I've seen the singularity, and it is us. Follows are not endorsements.
Joined April 2013
- Tweets32.9K
- Following126
- Followers653
- Likes23.2K
Pinned Tweet
The true definition of a super intelligent AGI is uncontrollability. If we can control it, it's either not AGI or not super intelligent.
Work back from there to whatever you think AI policy and investment should be.
Gerrymandering, besides being a cynical practice, is a bit like just-in-time supply chains. Works great normally, but is a house of cards when things go south. Political resilience was optimized away.
Democrats now will have at least 250 House seat, CNN projects
Hitting 260 is within reach as well, something virtually no one predicted
cnn.com/2026/11/05/politics/…
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
“when Kushner used the phone, they could see his screen. Almost as soon as they got inside, the [Dutch] intelligence service began capturing every image of Kushner’s screen as he used it, filing their own cache of surveillance on their internal computer servers.” vanityfair.com/story/jared-k…
The Russians hacked Jared's phone. Then Dutch cyberspies reverse-engineered that hack, giving them unprecedented access to his world. Bananas story here in @VanityFair
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
A horrific Russian strike in the Kharkiv region. A “shahed” struck people directly – in a park near an ordinary café. Pure atrocity. Six people were killed, including children. A little girl was killed in a stroller – her name was Angelina, she was just over a year old, born in August 2025… Her mother’s name was Inna. She died in the hospital… Another girl who was killed was 11 years old. My condolences to their families and loved ones. Another 14 people were injured, including six more children.
I am grateful to everyone who supports Ukraine under these circumstances and helps us shoot down “shaheds,” shoot down missiles, and stop Russian assaults. These are horrific photos, but behind them are shattered lives and the truth about this war. Lives must be protected. Ukraine needs air defense. You can't think about making money with Russia as long as it continues its asinine war. We ask that sanctions on Russia stay in place as long as the killings continue. We ask America to be strong, and we ask it to apply the Lindsey Graham law. We ask Europe to continue its support. We ask that everything possible be done to bring peace and guarantee security. Ukraine wants peace. It is Russia that has insisted on continuing the killing all this time. The world has enough strength to stop the war. That strength must finally be used – against the murderers.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
Don’t ask Ukraine to stop defending itself.
Ask Russia to stop attacking Ukraine.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
I'm testing the Russian bots, because traffic from Yandex bots is currently close to zero (check Cloudflare Radar). That's because Ukraine has imposed a ban on them — by firepower.
So I'm going to say the following things, which will most likely generate organic, authentic, human traffic, but without the bot traffic. Let's see:
* russia is a criminal state;
* russia is a terrorist state;
* russia is ruled by a criminal regime;
* Putin and the entire russian leadership, from 2014 and 2022 onwards, should find themselves inside the courtroom of The Hague Tribunal;
* Ukraine is defending itself against all of russia's attacks, pressure from the Trump Administration, and shipments of sophisticated components from around the world, including Europe;
* The Ukrainian people are, first and foremost, the ones whom we in Romania — and the Republic of Moldova as well (or especially) — should thank for keeping the russian Army at bay;
* The European Union is the best thing that has happened to Romania since the Great Union of 1918;
* The United States of America under Donald Trump has become nothing more than an empty shell of the values and principles it championed for decades;
* Donald Trump is a convicted common criminal, now also suspected of pedophilia and other forms of sexual abuse against girls and women in connection with the Epstein files;
* Elon Musk is an individual who has absolutely nothing to do with ethics or morality, not even remotely.
Feel free to add other things that might attract the bots' attention, and let's see whether they're still operating or not.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
Dear Americans,
I am a soldier of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and I want to tell you something.
Freedom is not measured in dollars. Freedom is not measured by the price of diesel in your car’s tank.
Freedom is measured by a nation’s willingness to fight for its country, its people, and its right to exist.
We Ukrainians know the price of freedom. We pay it in blood. Every single day.
We will continue striking Russian military targets. We will continue fighting Russian invaders on land, at sea, and in the sky. In Ukraine and wherever Russia wages its war against us.
Because we are not fighting for money, oil, or comfort.
We are fighting for our homeland. For our future. For our FREEDOM.
And we will never surrender it.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
Russia has a massive diesel shortage and doesn't have any surplus for export.
This is a conniving "Russia is helping the US" publicity stunt wherein Russia sends a few hundred thousand tons of diesel to the US, if that. Zero effect.
US consumes 15 million tons per month.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
So then the net effect is, when the AI labs race to solve everything first, an existing intellectual community ceases to exist, because it's too risky to talk to each other about what we're working on. Why wouldn't people be upset about that?
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
When Illinois saved its nuclear plants it was characterized as a “bailout”.
Since passage, the “bailout” has returned $2.7 billion to ratepayers.
ipa.illinois.gov/carbon-miti…
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
'Kensington Interior,' (1912) depicts the hallway of 67 Ladbroke Grove, London, W.11, the house which belonged to Frank Emanuel's parents and where he lived from about 1890 until around 1920.
Been getting a barrage of pro Russia tweets these past three days, as X becomes more and more aggressive about switching to "For You" and force-feeding this garbage.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
Why so many Ukrainians speak russian? Let me explain.
But first, let me ask you a question: Why do Irish and Scotts speak English, Catalans and Basques speak Spanish, Bretons speak French, etc. You probably know the short answer. But let me put a longer one. Ukrainian language was banned by russia 134 times! Here are most notable events:
1720: A decree by Tsar Peter I banned the printing of books in Ukraine.
1753: A decree by Catherine II prohibited teaching in the Ukrainian language.
1768: A decree from the Synod of the russian Orthodox Church called for the confiscation of Ukrainian primers from the population.
1775: Closure of Ukrainian schools after russian troops destroyed the Zaporizhian Sich.
1830-1840s: russification of Ukraine intensified. Even the very name "Ukraine" was prohibited to be used.
1889: At an archaeological congress in Kyiv, it was permitted to read papers "in all languages except Ukrainian."
1895: A ban on Ukrainian children's literature.
1914: A ban on the Ukrainian press.
1938: Mandatory study of the russian language was introduced throughout Ukraine. At the same time, there was a mass closure of national schools, and the prestige of the Ukrainian language declined.
1926-1939: Physical deportations of Ukrainian activists accused of nationalism. Four family members on my mother’s side were deported.
1929: Newly printed dictionary of Ukrainian was prohibited.
1960s: Arrests and extermination of the young generation of Ukrainian intelligentsia.
130 years ago, Ukrainian-speaking area was not limited by Ukraine, but also some parts of russia and Belarus spoke it (see the red area, that's the result of russian Empire census in 1897, when people identified themselves by the language). So, when someone says that some region of Ukraine is “russian speaking”, read the above list again. It’s a miracle that Ukrainian language even survived, and many people sacrificed their lives for it.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
Not enough.
Judge Cooper needs to assign a Special Master and remove Trump and his board.
We need indendence in there to see what is going on and protect this national monument.
I share this view. Just look at how badly the difficulty of driving, which has just two linear outputs (speed and turning angle), was underestimated. Still, it's worth pondering what humans will do when fully capable androids do arrive.
I’m on a flight now and my left hand was full so I had to use one hand to open a creamer and did so without thinking about it. But then I stopped to realize how incredible of a motion this kind of in-hand manipulation really is. I had to carefully peel back the seal while keeping the creamer level and keeping it from moving while applying a significant force with the other fingers. I had also flipped up and grasped the very small loose corner of the seal using my thumb and pointer finger in coordination. This motion would have been impossible with three fingers and likely very challenging with just four fingers. I realize this may seem like a mundane and inconsequential moment in daily life but when you stop and think about it it’s incredible what we do all the time. For robots this will be extremely difficult. And this is something most people can do with no special practice or training.
Now imagine specialist humans like Antonio Stradivari building violins or the best brain surgeon in the world today doing the hardest surgeries. There’s a VERY LONG WAY for robots to go before they really match even average humans and how much further before they match the best humans. I’m of course an optimist and believe that robots will start doing useful, economically-viable tasks within the next couple of years. But at the same time I’m really not worried about robots stealing jobs from humans. For quite a while there will be so many things that trip up robots that are no problem for the typical person. I believe the displacement will be slower than most think and that robots will mainly act as helpers for the easiest and most monotonous tasks for a good while. The harder things will come for sure and that will be awesome when robots can do even more. But I think there will be time for humans to adjust.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
I’m on a flight now and my left hand was full so I had to use one hand to open a creamer and did so without thinking about it. But then I stopped to realize how incredible of a motion this kind of in-hand manipulation really is. I had to carefully peel back the seal while keeping the creamer level and keeping it from moving while applying a significant force with the other fingers. I had also flipped up and grasped the very small loose corner of the seal using my thumb and pointer finger in coordination. This motion would have been impossible with three fingers and likely very challenging with just four fingers. I realize this may seem like a mundane and inconsequential moment in daily life but when you stop and think about it it’s incredible what we do all the time. For robots this will be extremely difficult. And this is something most people can do with no special practice or training.
Now imagine specialist humans like Antonio Stradivari building violins or the best brain surgeon in the world today doing the hardest surgeries. There’s a VERY LONG WAY for robots to go before they really match even average humans and how much further before they match the best humans. I’m of course an optimist and believe that robots will start doing useful, economically-viable tasks within the next couple of years. But at the same time I’m really not worried about robots stealing jobs from humans. For quite a while there will be so many things that trip up robots that are no problem for the typical person. I believe the displacement will be slower than most think and that robots will mainly act as helpers for the easiest and most monotonous tasks for a good while. The harder things will come for sure and that will be awesome when robots can do even more. But I think there will be time for humans to adjust.
Daniel Cincunegui retweeted
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
