFN Friday Drinks.
It’s one of my favourite Zimbabwean shows. After watching their discussions on infrastructure, monetary policy and economic growth, I think three men who spend so much time examining the economy can survive a little examination themselves.
Their strengths and their blind spots often come from the same place.
Start with Tinashe, whose economic forecast is permanently cloudy. If Zimbabwe discovered a mountain of gold tomorrow, he would probably ask about the opportunity cost, the environmental damage and the likelihood of the mountain being stolen by Tuesday.
Fair questions. Zimbabwe has taught us to read the fine print on good news.
But sometimes a positive development seems to need three audits and a defence lawyer before Tinashe will acknowledge it. The danger is becoming so skilled at predicting disappointment that improvement starts to look like an inconvenience to your argument.
His moderation has a similar edge. In the government debate, Ranga tried to explain why effectiveness and purpose mattered more to him than a “big” or “small” label. Tinashe wanted the box filled in immediately.
That pressure can expose an evasive answer. It can also prevent a thoughtful answer from being completed.
So, Tinashe: what measurable improvement would persuade you that Zimbabwe is making progress? Name the indicators in advance. Pessimism needs a test it can fail.
Then there’s Rufaro, who can find an opportunity inside a Zimbabwean policy statement. Some of us are still checking whether it contradicts the one issued last Thursday.
But at his most doctrinaire, Rufaro makes markets sound like a universal adapter. Whatever the problem, somehow the plug fits.
Take healthcare. How does his preferred system serve a patient who cannot pay, or a community investors cannot profitably serve? What arrangement closes that gap, and who funds it?
Those questions deserve the same attention as the investment opportunities. That is where a philosophy earns its keep.
And the evidence needs to keep pace with the confidence. In the climate discussion, broad claims about failed predictions needed the actual forecasts, their timeframes and the results set alongside them.
Scepticism should be equally demanding when a claim supports your worldview and when it challenges it.
Rufaro, occasionally let your own conclusions sit the examination.
Ranga is the minister without a ministry. Give him uninterrupted airtime and he might announce a national development plan before the next drinks break.
While Tinashe is investigating whether the economy will collapse and Rufaro is identifying the investment opportunity inside the rubble, Ranga wants to know whether people can afford a hospital visit.
He keeps bringing the conversation back to the people who are supposed to benefit from all this economic activity.
But Minister, with respect, please table the numbers.
Ranga showed he can get practical in the infrastructure discussion, identifying audited accounts, stronger governance and reliable revenue as conditions for municipal borrowing.
I want that same precision when he argues for government’s responsibility to lift people out of poverty. Choose one intervention. What would it cost? Who would deliver it? And what safeguards would prevent it from becoming another politically connected feeding trough?
The standard should be as demanding as the one applied to the others’ market arguments.
Compassion needs an implementation plan. Otherwise, we have another good speech and the same hospital queue.
@fridaydrinks_ @rufarogz @baba_nyenyedzi @dziya_mya @ZfnCapital
Admiral retweeted
How I make my money. Follow me for more tips😀
Replying to @EngineerBaeMich
You were mentioned pane imwe post uchinzi une undisputed source of income ka iwe
Admiral retweeted
Last week in Cologne I showed how you can use the GitHub Copilot App and Foundry to build an agent you can deploy across Teams, Outlook or an app of your choice.
I also showed how you can integrate our new Decision 1 model for intent classification. I'm interested in agents that can recognise intent and then take action independetly if they decide they can be helpful, so this was fun to show!
Admiral retweeted
Blanket Mine Limited has just paid a US$2,5 million dividend to the Gwanda Community Share Ownership Trust bringing total distributions to the trust in the past decade to almost US$20 million. I would suggest that money gets channeled to building a new bridge across Mtshabezi river.






















