24) No, “debunkers” didn’t manipulate the shockwave VFX Recently, some very confused #MH370x individuals tried to argue that we, ”the debunkers”, somehow were able to retroactively re-insert edited versions of the Pyromania VFX into various online sources in order to debunk the two hoax videos. It really doesn’t get more silly than this, so let’s see why this is bullshit. a) The argument is there is a match between the videos and the VFX (an astonishing admission, keep this in mind), but the match is forced through deceptive editing of the VFX by “us”. The VFX version available now is thus different from older versions which don’t match..... b) It is argued that for the satellite video zap frame, an “inserted shape” or “satellite shape” was deceptively edited in to force the match. The details in question are primarily dots at the 12 o’clock position above the zap, but also the features on the left and right of the flames. c) From the entire VFX it is beyond obvious that the so-called satellite shape is in fact small particles on the surface underneath the flames being illuminated by the flames, as well as what appears to be duct tape to the left and right likely hiding the ignition. d) In the frames used for the hoax videos, these particles are still poorly lit by the yet to completely combust flames. Later on when the flames are brighter, the same particles are much more visible, but they are clearly the same. It is obvious that in lowering the quality of the VFX, the less illuminated frames would lose these details first. e) To make the argument, the MH370x folks have compared many available versions of the VFX, arguing the “oRiGiNaL” version does not have these dots and other features. However these comparisons are made on often very low-quality versions of the VFX. They point to the dots missing in the first frames in these versions as evidence, when that is perfectly explained by d). f) However more importantly, even in lower quality versions, the dots of the satellite shape are visible, for example in a december 2014 YouTube upload (youtube.com/watch?v=kKXkIyhP…) and a 2007 GettysImages upload (gettyimages.co.uk/detail/vid…). g) Proponents argue, baselessly and without evidence, that dates, like the 2007 Getty upload, can be changed arbitrarily, whenever an upload date doesn’t suit them, displaying the dishonesty. h) The argument would also mean a debunker would have the capabilities to not only alter the VFX without even the creator being able to spot it, but also re-inserting the edited version on multiple different platforms, media and channels, many making it appear as if the upload preceded MH370. That is tinfoil conspiracy nonsense, not something approaching reality. i) Making things more confusing is the fact that some of these folks readily acknowledge the match between Shockwave VFX and the thermal video, which really begs the question why there is even a need for editing just the satellite zap frame? Make it make sense? j) Given that they acknowledged the match, and their argument is nonsense, I guess the only conclusion is that the videos are fake, amirite? 🤣 next