
Director, @thelandcenter | Column: @wngdotorg | Author | Newsletter: https://xitter.cf/t.co/mejmKIDb8V. @csbible Ambassador | PhD student @sebts
Fort Worth, TX
Joined January 2010
- Tweets84.6K
- Following8.2K
- Followers29.9K
- Likes158K
Pinned Tweet
If you are planning your Advent reading, my book The Characters of Christmas is on sale at Amazon for less than $10. And 50% off if you buy two: link.amazon/B0aKQGrDy
I'm one of those pesky evangelicals who think Genesis is literal. I believe humans are not animals, but God's special creation, made in his image (Genesis 1:26; 27), crowned with glory and honor (Psalm 8), knit with care in every womb (Psalm 139). The sentiment below shows what happens when humans reject Genesis' language of the imago Dei in favor of sinful racial and tribal prejudices. But while sentiments like the one below are dismaying, I believe that one day every nation, tribe, and tongue will gather in the New Jerusalem and praise the Creator (Rev 7).
Humans are a pack animal.
This may be hard to understand if you are evangelical and think the book of genesis is literal rather than allegorical, but humans are a pack animal.
What this means is that the human desire for the acceptance and support of a tribe is as fundamental as the desire for food, for air, for water, for sex, for sunlight, for love.
If you tell young men that they cannot have a tribe, they're not going to accept that.
Ever.
Especially if you tell that only to the young men of one tribe in particular. They're going to wonder why everybody gets to have a tribe and they don't.
And they're eventually going to decide that you are the enemy.
Because you are. Anyone who stands between young men and what they need for a healthy, fulfilled life is their enemy.
That includes you.
And if you manage to convince them that god doesn't want them to have a tribe, it will also include god.
The more you push back against their healthy and natural desire for a tribe, a homeland, and a birthright, the more they will hate you, and the more exclusive their definition of that tribe will become.
There is no way you can stop this. The only thing you can control is how far they have to go, how radical they have to become, in order to get it.
Because this can go all the way from enforcing immigration law, and shutting down corrupt visa programs right now, to gangs of young White men in balaclavas with Ar15s going door to door ten years from now.
We have to do something about the 14th amendment. I don't care if that makes you uncomfortable or unhappy. It's not a choice. The constitution exists to serve Americans, not the other way around. If that sentence confuses you, read the first paragraph of the constitution.
If we do not, young men of the future, the same little boys who are being radicalized right now by your malicious indifference, will treat a piece of paper that says they cannot have a homeland the way they would treat a piece of paper that says that can't eat food, or a piece of paper that says they can't own a home, or have a wife and children.
You may think that you offer them a tribe in the form of the universal kingdom of god, the community of all believers, but that's just a word game and you know it, which is why you are so defensive about the whole thing.
Where was the universal community of believers when these young men needed help? When they needed not just the surface appearance of a tribe, but someone to do the things that tribes actually do for younger generations they care about?
The pack serves a concrete set of functions in the life cycle of the human species, and you cannot perform those functions with a cardboard cutout.
Young men are sick of religion that offers them responsibilities with no rights, lectures with no help, demands with no love or empathy.
It's odd, in a way ironic, that, I, the man of zero faith, should have to be the one standing here telling self-styled religious leaders how they failed both their people and their god.
But having no faith does give me one advantage. It frees me from the delusion that Jesus is a puppet that I can pull out of my pocket, slip over my right hand, move his mouth and make him say what I want.
I used to wonder, as a child, what the phrase "taking the name of the lord in vain" actually meant.
But I no longer wonder, because when I became a man, I looked around me and saw all these people who talk to god and somehow get told exactly what they want to hear.
Then I understood that the key phrase here wasn't "in vain". It was "taking". Taking the name of god and using it as a tool for one's own goals.
Joel, here, is sad that his friend is getting sent home. This personally inconveniences both him and his friend, which effects Joel in a way that young men being denied their birthright does not.
So he finds an interpretation of scripture that says that god wants him, Joel Berry, to get his way, and that god wants all the young men who want a homeland and a birthright to go get fucked.
I'm not terribly impressed.
Daniel Darling retweeted
Friends, in just two days, Christians were murdered on two continents.
On Friday, gunmen opened fire on a funeral at St. George’s Greek Orthodox Church in Karak, Jordan, and killed nine people. On Saturday, armed men attacked Orthodox churches and homes in Oromia, Ethiopia, and killed more than forty.
These are not statistics. They are our brothers and sisters, members of the mystical Body of Christ. When Saul set out to destroy the Church, the risen Jesus asked him, “Why are you persecuting me?” The Lord is still being persecuted in these victims of anti-Christian violence.
Christianity is by far the most persecuted religion in the world today. Those of us who worship in comfort have to ask what the deaths of these martyrs demand of us. At the very least, they demand that we pray for them, learn their names, press our leaders to act, and refuse to look away.
The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.
Daniel Darling retweeted
Have you ever thought of having a ministry of conversation? Francos Schaeffer said, “if I have only one hour with someone, I will spend the first 55 min asking questions…then the last 5 min I will share something of the truth”
This is helpful. The individual Christian voter has the right to set their own voting parameters in ways the state cannot. Considering a candidate's overall worldview and character is proper, along with considering how they'd vote on certain policy positions.
I'm a Baptist for whom religious liberty matters greatly. But does supporting religious liberty mean voters cannot take a candidate's religious worldview into account when deciding whether to vote for them? No. With Islam's growing influence, I have a new column at @realDailyWire that helps clarify how religion factors into whether a candidate is fit to serve. dailywire.com/news/the-polit…
This is excellent from @jaredcornutt for @TGC: "You’re a young man pursuing pastoral ministry, you need to understand this: You’ll sit with people old enough to be your grandparents."
thegospelcoalition.org/artic…
Christians, be discerning with your political content. Not everything on the Right is right.
The madness is spreading. theblaze.com/news/blaze-medi…
Good
More than 40 Nebraska coaches and athletes are speaking out against online sports betting and urging Nebraska voters to reject Initiatives 440 and 441.
“Save Nebraska Sports” released a letter signed by 45 Nebraska coaches and athletes opposed to the initiatives, including 3x national champion football coach Tom Osborne, longtime assistant football coach Ron Brown, head wrestling coach Mark Manning, former NFL running back Roy Helu Jr., former quarterback and college football coach Turner Gill, All-American volleyball player Gina (Mancuso) Prososki, and Nebraska baseball players Ryan Harahill, Will Jesske, Chase Olson, and Tucker Timmerman, among others.
“These groups do not care about our athletes, our traditions, or Nebraska families. They see our state as another market and every phone as another casino,” the letter states.
I had a great time yesterday talking to my friend and colleague about this important new book
Blake McKinney's newest book focuses on the German and international Protestant church from 1933 to 1937, as the Nazi Party began to establish itself. swbts.edu/news/mckinneys-ger…
Daniel Darling retweeted
Heartbreaking: An attack on church in Jordan killed at least 6 and injured 28. Jordan has long been a safe haven for Christians.
King Abdullah condemned attack as terrorism and said it will be met "with the harshest retaliation."
Praying for the victims, their families, and all Jordanians.
al-monitor.com/originals/202…
Daniel Darling retweeted
STRONG OPINION: God is never late. Twists and turns along the way are a feature of His providence.
Daniel Darling retweeted
Can a Baptist church be beautifully liturgical? Come and find out on November 5 through a Q&A with Marc Brown and Madison Grace.
Twitter is not real life, tell your friends.
.@EconUS/@YouGovAmerica:
In the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, who do you sympathize with more?
Registered voters
🇺🇦 66%
🇷🇺 3%
Dem
🇺🇦 82%
🇷🇺 1%
GOP
🇺🇦 52%
🇷🇺 4%
Ind
🇺🇦 64%
🇷🇺 4%
Lib
🇺🇦 88%
🇷🇺 1%
Mod
🇺🇦 65%
🇷🇺 2%
Con
🇺🇦 52%
🇷🇺 6%
MAGA
🇺🇦 50%
🇷🇺 5%
Oct. 19-20, 2026



















