Dan Munro (@DanMunro) header
Dan Munro (@DanMunro) profile picture

Author of Casino Healthcare w/ bylines in Forbes, Newsweek, re/code, Techonomy and healthcare specific publications.

Phoenix, AZ
Joined June 2008
Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)Photo by Dan Munro (@DanMunro)
What if single-payer healthcare is the wrong debate? The amount of the check matters more than the number of entities writing it. Maybe we should debate pricing first. danmunro.substack.com/p/why-…
121
Dan Munro retweeted
Twitter. Twitter. Twitter. Twitter. Twitter. Twitter. Twitter-Twitter-Twitter-Twitter....
Stop calling it Twitter. It's X.
3,128
24,814
1,517
137,746
1,990,343
Dan Munro retweeted
"Tesla Cybertruck orders surpassed 1.9 million just days after Elon Musk detailed that "demand for the vehicle is so off the hook, you can’t even see the hook" (July 21, 2023) 2026: It ends here: 70,000 sold (Tesla sold ~30 times less than it claimed to have "orders" ;)
76
242
28
986
27,212
We're reporting only a fraction of measles cases in the US; some estimates put it as low as 20% in states like PA. This outbreak is much larger than what's reported and is spilling into highly vulnerable communities like babies and pregnant women. We will lose our Measles elimination status this month, and it will take years of responsible public health management to get it back. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
6
760
68
1,404
163,889
Dan Munro retweeted
Latest Russian internet joke: "Trump's 7th and greatest bankruptcy, the Republican Party!" The goal now must be to prevent America from becoming the 8th.
36
957
18
4,164
51,690
Dan Munro retweeted
In case you didn't know how it works: Calley Means, who served as senior advisor at the 'department of health' under #RFQJr, revealed that 'chief of staff; susie wiles, "bowed to unrelenting pressure from lobbyists" to undo policy on the amount 1/ rawstory.com/susie-wiles-267…
21
238
8
776
167,852
Dan Munro retweeted
Tesla's inflated valuation ran out of hype five years ago and it's been circling the drain ever since. Five years ago, you could have put $150k into $TSLA or an index fund, or stuffed it under your mattress. After inflation, that $150k is now worth: S&P 500: $193k Mattress: $124k Tesla: $104k Grandma's S&P 500 index fund is up almost 29% after inflation. Even grandpa's mattress beat @ElonMusk. In an AI-fueled bull market, $TSLA lost to Walmart, Costco, Philip Morris, Exxon, the New York Times, and literal garbage collectors. Musk cashed out ~$40 billion of Tesla stock. His shareholders were left holding the bag: a stock down 15% in five years, a shrinking and aging lineup, 2% global market share, "Full Self-Driving" that still needs a babysitter, and robots that can barely stand up. Tesla has been dead money for five years.
69
153
20
640
27,229
There is no "universal healthcare." There is universal COVERAGE and that distinction is critical in both defining universal coverage AND the price of it. Just adding new/different coverage tiers w/ new/different prices isn't magically universal coverage. hc4.us/sp
The debate is not between people who support vs. oppose universal health care. EVERYONE supports universal health care. The debate is between those who think taking away your right to make your health decisions will achieve that goal, and those of us who know it will not.
144
Dan Munro retweeted
Fight the narrative: It's not RETRIBUTION. It's about ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE RETURN OF THE RULE OF LAW
98
1,555
43
4,616
28,934
This 66% is getting used a lot, but it isn't full picture. YES - 66% = Gov responsible BUT: * 31% = split b/w gov & private programs * 35% = single/nat'l gov program Is ensuring health care coverage a government responsibility? What Americans think | Pew Research Center
Medicare for All is what a record-breaking 66% of Americans want, per Kaiser Family Foundation. It would save $1 trillion and 114,000 lives a year, per Yale School of Public Health. No more tinkering around the edges. Let’s get it done.
1
117
Dan Munro retweeted
LITERALLY FUCKING RIDICULOUS.
Schumer: What I do as the leader is I'm the orchestra leader. I am not the best bassoonist. I highlight that person. I am not the great virtuoso singer. I highlight that person.
200
537
39
3,397
40,671
... and the 5-year cumulative departure from the original Medicare Advantage contract (for any reason) is ~48-53%. Medicare Advantage is heavily advertised - and "works" if you don't need actual healthcare - but once you do, it's a race back to traditional Medicare.
Have you asked seniors? Because 55% of them have fled the part of Medicare you want to make mandatory.
1
127
More GOP fiction. Five-year cumulative departure from the original MA contract for any reason ~48–53%. Medicare Advantage is great - as long as your healthy - and the success is due largely to HEAVY advertising - which traditional Medicare doesn't do.
55% of seniors have fled the part of Medicare Sanders want to make mandatory
168
Interesting proposal, but look beyond the MCare expansion. Most important provision is all-payer rate setting - which mirrors what Maryland has done successfully for decades. Core issue is amount of the check - not how many entities are writing it. hc4.us/sp
63
By blaming "the war," which is congealing as a talking point on Fox as well, they hope to avoid discussion of the massive corruption and also of the elephant in tbe room- a president who is unhinged and focused on himself and on other mens' bodies more than the economy and delivering for Americans.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
37
532
12
1,522
17,462
Voters aren't waiting. Likely to see more of this populist campaign finance reform as fiscal influence is challenged more directly.
There's a lot to focus on right now, but "The richest man to ever live just spent $200 million to support the Republican Senate candidate in Texas, and his man lost by double-digits in a statewide wipeout" is a completely insane sentence. Put another way, the most expensive US Senate race before 2020 was $200 million. *One guy* spent that amount in Texas, and it doesn't seem to have made any difference. It might have hurt in a kind of Streisand effect way, in that the spending level was seen as obscene to people sympathetic to the argument that billionaires shouldn't "buy" elections. The implications here seem pretty interesting! Especially re the limits of billionaire political power and/or the diminishing returns of money in politics.
65
Dan Munro retweeted
My favorite point about health costs as a voting issue. It was one element of voters’ cost of living concerns, NOT a separate issue, and underscoring the point, health costs, gas, and food are all tied: 
5
4
13
1,067
Dan Munro retweeted
Zohran Mamdani on Iran: I have to say that I find it quite ironic to read a post from the vice president as if he's describing the actions of a different administration. He's the vice president of the United States of America. He is not just some commentator online. And there has to be a reckoning of the fact that this is a war that they started. It's a war that they can end. If they think it was a part of their political demise, then why don't they actually start to take some action to reflect that?
69
2,590
72
17,401
3,235,135
Dan Munro retweeted
Zohran Mamdani is on fire. 🔥 🇺🇸JD Vance at 6:00 PM: We lost due to the Iran war which causes household inflation for Americans 🇺🇸Zohran at 7:00 PM: "Bro you are VP of USA, not a random Twitter troll. You can't post like it's someone else's war. You started it, You can end it. Stop tweeting and crying, start acting." Brutally Cooked 👏
577
17,893
377
83,694
2,173,843
Dan Munro retweeted
Trump brought regime change to Texas faster than to Tehran
83
907
85
4,942
197,694
This thought process from Karoline Leavitt — the idea that Americans are too stupid to know how good they have it right now — is exactly why Republicans are getting their asses kicked tonight. Complete lack of awareness and reality.
731
1,485
140
16,782
913,182